> Does the Affiliations Committee have a list of existing chapters which do > not meet the proposed criteria? I think we should at least get a sense for > that, and those chapters should be notified and be put on the path to > meeting standards or losing their status. >
Hi Ben, The closest is this table for eligibility for the Wikimedia Conference: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2016/Eligibility_Criteria That did not apply the same criteria as AffCom are using, but you can see that there were 2 chapters which appeared to be entirely inactive, and a further 3 that had some kind of activity but were not reporting activity in the terms required by their chapter agreements or grants. In general, I think that it is sensible to have a method of inactive chapters to be de-recognised - just as it is also useful for User Groups working towards chapter status to know what they are meant to be working towards. Regards, Chris Keating User:The Land _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
