String some DC power along with the fiber? Maybe you put in coax for power 
since that apparently can be done? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Chuck Hogg" <ch...@shelbybb.com> 
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> 
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 8:38:49 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. 


How would you power it on fiber? 


Regards, 
Chuck 


On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 





Anyideas on the cost? It would be a great addition to any aerial fiber built 
out 

Gino A. Villarini 
g...@aeronetpr.com 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
787.273.4143 
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Zach Mann 
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 10:30 AM 
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. 




It's not just Comcast, TW, Cox are also taking advantage of the simplicity of 
the newer 7781-CM Access Point. They are offering free wifi to existing clients 
for retention. Down the road cellular offloading.... 802.11u 



On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Matt Hoppes < mhop...@indigowireless.com > 
wrote: 
That's one way to avoid pole attachment fees! LOL. 

What is Comcast trying to accomplish with these? 


Matt Hoppes 
Director of Information Technology 
Indigo Wireless 
+1 (570) 723-7312 


On 11/15/13, 9:26 AM, Zach Mann wrote: 
> He's talking about these... (see attached) 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Scott Carullo 

> < sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto: sc...@brevardwireless.com >> wrote: 
> 
> I'm not talking about the ones in peoples homes, I'm talking about 
> the ones the cable carrier hangs on the lines outside runing through 
> the city on every corner.... clear LOS to every tower around. 
> 
> Scott Carullo 
> Technical Operations 
> 855-FLSPEED x102 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> *From*: "Brian Webster" < bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com 
> <mailto: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com >> 
> *Sent*: Friday, November 15, 2013 8:24 AM 
> *To*: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org 
> <mailto: wireless@wispa.org >> 
> *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. 

> 
> One good thing about the higher bands and the noise floor is that 
> free space loss works to your advantage. That being that a 5 GHz 
> indoor Omni home AP router signal will fall off as an interference 
> source as a much shorter distance than a 2.4 GHz device will. The 
> laws of physics work in your favor. 
> 
> Thank You, 
> 
> Brian Webster 
> 
> www.wirelessmapping.com < http://www.wirelessmapping.com > 
> 
> www.Broadband-Mapping.com < http://www.Broadband-Mapping.com > 
> 
> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
> <mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org > 
> [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
> <mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org >] *On Behalf Of *Scott Carullo 
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:52 PM 
> *To:* Matt Hoppes; sc...@brevardwireless.com 
> <mailto: sc...@brevardwireless.com >; WISPA General List 
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. 

> 
> Hard to tell, noise floor is noise floor which keeps creeping up - 
> we all know things work better when its quiet. This used to worry 
> me a lot when I saw it coming, but then I realized it was already 
> there and I had no idea until I just happened to scan on some radios 
> (I don't usually install the stuff). I'm not worried any more, if 
> its not one thing it will be another any way. Thats what gives us 
> the edge every day, flexibility. We will work around it, we always do. 
> 
> I figure a high gain antenna on a tower with a good directional CPE 
> will continue to work fine. Their omni low gain antenna can't 
> compete with a 20-30db directional one. Still sucks though, you 
> drive down the street and see one after another running 5Ghz just 
> knowing there probably isn't 3 connections in the whole city to them.... 
> 
> Scott Carullo 
> Technical Operations 
> 855-FLSPEED x102 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> *From*: "Matt Hoppes" < mhop...@indigowireless.com 
> <mailto: mhop...@indigowireless.com >> 
> *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:43 PM 
> *To*: " sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto: sc...@brevardwireless.com >" 
> < sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto: sc...@brevardwireless.com >>, 
> "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org <mailto: wireless@wispa.org >> 
> *Cc*: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org 
> <mailto: wireless@wispa.org >> 
> *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. 

> 
> Are you seeing any impact from them? 
> 
> 
> On Nov 14, 2013, at 18:03, "Scott Carullo" 

> < sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto: sc...@brevardwireless.com >> wrote: 
> 
> Yeah, won't matter either way with a 5Ghz AP on every street 
> corner. Already seeing that in our areas.... do a wireless 
> scan and you see 354 5Ghz APs now in addition to the 2Ghz ones 
> (they run dual band APs now). 
> 
> Scott Carullo 
> Technical Operations 
> 855-FLSPEED x102 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> *From*: "Bret Clark" < bcl...@spectraaccess.com 
> <mailto: bcl...@spectraaccess.com >> 
> *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:49 PM 
> *To*: wireless@wispa.org <mailto: wireless@wispa.org > 
> *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. 


> 
> What could go wrong with Comcast taking up yet more 5GHz of 
> spectrum...[/sarcasm off] 
> 
> On 11/14/2013 01:40 PM, ralph wrote: 
> 
> I hope the links at the bottom come through. 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> Comcast needs the FCC to open up the 5 GHz spectrum band to 
> power next-generation Wi-Fi services that could allow it to 
> deliver wireless broadband at speeds of up to 1 Gbps, SVP of 
> Business Development Tom Nagel testified at a House Energy 
> and Commerce hearing on Wednesday. 
> 
> Nagel disclosed in his prepared testimony that Comcast has 
> expanded the number of Wi-Fi access points for Xfinity 
> high-speed Internet customers to 350,000. The nation's 
> largest cable MSO also began deploying wireless gateways 
> from Cisco earlier this year that Comcast has said may be 
> able to power millions of neighborhood hotspots. 
> 
> While Comcast already is already using the 5 GHz band, Nagel 
> said it needs more of the unlicensed spectrum to meet demand 
> from subscribers for Wi-Fi. It faces potential opposition 
> from Toyota and other automobile manufacturers who want to 
> use the 5 GHz band to deliver next-generation connected car 
> applications, including applications that would warn drivers 
> of collision threats. 
> 
> Toyota principal researcher John Kenney raised concerns 
> about possible interference from Wi-Fi services at 
> Wednesday's hearing. "We have been actively engaged with 
> the Wi-Fi community and other stakeholders who are exploring 
> possible sharing solutions that will alleviate any risk of 
> harmful interference from unlicensed devices. But we're not 
> there yet and it's going to take a bit more time to see if 
> we can get there," Kenney said in his prepared testimony. 
> 
> For more: 
> - see Nagel's prepared testimony 
> < 
> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=207&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0
>  > (.pdf) 

> - see Kenney's prepared testimony 
> < 
> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=187&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0
>  > (.pdf) 

> - see Comcast blog post 
> < 
> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=118&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0
>  > 
> - /Broadcasting & Cable/ has this story 
> < 
> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=190&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0
>  > 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto: Wireless@wispa.org > 

> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto: Wireless@wispa.org > 


> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 





_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to