On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Chris Keating <chriskeatingw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does the Affiliations Committee have a list of existing chapters which do > > not meet the proposed criteria? I think we should at least get a sense > for > > that, and those chapters should be notified and be put on the path to > > meeting standards or losing their status. > > > > Hi Ben, > > The closest is this table for eligibility for the Wikimedia Conference: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_ > 2016/Eligibility_Criteria > > That did not apply the same criteria as AffCom are using, but you can see > that there were 2 chapters which appeared to be entirely inactive, and a > further 3 that had some kind of activity but were not reporting activity in > the terms required by their chapter agreements or grants. > > In general, I think that it is sensible to have a method of inactive > chapters to be de-recognised - just as it is also useful for User Groups > working towards chapter status to know what they are meant to be working > towards. > As of this year, a process does exist, and is reflected here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_movement_affiliates/Protocol_for_noncompliant_Wikimedia_movement_affiliates (perhaps a link to this should be added to the AffCom nav-box.) This process is being followed, right now, to review the status of inactive and non-compliant chapters, at long last. A. -- Asaf Bartov Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org> Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! https://donate.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
