yam  

Messages by Thread

• [yam] #22: RFC 4409 Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL yam issue tracker
  • Re: [yam] #22: RFC 4409 Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL yam issue tracker
• [yam] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-05 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-05 Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [yam] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-05 Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [yam] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-05 Tony Hansen
• [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-05.txt Internet-Drafts
• [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL Chris Newman
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL John R. Levine
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL Tony Finch
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL Tony Hansen
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL John R. Levine
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL Chris Newman
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL John R. Levine
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL Tony Hansen
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL John C Klensin
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL SM
  • Re: [yam] Interop problem: SMTP submission, STARTTLS, AUTH EXTERNAL John C Klensin
• [yam] AD review of draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-04 S Moonesamy
• [yam] #21: AD review: STARTTLS yam issue tracker
  • Re: [yam] #21: AD review: STARTTLS yam issue tracker
• [yam] #20: AD review: SMTP AUTH yam issue tracker
  • Re: [yam] #20: AD review: SMTP AUTH yam issue tracker
• [yam] #19: AD review: Informational reference RFC 3851 yam issue tracker
  • Re: [yam] #19: AD review: Informational reference RFC 3851 yam issue tracker
• [yam] #18: AD review: editorial changes to pre-evaluation I-D yam issue tracker
  • Re: [yam] #18: AD review: editorial changes to pre-evaluation I-D yam issue tracker
• [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-04.txt Internet-Drafts
• [yam] Resent-From and Mailing Lists Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: [yam] Resent-From and Mailing Lists Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] Resent-From and Mailing Lists Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] Resent-From and Mailing Lists Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• [yam] pre-approved names for upcoming documents Tony Hansen
• [yam] IETF 77 YAM WG session S Moonesamy
• [yam] Draft Agenda for IETF77 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] Draft Agenda for IETF77 Tony Hansen
• [yam] Protocol Action: 'SMTP Service Extension for 8-bit MIME Transport' to Full Standard The IESG
  • Re: [yam] Protocol Action: 'SMTP Service Extension for 8-bit MIME Transport' to Full Standard Tony Hansen
• [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
• Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 John C Klensin
• Re: [yam] [Fwd: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03] John C Klensin
  • Re: [yam] [Fwd: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03] Ned Freed
• [yam] [Fwd: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03] Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Stephen Kent
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Dave CROCKER
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Stephen Kent
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Barry Leiba
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 John C Klensin
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Dave CROCKER
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Tony Finch
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 John C Klensin
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [yam] [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] [Fwd: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03] S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] [Fwd: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03] Dave CROCKER
  • Re: [yam] [Fwd: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03] Barry Leiba
  • Re: [yam] [Fwd: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03] John C Klensin
• Re: [yam] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
• [yam] final meeting time for YAM @ Anaheim Tony Hansen
• [yam] swapping YAM and MORG? Tony Hansen
  • Re: [yam] swapping YAM and MORG? SM
  • Re: [yam] swapping YAM and MORG? John C Klensin
• [yam] Last Call: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis (SMTP Service Extension for 8-bit MIME Transport) to Full Standard The IESG
• [yam] draft agenda up for Anaheim IETF 77 Tony Hansen
• [yam] Publication request for draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 S Moonesamy
• [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03.txt Internet-Drafts
• [yam] RFC5322 reference in RFC1652bis? Dave CROCKER
  • Re: [yam] RFC5322 reference in RFC1652bis? Tony Hansen
  • Re: [yam] RFC5322 reference in RFC1652bis? S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] RFC5322 reference in RFC1652bis? Dave CROCKER
• [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-02.txt Internet-Drafts
• [yam] [Fwd: RFC 3848 on ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration] Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [yam] Extension spec mandating multiple venues? S Moonesamy
• [yam] #17: Extension validity for both SMPT and Submit yam issue tracker
  • Re: [yam] #17: Extension validity for both SMTP and Submit (was: Extension validity for both SMPT and Submit) yam issue tracker
  • Re: [yam] #17: Extension validity for both SMTP and Submit yam issue tracker
• [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-03 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-03 Alfred Hönes
  • Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-03 S Moonesamy
• [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM meeting Tony Hansen
  • Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM meeting Barry Leiba
• [yam] slightly off topic: "token" production - MIME vs HTTP Julian Reschke
  • Re: [yam] slightly off topic: "token" production - MIME vs HTTP Ned Freed
• [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis S Moonesamy
• [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-03.txt Internet-Drafts
  • [yam] WGLC for draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-03 Tony Hansen
  • Re: [yam] WGLC for draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-03 S Moonesamy
• [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-02.txt Internet-Drafts
  • Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-02.txt Tony Hansen
  • Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-02.txt Barry Leiba
  • [yam] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-02.txt Internet-Drafts
• [yam] #16: RFC1652bis ABNF yam issue tracker
  • Re: [yam] #16: RFC1652bis ABNF yam issue tracker
• [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-01.txt Internet-Drafts
  • [yam] WGLC for draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis Tony Hansen
  • Re: [yam] WGLC for draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [yam] WGLC for draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis Tony Hansen
  • Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-01.txt Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-01.txt SM
  • [yam] Extension spec mandating multiple venues? Dave CROCKER
  • Re: [yam] Extension spec mandating multiple venues? Alexey Melnikov
• [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-00.txt Internet-Drafts
  • Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-00.txt Dave CROCKER
  • [yam] References in draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-00 (was: I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-00.txt) SM
• [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: [yam] [Imap-protocol] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] [Imap-protocol] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Lyndon Nerenberg
  • Re: [yam] [Imap-protocol] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Julien ÉLIE
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] [Imap-protocol] Re: draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Timo Sirainen
  • Re: [yam] [Imap-protocol] Re: draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] [Imap-protocol] Re: draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Tony Finch
  • Re: [yam] [Imap-protocol] Re: draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] [Imap-protocol] Re: draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Tony Finch
  • Re: [yam] [Imap-protocol] Re: draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Tony Finch
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Tony Finch
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Tony Finch
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Alfred Hönes
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Ned Freed
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Lars Eggert
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Magnus Westerlund
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Lars Eggert
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Joe Touch
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Joe Touch
  • Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS? Lars Eggert
• [yam] Next step for RFC 1652bis S Moonesamy
• [yam] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02.txt IESG Secretary
• [yam] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation S Moonesamy
  • Re: [yam] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [yam] Syntax of MIME documents (RFC 822 or 5322?) Julien ÉLIE

• Later messages