?

On Nov 27, 2013, at 14:51, "Marlon Schafer (509.982.2181)" 
<o...@odessaoffice.com> wrote:

> The other good thing is that they will (hopefully) keep using wifi where we 
> can use polling mechanisms easier today so we *should* be more protected 
> against the interference than we used to be with older 2.4 gig gear.
> marlon
>  
>  
> From: Scott Carullo
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 3:52 PM
> To: Matt Hoppes ; sc...@brevardwireless.com ; WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>  
> Hard to tell, noise floor is noise floor which keeps creeping up - we all 
> know things work better when its quiet.  This used to worry me a lot when I 
> saw it coming, but then I realized it was already there and I had no idea 
> until I just happened to scan on some radios (I don't usually install the 
> stuff).  I'm not worried any more, if its not one thing it will be another 
> any way.  Thats  what gives us the edge every day, flexibility.  We will work 
> around it, we always do.
> 
> I figure a high gain antenna on a tower with a good directional CPE will 
> continue to work fine.  Their omni low gain antenna can't compete with a 
> 20-30db directional one.  Still sucks though, you drive down the street and 
> see one after another running 5Ghz just knowing there probably isn't 3 
> connections in the whole city to them....
> 
> Scott Carullo
> Technical Operations
> 855-FLSPEED x102
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:43 PM
> To: "sc...@brevardwireless.com" <sc...@brevardwireless.com>, "WISPA General 
> List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Cc: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
> 
> Are you seeing any impact from them?
> 
> On Nov 14, 2013, at 18:03, "Scott Carullo" <sc...@brevardwireless.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, won't matter either way with a 5Ghz AP on every street corner.  
>> Already seeing that in our areas....  do a wireless scan and you see 354 
>> 5Ghz APs now in addition to the 2Ghz ones (they run dual band APs now).
>> 
>> Scott Carullo
>> Technical Operations
>> 855-FLSPEED x102
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: "Bret Clark" <bcl...@spectraaccess.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:49 PM
>> To: wireless@wispa.org
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>> 
>> What could go wrong with Comcast taking up yet more 5GHz of 
>> spectrum...[/sarcasm off]
>> 
>> On 11/14/2013 01:40 PM, ralph wrote:
>>> I hope the links at the bottom come through.
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Comcast needs the FCC to open up the 5 GHz spectrum band to power 
>>> next-generation Wi-Fi services that could allow it to deliver wireless 
>>> broadband at speeds of up to 1 Gbps, SVP of Business Development Tom Nagel 
>>> testified at a House Energy and Commerce hearing on Wednesday.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Nagel disclosed in his prepared testimony that Comcast has expanded the 
>>> number of Wi-Fi access points for Xfinity high-speed Internet customers to 
>>> 350,000. The nation's largest cable MSO also began deploying wireless 
>>> gateways from Cisco earlier this year that Comcast has said may be able to 
>>> power millions of neighborhood hotspots.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> While Comcast already is already using the 5 GHz band, Nagel said it needs 
>>> more of the unlicensed spectrum to meet demand from subscribers for Wi-Fi. 
>>> It faces potential opposition from Toyota and other automobile 
>>> manufacturers who want to use the 5 GHz band to deliver next-generation 
>>> connected car applications, including applications that would warn drivers 
>>> of collision threats.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Toyota principal researcher John Kenney raised concerns about possible 
>>> interference from Wi-Fi services at Wednesday's hearing.  "We have been 
>>> actively engaged with the Wi-Fi community and other stakeholders who are 
>>> exploring possible sharing solutions that will alleviate any risk of 
>>> harmful interference from unlicensed devices. But we're not there yet and 
>>> it's going to take a bit more time to see if we can get there," Kenney said 
>>> in his prepared testimony.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> For more:
>>> - see Nagel's prepared testimony (.pdf)
>>> - see Kenney's prepared testimony (.pdf)
>>> - see Comcast blog post
>>> - Broadcasting & Cable has this story
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to