Hey Mark,
        I spent *so* many hours looking for that firmware.  Would you please
post the link?  Did the firmware dl you found come with fcode? Running blade
2000 here (SPARC).

Thx
Jake

On Jan 26, 2010 11:52 AM, "Mark Nipper" <ni...@bitgnome.net> wrote:

> It may depend on the firmware you're running. We've
> got a SAS1068E based
> card in Dell R710 at...
Well, I may have misspoke.  I just spent a good portion of yesterday
upgrading to the latest firmware myself (downloaded from SuperMicro's FTP,
version 1.26.00 also; after I figured out I had to pass the -o option to
mptutil to force the flash since it was complaining about a mismatched card
or some such) and I thought that the machine had locked up again later in
the day yesterday because I couldn't ssh into the machine.

To my surprise though, I was able to log into the machine just fine this
morning directly on the console from the command line.  It seems the snv_125
bug with /dev/ptmx bit me (the "error: /dev/ptmx: Permission denied" problem
that required me tracking down the release notes for snv_125 to figure out
the problem) and the server was happy otherwise.  More importantly, the
zpool activity had all finished and I have three clean spares again!
 Normally this amount of I/O would have totally killed the machine!

So somewhere between upgrading the firmware to the latest version and
upgrading to snv_131, it looks like the problem may have actually been
addressed.  I'm guardedly optimistic at this point, given the previous
problems I've had so far with this on-board controller.

Interesting to hear someone else with the same chip but on an expansion card
has no problems (but was with the on-board chip).

-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________

zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zf...
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to