Very small solar cells? :)

Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312

On 11/15/13, 9:38 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
> How would you power it on fiber?
>
> Regards,
> Chuck
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com
> <mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>> wrote:
>
>     Anyideas on the cost? It would be a great addition to any aerial
>     fiber built out____
>
>     __ __
>
>     Gino A. Villarini____
>
>     g...@aeronetpr.com <mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>____
>
>     Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.____
>
>     787.273.4143 <tel:787.273.4143>____
>
>     *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
>     [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Zach Mann
>     *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2013 10:30 AM
>     *To:* WISPA General List
>     *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.____
>
>     __ __
>
>     It's not just Comcast, TW, Cox are also taking advantage of the
>     simplicity of the newer 7781-CM Access Point.   They are offering
>     free wifi to existing clients for retention.  Down the road cellular
>     offloading.... 802.11u ____
>
>     __ __
>
>     On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Matt Hoppes
>     <mhop...@indigowireless.com <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>>
>     wrote:____
>
>     That's one way to avoid pole attachment fees! LOL.
>
>     What is Comcast trying to accomplish with these?
>
>
>     Matt Hoppes
>     Director of Information Technology
>     Indigo Wireless
>     +1 (570) 723-7312 <tel:%2B1%20%28570%29%20723-7312>____
>
>
>     On 11/15/13, 9:26 AM, Zach Mann wrote:
>      > He's talking about these... (see attached)
>      >
>      >
>      > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Scott Carullo____
>
>      > <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>
>     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com
>     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>> wrote:
>      >
>      >     I'm not talking about the ones in peoples homes, I'm talking
>     about
>      >     the ones the cable carrier hangs on the lines outside runing
>     through
>      >     the city on every corner....  clear LOS to every tower around.
>      >
>      >     Scott Carullo
>      >     Technical Operations
>      >     855-FLSPEED x102
>      >
>      >
>      >____
>
>      >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>      >     *From*: "Brian Webster" <bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
>     <mailto:bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com>
>      >     <mailto:bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
>     <mailto:bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com>>>
>      >     *Sent*: Friday, November 15, 2013 8:24 AM
>      >     *To*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org
>     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
>      >     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>>
>      >     *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz
>     spectrum.____
>
>      >
>      >     One good thing about the higher bands and the noise floor is that
>      >     free space loss works to your advantage. That being that a 5 GHz
>      >     indoor Omni home AP router signal will fall off as an
>     interference
>      >     source as a much shorter distance than a 2.4 GHz device will. The
>      >     laws of physics work in your favor.
>      >
>      >     Thank You,
>      >
>      >     Brian Webster
>      >____
>
>      > www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com>
>     <http://www.wirelessmapping.com>
>      >
>      > www.Broadband-Mapping.com <http://www.Broadband-Mapping.com>
>     <http://www.Broadband-Mapping.com>
>      >
>      >     *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
>      >     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>>
>      >     [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
>      >     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>>] *On Behalf Of *Scott Carullo
>      >     *Sent:* Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:52 PM
>      >     *To:* Matt Hoppes; sc...@brevardwireless.com
>     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>
>      >     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com
>     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>; WISPA General List
>      >     *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz
>     spectrum.____
>
>      >
>      >     Hard to tell, noise floor is noise floor which keeps creeping
>     up -
>      >     we all know things work better when its quiet.  This used to
>     worry
>      >     me a lot when I saw it coming, but then I realized it was already
>      >     there and I had no idea until I just happened to scan on some
>     radios
>      >     (I don't usually install the stuff).  I'm not worried any
>     more, if
>      >     its not one thing it will be another any way.  Thats what
>     gives us
>      >     the edge every day, flexibility.  We will work around it, we
>     always do.
>      >
>      >     I figure a high gain antenna on a tower with a good
>     directional CPE
>      >     will continue to work fine.  Their omni low gain antenna can't
>      >     compete with a 20-30db directional one.  Still sucks though, you
>      >     drive down the street and see one after another running 5Ghz just
>      >     knowing there probably isn't 3 connections in the whole city
>     to them....
>      >
>      >     Scott Carullo
>      >     Technical Operations
>      >     855-FLSPEED x102
>      >____
>
>      >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>      >
>      >     *From*: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com
>     <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>
>      >     <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com
>     <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>>>
>      >     *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:43 PM
>      >     *To*: "sc...@brevardwireless.com
>     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com> <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com
>     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>"
>      >     <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>
>     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>>,
>      >     "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org
>     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org> <mailto:wireless@wispa.org
>     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>>
>      >     *Cc*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org
>     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
>      >     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>>
>      >     *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz
>     spectrum.____
>
>      >
>      >     Are you seeing any impact from them?
>      >
>      >
>      >     On Nov 14, 2013, at 18:03, "Scott Carullo"____
>
>      >     <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>
>     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com
>     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>> wrote:
>      >
>      >         Yeah, won't matter either way with a 5Ghz AP on every street
>      >         corner.  Already seeing that in our areas....  do a wireless
>      >         scan and you see 354 5Ghz APs now in addition to the 2Ghz
>     ones
>      >         (they run dual band APs now).
>      >
>      >         Scott Carullo
>      >         Technical Operations
>      >         855-FLSPEED x102
>      >____
>
>      >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>      >
>      >         *From*: "Bret Clark" <bcl...@spectraaccess.com
>     <mailto:bcl...@spectraaccess.com>
>      >         <mailto:bcl...@spectraaccess.com
>     <mailto:bcl...@spectraaccess.com>>>
>      >         *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:49 PM
>      >         *To*: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
>     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
>      >         *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz
>     spectrum.____
>
>      >
>      >         What could go wrong with Comcast taking up yet more 5GHz of
>      >         spectrum...[/sarcasm off]
>      >
>      >         On 11/14/2013 01:40 PM, ralph wrote:
>      >
>      >             I hope the links at the bottom come through.
>      >
>      >
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
>      >
>      >             Comcast needs the FCC to open up the 5 GHz spectrum
>     band to
>      >             power next-generation Wi-Fi services that could allow
>     it to
>      >             deliver wireless broadband at speeds of up to 1 Gbps,
>     SVP of
>      >             Business Development Tom Nagel testified at a House
>     Energy
>      >             and Commerce hearing on Wednesday.
>      >
>      >             Nagel disclosed in his prepared testimony that
>     Comcast has
>      >             expanded the number of Wi-Fi access points for Xfinity
>      >             high-speed Internet customers to 350,000. The nation's
>      >             largest cable MSO also began deploying wireless gateways
>      >             from Cisco earlier this year that Comcast has said may be
>      >             able to power millions of neighborhood hotspots.
>      >
>      >             While Comcast already is already using the 5 GHz
>     band, Nagel
>      >             said it needs more of the unlicensed spectrum to meet
>     demand
>      >             from subscribers for Wi-Fi. It faces potential opposition
>      >             from Toyota and other automobile manufacturers who
>     want to
>      >             use the 5 GHz band to deliver next-generation
>     connected car
>      >             applications, including applications that would warn
>     drivers
>      >             of collision threats.
>      >
>      >             Toyota principal researcher John Kenney raised concerns
>      >             about possible interference from Wi-Fi services at
>      >             Wednesday's hearing.  "We have been actively engaged with
>      >             the Wi-Fi community and other stakeholders who are
>     exploring
>      >             possible sharing solutions that will alleviate any
>     risk of
>      >             harmful interference from unlicensed devices. But
>     we're not
>      >             there yet and it's going to take a bit more time to
>     see if
>      >             we can get there," Kenney said in his prepared testimony.
>      >
>      >             For more:
>      >             - see Nagel's prepared testimony____
>
>      >
>     
> <http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=207&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0>
>     (.pdf)____
>
>      >             - see Kenney's prepared testimony____
>
>      >
>     
> <http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=187&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0>
>     (.pdf)____
>
>      >             - see Comcast blog post____
>
>      >
>     
> <http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=118&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0>
>      >             - /Broadcasting & Cable/ has this story
>      >
>     
> <http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=190&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0>
>      >
>      >         _______________________________________________
>      >         Wireless mailing list
>      > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>     <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>>____
>
>      > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >     _______________________________________________
>      >     Wireless mailing list____
>
>      > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>     <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>>____
>
>      > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > Wireless mailing list
>      > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>      > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>      >
>     _______________________________________________
>     Wireless mailing list
>     Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless____
>
>     __ __
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Wireless mailing list
>     Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to