> smf brought up another idea in private: you'd add clauses to the license > that no "new" (as in less than 3 years old) games could be added.
Only because you were claiming that what happened was completely within your rights as explained in the license. > This would do absolutely nothing, as people would realize that no mamedev has >enough money to persue litigation, and they'd simply release new drivers >anyway. MAME is not the EFF, The Free Software Foundation, or OSI. Which is pretty much what I said: "Would it change your opinion if the license said you weren't allowed to distribute source code that added support for new games? It can be changed." I was expecting you to say no. smf _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
