Hello, On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, David White wrote: >On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 12:14 +0200, Pauli wrote: [..] >> How about making opengl optional so we have some interface for drawing >> and 2 implementations - One with current SDL and one with GL. Then just >> initialize openGL if it is present. > >It would be painful to maintain the game working with both SDL and >OpenGL. Additionally, one of the primary benefits of moving to OpenGL >would be to allow different and new graphical effects that cannot be >efficiently implemented using SDL, but if we had to make the game work >with SDL anyhow, this would be infeasible, or at the least would require >double-implementing such features in both SDL and OpenGL.
How about http://www.libsdl.org/opengl/index.php http://www.libsdl.org/cgi/viewvc.cgi/branches/SDL-1.2/docs/html/guidevideoopengl.html?revision=2608 But I think Wesnoth (Graphics) is fast enough now. On my older box[1] wesnoth-1.2 runs just fine, 1.3.3 is slower but definitely playable. Where Wesnoth is/feels "slow" is when loading savegames, which is why I mostly play on my much faster new box ;) -dnh [1] with Athlon 500, 320 MB RAM, Matrox Mystique... PS: 1.3.3 compiles and runs fine with SDL 1.2.4, it just needs a -DSDL_Colour=SDL_Color -- The more stupid the rules, the more fun one can have by following them _exactly_ to the letter. -- Alexander Schreiber _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
