Re: [sage-devel] Re: polynomial coefficients -- sparse=True default -- why?

See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33813 for a somewhat related issue, by the way. On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 1:18:56 PM UTC-7 john.c...@gmail.com wrote: > My suggestion was only for univariate polynomials. I am certainly not > proposing this for multivariate polynomials. I still

[sage-devel] Re: Help wanted: Issue and PR templates, replacement for ticket dependencies

I think it's okay to not make things mandatory. For labels, I propose a simple approach first: "Blocker" or not, "Bug" or not. (Currently, the "Task" type isn't used much, so the major distinction is between "Defect" and "Enhancement". Changing to "Bug" or not captures this.) I like the

[sage-devel] Re: Help wanted: Issue and PR templates, replacement for ticket dependencies

I like the idea of mimicking the trac setup, but moving away from trac also lets us reconsider parts of the trac interface. I personally do not find the "Priority" label very helpful, other than whether it's a blocker or not. What do others think? We could just ask people to label "Blocker" if

Re: [Evolution] “No data source found for UID “5597c9d7bd6438ff80d075c5f38215f3a4a5a717””.

. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > 3.44.4-0ubuntu1 > > I know that subject file needs to be deleted, but where do I find it? https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2021-March/msg00035.html Cheers, andre Thank you.  I read the reference you cited before posting the error. Th

[Evolution] “No data source found for UID “5597c9d7bd6438ff80d075c5f38215f3a4a5a717””.

3.44.4-0ubuntu1 I know that subject file needs to be deleted, but where do I find it? Thank you, John ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

all vote" can be upgraded to a "big vote". In this case, all previously > handed-in votes are invalid and a discussion thread has to be opened. > > On Friday, 7 October 2022 at 17:43:02 UTC+2 John H Palmieri wrote: > >> I apologize for being indirect. I was responding

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

particular person who had advocated for a delay. We should be able to discuss general policy issues without this kind of derailing. On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 8:43:02 AM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > I apologize for being indirect. I was responding to Dima's sentence, "... > the delay wa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 3:45:27 AM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 12:19 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 7:05:38 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote: > >> > >> Dima, presumably you're not talk

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

he request as our policy dictates. On Thursday, October 6, 2022 at 12:42:17 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 Oct 2022, 20:21 Jonathan Thornburg, wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:45 AM John H Palmieri >> wrote: >> > There is nothing in our

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

wst...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 8:09 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > The main response I saw to the requests for a slower process was from > David Roe, saying, "Finally, since we're just voting on trac vs github I > don't think there's a need to

[sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

The main response I saw to the requests for a slower process was from David Roe, saying, "Finally, since we're just voting on trac vs github I don't think there's a need to draw out the discussion until October 1, and several people (William and Dima) have made arguments for making a decision

Re: [Evolution] Crashing Evolution 3.46.0 ?

-Original Message- From: Michael via evolution-list Reply-To: michaeljke...@outlook.com To: evolution-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Evolution] Crashing Evolution 3.46.0 ? Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 15:16:01 -0500 And literally after I hit send my Evolution crashed after being rock solid with

Re: [sage-devel] DISCUSS: move Sage development to Github

You would think that this would be a solved problem: others in the open source community must have be in the practice of backing up their GitHub info. On Thursday, September 29, 2022 at 6:55:44 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote: > A fair point made: an "exit strategy" from Github should exist and

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta0 released

I added #34594 and a new ticket, #34595 (findstat internet errors) to #25536. On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 2:16:48 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > I just posted a fix for the sage.misc.latex issue in > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34594. > > The octave issues are str

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta0 released

I just posted a fix for the sage.misc.latex issue in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34594. The octave issues are strange — maybe they depend on the version of Octave? You had posted at #33093 that you were getting this failure: File "src/sage/interfaces/octave.py", line 158, in

Re: [sage-devel] View issues

If you do `view(G, debug=True)`, it will first print out the entire LaTeX file that it's using. You could paste that into an actual file and see if you can pin down what the error is, and whether it's coming from your TeX installation or somewhere else. On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at

Re: [sage-devel] Temporary files problems

I created https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34593: we should document how to change the location of the temporary directory, and maybe we should create a `.tmpreaper` file. On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 11:06:01 AM UTC-7 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 18:10 +0100, Dima

Re: [sage-devel] Temporary files problems

On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 10:11:00 AM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > Basically, we should deprecate and remove tmp_dir() and tmp_filename() > from Sage. > Does Sagecell use them? It should not, Python3 has perfectly good > replacements... > As long as we test everything on a

Re: [sage-devel] Temporary files problems

On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 8:33:01 AM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Sep 2022, 15:45 John H Palmieri, wrote: > >> One of the issues is that code in Sage is using this temporary directory >> in the background; the user is not doing it

Re: [sage-devel] Temporary files problems

One of the issues is that code in Sage is using this temporary directory in the background; the user is not doing it and has no control over it. Regardless of the context manager approach, apparently some browsers refuse to open local files that are not in the user's home directory, so this

[sage-devel] Re: Temporary files problems

See also https://ask.sagemath.org/question/64192/temporary-html-files-location-in-sage-97/ — some browsers can't access local files in /tmp from the notebook, so plots do not appear. Perhaps TMP_DIR_FILENAME_BASE could be customizable. Other options? On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 7:58:01

Re: [sage-devel] DISCUSS: move Sage development to Github

e-trac-wiki-to-github > > now > > On Saturday, September 24, 2022 at 5:46:15 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > >> On Saturday, September 24, 2022 at 5:15:11 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: >> >>> I think I'm missing part of this. What is the actual path to

Re: [sage-devel] DISCUSS: move Sage development to Github

I think I'm missing part of this. What is the actual path to switching to GitHub? I've seen pages describing how individual development tasks will be converted from trac to GitHub, but what does the overall transition look like? - Do we just say, before November 1 (or whenever) we're doing

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 2:55:34 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2022, 22:44 John H Palmieri, wrote: > >> William, this is exactly why I search in the sage-trac Google group >> rather than on the trac website. > > > it's looks

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

William, this is exactly why I search in the sage-trac Google group rather than on the trac website. The sage-trac group is also good for browsing to see recent activity. On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 11:12:59 AM UTC-7 wst...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 10:27 AM Matthias

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

Another way that trac is searchable is via the Google group sage-trac. Can we set up a similar group if we move to Github? On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 10:14:26 AM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote: > On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 17:55:10 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > >> >> The conversion of the

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.rc2 released

Al tests pass for me on OS X Intel. On Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 4:04:43 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

A few comments: - We have a strong history in Sage of conducting votes, and I absolutely think we need to do that for this issue. We also have a history (with perhaps a small number of exceptions) of having majority rule, and I think that's what we should do here: no need for a 2/3 vote. An

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.rc1 released

I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34533 for this. On Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 6:44:55 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > Thank you for the confirmation. I now see it on two OS X machines, one > Intel, one Apple Silicon. > > > On Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 6:27:5

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.rc1 released

--- > (see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33212). > > Guillermo > > On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 00:03, John H Palmieri > wrote: > >> I just upgraded to OS X 12.6, with an accompanying change to Xcode. I am >> seeing this warning when docte

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.rc1 released

I just upgraded to OS X 12.6, with an accompanying change to Xcode. I am seeing this warning when doctesting: sage -t --random-seed=7664506257818559554244400680707390 src/sage/misc/sagedoc.py ** File

[sage-devel] Re: make error

Have you tried the suggestion printed at the end of `./configure`, namely % brew install ecl fplll freetype gsl gd mpfi nauty openblas python3 qhull r singular suite-sparse zeromq and then % source /Users/janvorloeper/sage/.homebrew-build-env and then run `./configure` again? The log file

Re: [sage-devel] Re: On changing Bernoulli(1) to +½

I have no opinions about what B_1 should be, but I am concerned about potential confusion: some users will expect one value for B_1, others will expect a different value, and so one group or other will end up being confused when answers don't come out the way they expect. The safest course

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

I have heard lots of support for moving to GitHub, and I do not really understand the arguments against. Is there more than "trac is what we're used to"? Can those who are opposed please articulate the reasons? I appreciate the efforts by Matthias and others to provide a roadmap for the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

On Friday, September 9, 2022 at 12:08:38 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:58 PM Thierry > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 04:07:48PM +0100, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > Several people promised to look for academic hosting for trac. Nothing

[sage-devel] Re: BROADCAST MESSAGE

Now I can. I wasn't seeing the "edit" pop-up before. I don't know if i was just not seeing it or if it actually wasn't there, but I see it now. Sorry for the noise. On Thursday, September 8, 2022 at 1:25:14 AM UTC-7 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > Le jeudi 8 septembre 2022 à 09:03:53 UTC+2,

[sage-devel] Re: BROADCAST MESSAGE

Let me echo everyone's thanks to the people who worked/are working on the upgrade. A question: I don't see a way to edit my comments on trac tickets. Is that feature gone? (If it is, I don't mind, I just want to make sure I'm not missing something obvious.) -- John On Wednesday, September

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.rc0 released

I just tried this, and I didn't see the same thing. After building `dot2tex`, it ran `./configure` and then rebuilt `sage-conf` and `sagelib`; the whole thing took about a minute. On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 at 10:52:11 PM UTC-7 tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote: > I just did a build from scratch

Re: [sage-support] Subalgebra membership in a polynomial algebra

Thanks, Dima, that's helpful. I will open a ticket; I hope this will be an easy thing for people familiar with the Singular interfaces. -- John On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 at 3:31:08 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 10:32 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > &g

[sage-support] Subalgebra membership in a polynomial algebra

Let R = k[x_1, x_2, ..., x_n] be a polynomial ring over a field k of characteristic p. Given elements a_1, a_2, ..., a_m and b in R, I would like to know if b is in the subalgebra generated by a_1, ..., a_m.My impression from a superficial skim of the literature (Shannon and Sweedler,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.rc0 released

At the start of sagemath_doc_html-none.log, I see .../sage-9.7.rc0/src/sage/functions/special.py:852: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence '\p' Fix is up at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34465. On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 6:15:10 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can

Re: [sage-support] Re: PATH in OS X Jupyter notebook

r necessary, as you did. >> >> I don't see any value in working hard to try to arrange that every >> possible thing can be done without ever using a terminal. There is nothing >> wrong with using a terminal. There are many tasks for which a terminal is >> the optima

Re: [sage-support] Compute equalizer of maps between polynomial rings?

e help to consider the kernel of f-Id (with Id the > identity map)? > Best, > Pedro > > El El jue, 25 ago 2022 a las 8:22, Dima Pasechnik > escribió: > >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, 00:38 John H Palmieri, wrote: >> >>> I have a polynomial r

Re: [sage-support] Compute equalizer of maps between polynomial rings?

Good question, and I don't whether the subring is finitely generated. I want to compute examples — what's the subring in a range of degrees — to see what's going on. On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 11:22:31 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, 00:38 John H

[sage-support] Compute equalizer of maps between polynomial rings?

I have a polynomial ring R = k[x1, x2, ..., xn] and a ring homomorphism f: R -> R. In case it matters, k=GF(2). I would like to find the subring of elements x satisfying f(x) = x: that is, I want to find the equalizer of the pair of maps (f, 1). Is there anything in Sage that will compute this?

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac #34152 needs you (to vote)!

hybrid > copy files > pseudo package On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 5:56:01 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > hybrid > > Hearty thanks for setting up the vote. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sage-devel] Purpose of some of the files in .sage

ue, 23 Aug 2022, 01:30 Dima Pasechnik, wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, 01:11 John H Palmieri, wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 4:02:05 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>

Re: [sage-devel] Purpose of some of the files in .sage

On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 4:02:05 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2022, 23:47 John H Palmieri, wrote: > >> What is the purpose of >> >> - $HOME/.sage/gap >> - $HOME/.sage/pexpect_logs >> - $HOME/.sage/cache >> >

[sage-devel] Purpose of some of the files in .sage

What is the purpose of - $HOME/.sage/gap - $HOME/.sage/pexpect_logs - $HOME/.sage/cache ? The first one currently takes 1.5GB on my machine, and it has a README.txt file that says "It is OK to delete all these cache files. They will be recreated as needed." So why do we keep them at all?

[sage-devel] Re: Failure to build 9.7.beta8

Maybe try some combination of `./bootstrap` and/or `make configure`, followed by `./configure && make build`? -- John On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 1:05:07 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote: > I get a failure when I do > git checkout tags/9.7.beta8 > make build > > I get > configure.ac:52: error:

Re: [sage-devel] Graph([(0,'a')]).vertices() raises exception

gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 5:46 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > "Fix your old code" could just mean using `vertices(sort=False)`. See > also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22349. > > > > fixing the sort() appears easy

[sage-devel] Re: Cython test suite

> https://github.com/cython/cython/runs/7788707146?check_suite_focus=true > > On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 10:04:08 AM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > >> What's the deal with the Cython test suite? I accidentally ran `make` >> with `SAGE_CHECK=yes` last night, and when

[sage-devel] Cython test suite

What's the deal with the Cython test suite? I accidentally ran `make` with `SAGE_CHECK=yes` last night, and when I checked this morning, the Cython test suite had been running for almost 12 hours. The log currently ends with runTest (__main__.EndToEndTest) [-1] End-to-end common_include_dir ...

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

>> >> On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 1:09:37 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: >> >>> Thank you for the link. With this ticket, the gurobi and cplex backends >>> still fail because I don't have gurobi and cplex installed. It would be >>> nice if that wa

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

: > This one is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34221 > > On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 11:55:36 AM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > >> Also, the various sage_numerical_backend_* packages fail to build, with >> errors like >> >&

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

^ check_add_col_untyped_args.pyx:1:0: 'sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pxd' not found Also downgrade? Is there a ticket for this? On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 11:07:51 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 9:49:21 PM UTC-7 Joh

[sage-devel] Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

The following packages do not build for me on OS X 12.5 (Monterrey), Intel chip: - polylib (#33758) - symengine_py (#34141) - p_group_cohomology (#30787) - r_jupyter - rubiks I propose that these be downgraded from optional to experimental until the issues are fixed. What do

[sage-devel] Doctesting question: feature detection

If I run "make ptestlong", then I see something like this: ### make ptestlong: Running ./sage -t --logfile=logs/test.log --long -p --optional=sage,optional --all Features to be detected: ... Using --optional=homebrew,pip,sage,sage_spkg and then after the tests Features detected for

Re: [sage-devel] Error building Sage 9.6 on Cygwin

r 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tries, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue remains persistent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very, very much fo

Re: [sage-devel] Error building Sage 9.6 on Cygwin

I don't think anyone has said this explicitly: after installing the packages recommended by ./configure, then you need to run ./configure again. Then run make. On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 9:25:07 AM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > and once you have the needed python3 packages installed, you

Re: List migration

So thank you Dennis!  I'm sure it probably cleared out some others caught in limbo as well. Many thanks to Jay as well for his service to the community. -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: [sage-devel] Graph([(0,'a')]).vertices() raises exception

"Fix your old code" could just mean using `vertices(sort=False)`. See also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22349. On Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 12:59:45 AM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, 08:17 Georgi Guninski, wrote: > >> hi sage developers :) >> long time no see.

[sage-devel] Re: Docstring Formatting Question: Bullet Points

I am "no" to having a Sage policy dictating blank lines, and I am also "no" to having a policy dictating no blank lines. As Kwankyu Lee points out, sometimes a blank line is useful, sometimes it isn't. We should leave it up to the judgment of each individual developer. On Tuesday, July 12,

Re: [sage-devel] Is trac down?

lliam Stein wrote: > > > > On it. > > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 2:45 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > > > I can't access trac.sagemath.org. Can someone please give it a kick? > > > > > > -- > > > John > > > >

[sage-devel] Is trac down?

I can't access trac.sagemath.org. Can someone please give it a kick? -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] Errors with dummy packages

While testing out a ticket, I accidentally asked Sage to build some of its fake packages, like pandoc or perl_cpan_polymake_prereq. (Well, I asked it to build packages for which these were dependencies.) These fail with messages like Error: pandoc is a dummy script package that the Sage

[sage-support] Re: Find the matrix representations corresponding to complex numbers and quaternions.

Is this the sort of thing you're looking for? def matrix_rep(z): """ INPUT: complex number z = a + bi OUTPUT: the matrix [a -b] [b a] """ a = z.real_part() b = z.imag_part() return matrix(RR, [[a, -b], [b, a]]) On Friday, July 1, 2022 at 3:04:40 AM

[sage-support] Re: "Inappropriate ioctl for device" when displaying number in Jupyter notebook

This might be fixed by the change at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33996. That will presumably be merged in the next beta release, since the ticket was just closed two days ago. On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 11:30:11 AM UTC-7 Richard Stanton wrote: > I've just installed Sagemath 9.6

Re: [Evolution] Something changed ...

I still have address completion on 3.44.1-0ubuntu1  [running under Ubuntu (Unity) 22.04]. John -Original Message- From: Anonymous Japhering via evolution-list Reply-To: Anonymous Japhering To: evolution-list@gnome.org Subject: [Evolution] Something changed ... Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022

[sage-support] Re: PATH in OS X Jupyter notebook

ould actually want to use > such a feature. Adding features that almost no one needs is not my idea of > a good design approach. > > What do the two of you think? > > - Marc > > On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:08:17 PM UTC-5 John H Palmieri wrote: > >> Hi Samuel, &

[sage-support] Re: PATH in OS X Jupyter notebook

Your pointer on how to include this into IPython config files works, as long as the lines are in quotes: c.InteractiveShellApp.exec_lines = [ 'import os; os.environ["PATH"] += ":/usr/local/bin" '] On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 10:09:39 AM UTC-7 slelievre wrote: &g

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta3 released

Try "make doc-clean doc-uninstall", not just "make doc-clean". On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:21:39 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:05 AM 'tsc...@ucdavis.edu' via sage-release > wrote: > > > > > >> Is anyone else seeing docbuilding issues? I am getting > >> > >>

[sage-support] PATH in OS X Jupyter notebook

How do I set the PATH in the OS X Jupyter notebook, if I'm using the 3-manifolds binary app? I mean, I know how to do it in an individual notebook, but how do I set the default PATH for every notebook? For example, how do I add /usr/local/bin so that it's in the PATH every time I open a new

[sage-devel] Re: XCode Update creates "C compiler cannot create executables"

Have you tried reinstalling the command-line tools? On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 6:44:54 AM UTC-7 gcha...@vols.utk.edu wrote: > Hello, > I recently updated my computer and XCode, which seems to have broken my > ability to compile sage. I have tried fully uninstalling and reinstalling, > making

[Evolution] Wrong send account being used by Evolution

3.44.1-0ubuntu1 When the long-term hospitalization of my administrative assistant began, I added her IMAP account to my Evolution email.  Her email address is hxxx...@lauterbachandassociates.com while mine is j...@lauterbachandassociates.com .  No matter what settings I make in Composer

[sage-devel] Re: manual memory management for GAP?

According to https://ask.sagemath.org/question/61829/how-to-deal-with-gaperror-error-reached-the-pre-set-memory-limit/, try "sage.interfaces.gap.gap_cmd = 'gap -r -o 4G '". On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 5:12:27 PM UTC-7 AlexGhitza wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to help out a friend who is

Re: [sage-devel] (configured)sage --advanced

On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 11:36:11 PM UTC-7 hohoa...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > > That is, "./sage --tox -p auto ..." is completely different from "./sage > -p auto". > > Would it be nice if the syntax for the options are consistent, like' > "sage --p PKG" instead of "sage -p PKG"? > It's

[sage-devel] Re: Vector power operator not implemented

In my opinion it's not very mathematical. If we implement powers for vectors like this (and products, too, as some of these other packages do), then for consistency, perhaps products and powers of matrices should behave the same way? Ordinary matrix multiplication is much more common in

Re: [sage-devel] Question about factories, representations and multiple classes

Isn't this because you're using CachedRepresentation? From the documentation : Instances of a class have a *cached representation behavior* when several instances constructed with the same arguments

Re: [sage-support] Re: Crystals won't view in jupiter notebook

ch displays; although it's not horribly happy :) (But latex is seldom > 'horribly happy' in my experience) > -- > > > On 6/4/22 12:37, John H Palmieri wrote: > > For any Sage object, the code for "view" first constructs a LaTeX version > and then runs pdflatex (o

Re: [sage-support] Re: Crystals won't view in jupiter notebook

though there is a Latex (digraph ?) error > Try > - > %%latex > > > B = crystals.Tableaux(['A',2], shape=[2,1]) > G = B.digraph() > > view(G) > print(B) > print(G) > -- > > Gives inpage; and nothing else > --B = crystals.Tableaux(['A',2], shape=[2,1]

Re: [sage-support] Re: Crystals won't view in jupiter notebook

Here is a workaround, or at least it works for me. The LaTeX code for the labels seems to be the issue. sage: B = crystals.Tableaux(['A',2], shape=[2,1]) sage: G = B.digraph() sage: G.set_latex_options(vertex_labels_math=False) sage: view(G) On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 4:06:26 PM UTC-7 John H

Re: [sage-support] Re: Crystals won't view in jupiter notebook

I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33947 to trac this problem. On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 3:30:49 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > For me, `show(G)` works, but not `view(G)`. `show(G)` does not use LaTeX, > and the problem is the LaTeX code produced by `view(G)`. You can al

Re: [sage-support] Re: Crystals won't view in jupiter notebook

> popped, you can save it where you want; manually. > > I am sure that > https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/graphs/sage/graphs/generic_graph.html > has the key to saving the .PDF programmatically where you want; but I am > going cross-eyed. > > rrogers > On 6/2/22 1

Re: [sage-support] Re: Crystals won't view in jupiter notebook

It's bad LaTeX, but I'm not sure what's producing it. If you run "view(crystals.Tableaux("A3",shape=[2,1]), debug=True)", then it will first print the LaTeX code, and if you paste that into a file, it will fail to compile. On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 6:42:51 AM UTC-7 HG wrote: > Some time

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta1 released

Could this be related to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33877? What version of `giac` are you using? On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 3:38:54 PM UTC-7 jus...@mac.com wrote: > > > > On May 27, 2022, at 12:32 , Volker Braun wrote: > > > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta1 released

All tests pass, but the git status is not clean after building: % git status On branch develop Your branch is up to date with 'trac/develop'. Untracked files: (use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed) src/doc/en/reference/documentation/sage_docbuild/ On Friday, May 27,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: The path MUST NOT contain spaces.

The development process and the trac server are documented at https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/trac.html#the-sage-trac-server. On Friday, May 27, 2022 at 12:30:38 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Friday, May 27, 2022 at 12:08:54 PM UTC-7 hohoa...@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> >

Re: [sage-devel] [ 1 = 1+0i ] <=> [ 1 = 1 ]

Are you asking whether a shell script can handle complex arithmetic? What does that have to do with Sage? If that's not what you're asking, please clarify. On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 5:38:43 AM UTC-7 hohoa...@gmail.com wrote: > P.S: Sorry, there was a typo here: > *# at configuration time.*

Re: [Evolution] Slow display of graphics intensive email

-To: Andre Klapper To: evolution-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Evolution] Slow display of graphics intensive email Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 07:15:22 +0200 On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 22:30 -0400, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > Thank you, Milan.  Is WebKitGTK WebDriver support supposed to be > ins

Re: [Evolution] Slow display of graphics intensive email

-Original Message- From: Milan Crha via evolution-list Reply-To: Milan Crha To: evolution-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Evolution] Slow display of graphics intensive email Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 07:34:55 +0200 On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 13:20 -0400, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > getting some ty

[Evolution] Slow display of graphics intensive email

RE: 3.44.0-1ubuntu1  Since upgrading OS and using 3.44.0-1ubuntu1 (instead of earlier versions)  ,getting some types of email containing extensive graphics (e.g., embedded images) to open sometimes take more than a few seconds, sometimes more than a minute.  When I reboot the PC's into Windows 10

Re: [Evolution] OAuth2 authorization bellsouth.net email accounts

is password sending: smtp.mail.yahoo.com, port 465, TLS on a dedicatet port, server requires authentication, and password type is plain John On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 11:38 -0400, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > Evolution version 3.44.0-1ubuntu1  > > OAuth2 authorization was not

[Evolution] OAuth2 authorization bellsouth.net email accounts

Evolution version 3.44.0-1ubuntu1  OAuth2 authorization was not a problem with earlier versions of Evolution as they did not require that authorization for bellsouth.net accounts.  Current version of Thunderbird running under Ubuntu 22.04 does not require it (nor does MS Outlook 365).  

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'sage'

You can run "git diff" and save the results in a file, and then post a link to the file. Then others could apply the patch and try it out. This also seems like a lot of work to eliminate some minor code duplication, in my opinion. On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 10:59:59 PM UTC-7

[gem5-users] help running parsec in SE mode

Hi All I am trying to run the PARSEC benchmark for MESI_two_Level(Ruby) in SE mode for a simple timing CPU for x86. Is there a script to run this? It will be great if someone can help. Thanks John ___ gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org To

[gem5-users] PARSEC benchmarks SE mode

Hi, I am trying to run the PARSEC benchmark for MESI 2 level in SE mode for a simple timing CPU. Is there a script to run this? ___ gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org

[sage-devel] Re: We need 1237 more functions to get to 99% coverage.

Why 99%? The code says for goal in [70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 99]: if score < goal: ... so whoever wrote it decided that 99% was a worthwhile goal to report, along with 70%, 75%, etc. What are the functions? The output lists all of the files and their scores, so you can

[sage-devel] Re: Did you run configure?

If they indeed haven't run `./configure`, then they should. I think it's not too much to ask someone to read the README file before trying to build Sage. If they have already run `./configure`, then the error message needs to be fixed. On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 7:19:45 PM UTC-7 Matthias

Re: Advice on Desoldering an IC

the solder was removed quickly and the parts literally dropped off the boards.  I have also used it to rework some badly soldered (by me) sockets on a QBone card I was assembling.  While it was relatively expensive (to me) it has been worth the cost. John H. Reinhardt On 4/15/2022 4:32 PM, Rob

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >