... And, more importantly, its form doesn't say "separate the trail from
the link". Just like <nowiki>, it only *happened* to do it (I tried on
Wikipedia, and it doesn't do it now).

The point I'm trying to make in this thread is that <nowiki> happens to do
certain things other than showing wiki syntax without parsing, and is used
for them as if it's *intended* for it, but this is a hack. If a certain
functionality is needed, such as separating the trail from the link, then
it's worth considering creating a piece of syntax for it.

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬


‫בתאריך יום א׳, 7 באוק׳ 2018 ב-19:08 מאת ‪bawolff‬‏ <‪bawolff...@gmail.com
‬‏>:‬

> Alas, no longer valid in XML or HTML5. (Although HTML5 will still
> parse it as an empty comment, but with a  "incorrectly-opened-comment"
> error.
>
> --
> Brian
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 6:57 AM Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Found it :)
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/SGML/sgml-lex/sgml-lex
> >
> > Search for "empty comment declaration" :)
> >
> > -Chad
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018, 11:50 PM Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm personally a fan of <!>.
> > >
> > > I came across it years ago--it's a null comment. Can't find the
> reference
> > > at the moment though.
> > >
> > > -Chad
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 2:25 PM Daniel Kinzler <dkinz...@wikimedia.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Am 04.10.2018 um 18:58 schrieb Thiemo Kreuz:
> > >> > The syntax "[[Schnee]]<nowiki />reichtum" is quite common in the
> > >> > German community. There are not many other ways to achieve the same:
> > >> > <span /> or &shy; can be used instead.[1] The later is often the
> > >> > better alternative, but an auto-replacement is not possible. For
> > >> > example, "[[Bund]]<nowiki />estag" must become "[[Bund]]es&shy;tag".
> > >>
> > >> We could introduce new syntax for this, such as &nope; or even
> &nowiki;.
> > >>
> > >> Or how about {{}} for "this is a syntactic element, but it does
> nothing"?
> > >> But if
> > >> that is mixed in with template expansion, it won't work if it expands
> to
> > >> nothing, since template expansion happens before link parsing, right?
> For
> > >> better
> > >> or worse...
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Daniel Kinzler
> > >> Principal Software Engineer, MediaWiki Platform
> > >> Wikimedia Foundation
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Wikitech-l mailing list
> > >> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> > >
> > >
> > On Oct 5, 2018 11:50 PM, "Chad" <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm personally a fan of <!>.
> >
> > I came across it years ago--it's a null comment. Can't find the reference
> > at the moment though.
> >
> > -Chad
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 2:25 PM Daniel Kinzler <dkinz...@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Am 04.10.2018 um 18:58 schrieb Thiemo Kreuz:
> > > > The syntax "[[Schnee]]<nowiki />reichtum" is quite common in the
> > > > German community. There are not many other ways to achieve the same:
> > > > <span /> or &shy; can be used instead.[1] The later is often the
> > > > better alternative, but an auto-replacement is not possible. For
> > > > example, "[[Bund]]<nowiki />estag" must become "[[Bund]]es&shy;tag".
> > >
> > > We could introduce new syntax for this, such as &nope; or even
> &nowiki;.
> > >
> > > Or how about {{}} for "this is a syntactic element, but it does
> nothing"?
> > > But if
> > > that is mixed in with template expansion, it won't work if it expands
> to
> > > nothing, since template expansion happens before link parsing, right?
> For
> > > better
> > > or worse...
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Kinzler
> > > Principal Software Engineer, MediaWiki Platform
> > > Wikimedia Foundation
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to