Mark de Wever wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:50:11PM +0100, Fabian Mueller wrote: > >> I thought that was settled. >> > > No it never was, please point me where it was according to you. > You didn't reply to my mail regarding the issue. > >> I do have time now and I will continue to work on the feature. >> Always do I value the voices of the other developers and keep their >> advices in mind. >> >> My commits are all guarded by the EXPERIMENTAL flag. >> Please don't force me to do the work in a branch, >> that is much hard syncing work for esr. >> > > You really seem to ignore me, discussing whether something is a good > idea in the first place doesn't mean you should keep committing stuff. > > I need to investigate the code. After that I go back to a planning phase. And redo the thing. That is my usual workflow. I commit to have backup and to stay in sync with the rest of trunk. >> I can't delay the time of the implementation since I don't have time all >> the year. >> It's not my fault that every single day of my spring break is in feature >> freeze. >> > > That is a silly argument, just because the rules we have here don't suit > you, you can violate them? > > Which rule do I have violated? >>> So please stop committing stuff and lets get back to discussing stuff. >>> >>> >>> >> You want to go back to the very first question? >> If the editor is the right place for the features? >> >> >> People have had good arguments here, please answer to there points. >> > > Well what's the point of discussing if you keep going on without > discussing things? > >
I feel like discussing all the day. Must have missed something. _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
