I'm quite aware of what James was trying to achieve (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Doc_James/Foundation) and I'm fully in support of his ideas so if whatever he did was related to one of those he mentions on the link, then its quite understandable why right now I'm on his side and not on the the other side...5 of whom the community did not appoint (or trusts) and one who is there by 'default'
The issue is not what James did, it was the drastic step taken and above all the silence in relation to this from the 'BoT' which has become quite deafening..When you fire someone and them make a statement regarding it and why, we all would have accepted it and possibly fought it if we had found it unjustified..but when you fire someone and then run back into the hole...what are we to assume?..Its too early to start an investigation since no one is forthcoming...so speculation and allegations are the only things left... I'm not angry, I personally don't care but I have seen too much nonsense by the hierarchy over the last 5 years to allow another one to be swept under the rug under the veil of "privacy" ... -- Cometstyles _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
