Given we are more of a beta based project maybe we should shift to a WE 0.1, WE 0.2 & a WE 0.3 convention. This would be in greater alignment with software practices; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning#Version_1.0_as_a_milestone I believe we have yet to achieve a 1.0 release of WE
Peter On Oct 1, 12:19 pm, Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Minhaaj -- > > Nope WikiEducator 3.0 doesn't have anything to do with Web 3.0 -- thanks > goodness :-). I think that "Web 2.0" and Web 3.0" are over-hyped > marketing concepts. > > See my earlier email about the phases -- 3.0 refers to the 3rd phase of > WE's strategic plan. > > Cheers > Wayne > > > > On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 11:15 -0700, Minhaaj ur Rehman wrote: > > Thanks for your input steve and Peter. I don't know whether moving WE > > to Poly Otago was a good decision and why was that necessary, but like > > all other decisions council doesn't have a say in this, so lets hope > > for the best and work for the community like we have always been. As > > far as wikieducator 3.0 is concerned, does that have to do something > > with web 3.0 ? because i really missed 1.0 and 2.0 if they were out > > there anyways. > > > On Oct 1, 11:12 pm, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A very important observation Steve! > > > > "If I understand correctly, that's something that will be permanently > > > attached to Otago, so it won't serve as the separate legal entity > > > that > > > WE needs." > > > > On Oct 1, 9:53 am, Steve Foerster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Wayne wrote: > > > > > << This is an open invitation to all WIkiEducators for any questions > > > > you may have about WikiEducator 3.0, but more importantly providing > > > > us with well-founded advice on our next steps. >> > > > > > I have a few questions: > > > > > * Where did we get "WikiEducator 3.0"? I wasn't aware we'd had a > > > > 2.0. If anything, I'd call everything up to the point of elected > > > > community governance a beta version, and only now really going into > > > > production. Or, that we were in alpha before, now we're in beta, and > > > > once we have a separate legal entity we'll be in production. (Not > > > > that I'd suggest actually using any of that, I only meant those as > > > > comparative analogies.) > > > > > * I'd like to know exactly what your proposed timeline is for > > > > transferring WE from COL to Otago, what needs to be done, etc. How > > > > much do you have to do, and how much can others help you? > > > > > * I'd like to know more about the International Centre for Open > > > > Education that is being established at Otago Polytechnic. If I > > > > understand correctly, that's something that will be permanently > > > > attached to Otago, so it won't serve as the separate legal entity that > > > > WE needs. What will this Centre's relationship with WE be, and what > > > > else might it do? > > > > > * I understand that to this point you were acting in WE's interest and > > > > had to act quickly, and especially given that Otago seems to be more > > > > flexible than COL when it comes to software development and > > > > multilanguage support, I'm pleased we're moving there. However, I > > > > believe that from this point forward issues must be discussed openly > > > > and decisions must be made through Council resolutions. Do you see > > > > anything in our future that would make this impractical? > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > -=Steve=-- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
