John Levine wrote: >>> So I hear what you're saying, but it doesn't change my mind. I guess if the >>> large providers think this is useful, then meh, OK, >> >> That would be the guys who receive more than half of the world's email? I >> would rank that >> slightly above "meh", but sure, for small guys it's not yet obvious what >> value ARC >> provides. I'd suggest a wait-and-see approach. > > Yes, exactly. Pretty much the entire value of ARC is the strong hint > that the gorillas plan to implement it as a workaround to DMARC issues.
I am perhaps imaging things, but my recollection is that there is not merely a hint that ARC is being devised and implemented for this purpose, but that this was the openly stated rationale. - Roland _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
