On Jun 12, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Larry Yunker wrote: >> > But JAVA requires that a Java VM be installed on the PC. The point > is to > avoid having to install a separate "Framework". Ideally, I'd like a > linker > that would just compile in those components within .NET that I rely > upon. > The Java VM has a far greater market penetration than .NET. Back in my software days Java was over 95%.
-Matt -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
