You guys are hilarious. In seriousness though, it shouldn't be a difficult if the argument is turned into what the value of the bands is to the economy, vs other uses.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Scott Carullo <sc...@brevardwireless.com>wrote: > Sure, why else would there be African bands... Of course its for the > African customers. Silly question. > > Scott Carullo > Technical Operations > 855-FLSPEED x102 > > > > ------------------------------ > *From*: "Robert" <nos...@avantwireless.com> > *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 7:24 PM > *To*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> > *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. > > > So does that mean I can use the African bands for my S. African > customers and etc...? > > On 11/14/2013 04:12 PM, Scott Carullo wrote: > > You can always go to the Japanese channels, they always seem to be nice > > and quiet ;) We have lots of Asian customers so we are allowed to use > > them in some areas... > > > > Scott Carullo > > Technical Operations > > 855-FLSPEED x102 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From*: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com> > > *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:59 PM > > *To*: sc...@brevardwireless.com, "WISPA General List" < > wireless@wispa.org> > > *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. > > > > Yeah... this is why I always preach 20dB above the noise floor... > > signals in the 45 to 55 range. If you install in the 70s you have no > > where to go. > > > > > > Matt Hoppes > > Director of Information Technology > > Indigo Wireless > > +1 (570) 723-7312 > > > > On 11/14/13, 6:52 PM, Scott Carullo wrote: > >> Hard to tell, noise floor is noise floor which keeps creeping up - we > >> all know things work better when its quiet. This used to worry me a lot > >> when I saw it coming, but then I realized it was already there and I had > >> no idea until I just happened to scan on some radios (I don't usually > >> install the stuff). I'm not worried any more, if its not one thing it > >> will be another any way. Thats what gives us the edge every day, > >> flexibility. We will work around it, we always do. > >> > >> I figure a high gain antenna on a tower with a good directional CPE will > >> continue to work fine. Their omni low gain antenna can't compete with a > >> 20-30db directional one. Still sucks though, you drive down the street > >> and see one after another running 5Ghz just knowing there probably isn't > >> 3 connections in the whole city to them.... > >> > >> Scott Carullo > >> Technical Operations > >> 855-FLSPEED x102 > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> *From*: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com> > >> *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:43 PM > >> *To*: "sc...@brevardwireless.com" <sc...@brevardwireless.com>, "WISPA > >> General List" <wireless@wispa.org> > >> *Cc*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> > >> *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. > >> > >> Are you seeing any impact from them? > >> > >> On Nov 14, 2013, at 18:03, "Scott Carullo" <sc...@brevardwireless.com > >> <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>> wrote: > >> > >>> Yeah, won't matter either way with a 5Ghz AP on every street corner. > >>> Already seeing that in our areas.... do a wireless scan and you see > >>> 354 5Ghz APs now in addition to the 2Ghz ones (they run dual band APs > >>> now). > >>> > >>> Scott Carullo > >>> Technical Operations > >>> 855-FLSPEED x102 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> *From*: "Bret Clark" <bcl...@spectraaccess.com > >>> <mailto:bcl...@spectraaccess.com>> > >>> *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:49 PM > >>> *To*: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org> > >>> *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. > >>> > >>> What could go wrong with Comcast taking up yet more 5GHz of > >>> spectrum...[/sarcasm off] > >>> > >>> On 11/14/2013 01:40 PM, ralph wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I hope the links at the bottom come through. > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>> Comcast needs the FCC to open up the 5 GHz spectrum band to power > >>>> next-generation Wi-Fi services that could allow it to deliver > >>>> wireless broadband at speeds of up to 1 Gbps, SVP of Business > >>>> Development Tom Nagel testified at a House Energy and Commerce > >>>> hearing on Wednesday. > >>>> > >>>> Nagel disclosed in his prepared testimony that Comcast has expanded > >>>> the number of Wi-Fi access points for Xfinity high-speed Internet > >>>> customers to 350,000. The nation's largest cable MSO also began > >>>> deploying wireless gateways from Cisco earlier this year that Comcast > >>>> has said may be able to power millions of neighborhood hotspots. > >>>> > >>>> While Comcast already is already using the 5 GHz band, Nagel said it > >>>> needs more of the unlicensed spectrum to meet demand from subscribers > >>>> for Wi-Fi. It faces potential opposition from Toyota and other > >>>> automobile manufacturers who want to use the 5 GHz band to deliver > >>>> next-generation connected car applications, including applications > >>>> that would warn drivers of collision threats. > >>>> > >>>> Toyota principal researcher John Kenney raised concerns about > >>>> possible interference from Wi-Fi services at Wednesday's hearing. > >>>> "We have been actively engaged with the Wi-Fi community and other > >>>> stakeholders who are exploring possible sharing solutions that will > >>>> alleviate any risk of harmful interference from unlicensed devices. > >>>> But we're not there yet and it's going to take a bit more time to see > >>>> if we can get there," Kenney said in his prepared testimony. > >>>> > >>>> For more: > >>>> - see Nagel's prepared testimony > >>>> < > http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=207&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0> > (.pdf) > >>>> - see Kenney's prepared testimony > >>>> < > http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=187&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0> > (.pdf) > >>>> - see Comcast blog post > >>>> < > http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=118&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0 > > > >>>> - /Broadcasting & Cable/ has this story > >>>> < > http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=190&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0 > > > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Wireless mailing list > >>> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> > >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireless mailing list > > Wireless@wispa.org > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
