Thanks this looks fine.  

Rossi have to declare watt material he
used. 

On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 09:41:33 -0600, Bob Higgins  wrote:  
Jones,
I think you have far insufficient data to jump to the conclusion that
this is no longer a Ni-H reaction. Earlier, the hotCat used stainless,
and it worked just fine. Before that, it was just added H2 gas. Just
because alumina is used now does not mean it is "beta alumina" or even
uncoated alumina and that all of the H2 leaked out. Here is an example
of an alpha alumina coating that can be added to prevent diffusion of
hydrogen: http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3560 [1] . I
believe the process to still be a Ni-H reaction. 

That having been
said, the 1g of active fuel powder + hydride would not be enough hydride
to provide much H2 pressure in the large alumina tube (of course, we
don't have a good idea what the internal volume looks like). Apparently
when the powder was added, the device was shaken vigorously to disperse
the small amount of powder inside the cylinder. 

Storms has noted
before that there appears to be an unusual radiation coming from some of
his tests that activated the window in his GM tube. It appears that
transmutation could be caused at a distance; probably with a 1/r^2 sort
of density of transmutation. Of course, there is sparse evidence for
this too. 

Bob Higgins 

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Jones Beene 
wrote:

Sorry - but this reactor is made of alumina - which is a proton
conductor. Beta alumina is among the best proton conducting ceramics but
you would never use any form of alumina if you wanted to retain a supply
of hydrogen after startup.    

All of the initial hydrogen is gone
within an hour due to hydrogen diffusion.    

This looks like a
lithium-nickel reactor.   

         

Links:
------
[1]
http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3560
[2]
mailto:jone...@pacbell.net

Reply via email to