On Tue 06/Jul/2021 02:55:23 +0200 Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss wrote:
On 22/5/21 7:41 am, Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss wrote:
At least at one point we definitely saw enough senders requiring too many
lookups that we cared more about
trying to find a positive evaluation than downside from doing more.
I'd suggest that a resolution to this might be to expand the finite limit (I've
also had trouble with the 10 lookup limit, even for a small organisation),
Why do organizations need more than 10 lookups? Do they have a choice of
several smart hosts? (And the latter need, to avail of reputed smart hosts,
keeps looking to me like a DMARC failure.)
An "SPF compiler" could gather a ton of addresses and dynamically assign them
to the.only.a.mechanism.U.need.example.com.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
