Question is.... Why does teh 600 series outperform them all, when it has the
slowest processor in MHZ?

Are Mikrotik's 532a speeds test at 266 or 400Mhz? And the 600 series at 200
or 400? They did specify on their report.

Is the 600's Power PC's processor really that much better that it gets so
much better speed at slower Mhz?

While I can not speak of it in use between these two routers, there is a reason why it was logical to move to RISC. They are more efficient chips and tend to be even more so when they are used in specific environments. If anyone is a Mac head from way back, you might remember the raw numbers between the 40MHz 68030 and the 25MHz PowerPC when Apple first moved to them.

<<inline: ctilogo200.jpg>>


Bo Ring
Account Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell: 630-743-1162 • office: 312-205-2515
16W235 83rd Street, Suite A, Burr Ridge, IL 60527 • tel: 773.667.4585 fax: 773.326.4641



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to