When it comes to cross platform support, I would agree that Java wins out. When it comes to end-user software in a Windows environment, I would have to disagree and state that almost all recent (last 2 to 3 years) development has turned to the .Net platform.
Regardless, I am still seeking a 3rd option... I'm looking for a good development platform which can generate standalone exe's for Windows. - Larry -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:39 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] User check program On Jun 12, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Larry Yunker wrote: >> > But JAVA requires that a Java VM be installed on the PC. The point > is to > avoid having to install a separate "Framework". Ideally, I'd like a > linker > that would just compile in those components within .NET that I rely > upon. > The Java VM has a far greater market penetration than .NET. Back in my software days Java was over 95%. -Matt ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
