I'll just address one you raised Jens.
Google does not currently parse external Javascript files. So unless
Fairfax uses simple inline Javascript, and exposes spiderable URLS,
that's probably good enough for most of us to use progressive
enhancement methodology . Ask Lucas. When he gets back from SG
Chris
http://www.cogentis.com.au
Is there any other strong arguments for making pages available,
without javascript enabled?
I'd like to know too. On the Sydney Morning Herald in June less than
0.5% of users had JS disabled. Maybe we should drop that support?
Anyone willing to share their numbers/reasons?
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************
