<torulf.gr...@bredband.net> wrote: > > The fraud hypothesis is an obvious option. > If it is so obvious then please explain how it would be done. By Rossi, I mean. Obviously if Levi et al. wanted to commit fraud they could simply publish fake data. They could make up the whole thing without doing an experiment.
You should please explain how Rossi made Levi's instruments give the wrong answer. If you cannot do this then you have no business saying that the fraud "hypothesis" is an "obvious option." - Jed
