Re: [sage-devel] Re: Errors from MacOS build with Python3

2019-05-30 Thread John H Palmieri
docutils-0.14 > > I'll run make ptest-python3 as you suggest. > > Thanks again > > Brian > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:19 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 2:15:12 PM UTC-7, Brian Ball wrote: >>> >&g

[sage-devel] Re: Errors from MacOS build with Python3

2019-05-30 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 2:15:12 PM UTC-7, Brian Ball wrote: > > I built sage 8.7 with python 3.6. > What do you mean by "built"? Did you run "make"? If so, did it complete without error? (I would find that surprising, since "make" should build the documentation.) What does the file

[sage-devel] Are Sage library files supposed to pass when using "sage -tp --file-iterations=N FILES"?

2019-05-30 Thread John H Palmieri
If I run ./sage -tp --file-iterations=2 src/sage/algebras/ then I get many doctest failures. Is this expected? Is something broken when using the "--file-iterations" flag? -- sage -t src/sage/algebras/free_algebra.py # 1

Re: [sage-devel] error building pynormaliz with 8.8.beta6

2019-05-29 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 5:52:26 PM UTC-7, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 5/28/19 5:09 PM, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > > > $ cd > /home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pynormaliz-2.5/src > > $ strace sh congiure > > ... > > 4000 lines in total including: > > ... > >

[sage-support] Re: how to do ?

2019-05-25 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, May 25, 2019 at 3:31:00 AM UTC-7, HG wrote: > > sage -i database_odlyzko_zeta > > doesn't work in sagemath-8.8beta6 ? > > How can I do it ? > > Please provide more details: what platform? What went wrong. It worked for me, by the way: $ ./sage -i database_odlyzko_zeta ...

[sage-support] Re: installation on OSX Mojave, Sage V. 8.7

2019-05-24 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, May 24, 2019 at 9:03:39 AM UTC-7, frank wessel wrote: > > downloaded the sage-8.7-OSX_10.11.6-x86_64.dmg (hopefully the latest) > installed the package into Applications/SageMath folder > set the SAGE_ROOT env variable in /etc/profile > You should not need to set the SAGE_ROOT

Re: [sage-devel] Would anybody like...progress bars?

2019-05-23 Thread John H Palmieri
There is also the "warn-long" flag: sage -t --warn-long 3.2 FILE should tell you all tests in FILE that take more than 3.2 seconds. On Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 4:05:04 PM UTC-7, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > sage -t --verbose (or -tp of course) > > Best, > Travis > > > On Friday, May 24,

[sage-devel] Re: Printing a matrix of large size

2019-05-18 Thread John H Palmieri
Did you try "print(mat.str())"? On Saturday, May 18, 2019 at 6:37:02 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > Hi, > > If mat is a matrix of large size, it is displayed in a short form: > > sage: mat > 22 x 32 dense matrix over Finite Field of size 2 (use the '.str()' method > to see the entries) > > >

Re: [sage-support] Re: parent of permutation

2019-05-04 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 11:18:40 PM UTC-7, Daniel Krenn wrote: > > On 04.05.19 06:04, Andrew wrote: > > The `Permutation` function is more general. For example, the folllowing > > all work: [...] > > Thank you. But sorry, this does not answer my question. Maybe I should > be more precise:

[sage-devel] Re: CHomP

2019-05-03 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 10:22:25 AM UTC-7, Salvatore Stella wrote: > > Hi All, > has anyone tried installing CHomP recently? For me it fails applying > patches. > It is an old-style package and apparently it is very stale; does it > provide > any tangible speedup in

Re: Modern Rack Rails in Classic Racks?

2019-05-01 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
wouldn't be able to run anything a good number of months.  I do miss my Ohio basement.  Basements in the DFW area are few and far between due to the type of soil around here. -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: Modern Rack Rails in Classic Racks?

2019-05-01 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
ing and two BL860c I2 Itanium for OpenVMS  (2) APC 2U high 3000VA SUM3000RMXL2U UPS systems Rack: <https://www.ebay.com/itm/27U-4-Post-Open-Frame-Data-Server-Rack-19-32-Deep-3-Pairs-of-L-Rails/161408751608> -- John H. Reinhardt

[RBW] In praise of Silver Shifters

2019-04-26 Thread John H.
I have used indexed shifters my entire adult life. To be honest, I never really had any issues and I never really found any of my bikes particularly difficult to set up and adjust. That said, for some reason when I went to spec out shifters for my new Sam Hillborne, I decided to try out

Re: H960 rack on eBay

2019-04-26 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
58> BA11 Chassis: <https://www.ebay.com/itm/ONE-Vintage-DEC-PDP-11-BA11-LE-UNIBUS-Expansion-Unit-RARE/123730039634> -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: [sage-devel] patchbot questions

2019-04-24 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, April 23, 2019 at 12:18:13 AM UTC-7, Daniel Krenn wrote: > > On 23.04.19 01:37, John H Palmieri wrote: > > I was running a patchbot successfully until some time last week. For > > reasons I don't understand, I did "git pull" on the patchbot, and now it

[sage-devel] patchbot questions

2019-04-22 Thread John H Palmieri
I was running a patchbot successfully until some time last week. For reasons I don't understand, I did "git pull" on the patchbot, and now it won't run with Python 2, complaining File "sage_patchbot/plugins.py", line 309 yield from names ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Do I

[sage-support] Re: reconnect to remote sagemath jupyter notebook?

2019-04-22 Thread John H Palmieri
If you're willing to use the Sage command-line interface rather than the notebook, then you might try the "screen" program, which should already be installed on linux or Mac OS X. You might remotely log in to the machine running Sage and then do "screen sage". Then you type in whatever commands

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sorting a list of variables

2019-04-22 Thread John H Palmieri
On Monday, April 22, 2019 at 11:03:48 AM UTC-7, slelievre wrote: > > Having defined > > sage: x = SR.var('x', 20) > sage: a = [x[11], x[8], x[10], x[9]] > > sorting by repr or by str is disappointing: > > sage: sorted(a, key=repr) > [x10, x11, x8, x9] > > sage: sorted(a,

[sage-devel] Re: python3 status report (mi-april of last python2 year)

2019-04-19 Thread John H Palmieri
What does sage: C Set partitions of {'a', 'c', 'b'} reveal? Is it helpful, or can it be omitted? Maybe it's good enough to do sage: C = SetPartitions(["a", "b", "c"]) sage: C.cardinality() 5 sage: sorted(C) [{{'a'}, {'b'}, {'c'}}, {{'a'}, {'b', 'c'}}, {{'a', 'b'}, {'c'}}, {{'a', 'b', 'c'}},

[Evolution] Evolution 3.32.1-2 solves problems with prior version used with Ubuntu 18.10

2019-04-18 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
Ubuntu 19.04 was just released. It comes with Evolution 3.32.1-2. This new version of Evolution solves "string" errors with some mail servers as well as a send error with another. Well worth the upgrade to Ubuntu 19.04 John ___ evolution-list

[sage-devel] Re: Matrix exponentials of diagonal matrices.

2019-04-16 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 8:30:13 PM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 8:06:06 PM UTC-7, Brian Fitzpatrick wrote: >> >> >> Is this a bug? >> >> Looks like it. The problem seems to be that "sparse matrices over SR" > aren't special cased the way dense matrices are

[sage-devel] Re: frozensets in doctests / for display in Python3

2019-04-16 Thread John H Palmieri
Is the printed order important? If not, you can change the doctest to something else that is actually testing something relevant, maybe like sage: 'B' in frozenset() True or sage: (define the frozenset S somehow) sage: S == frozenset(['A', 'B', 'C']) True Or if

Re: [sage-devel] Polyhedron.vertices() function call behaviour

2019-04-11 Thread John H Palmieri
Can you provide details of how you created the polyhedron? As David said, Q.vertices() should make a copy before returning the result, and I would like to recreate this so I can fix it. On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 9:21:42 PM UTC-7, Narayanan Narayanan wrote: > > Thank you David. Using

Re: [sage-support] Preferred way to navigate through documentation

2019-04-07 Thread John H Palmieri
You should also look at the Sage tutorial (http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/tutorial/). The 2nd page of the "guided tour" talks about "?", and there may be other things that you would find useful. On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 5:36:18 PM UTC-7, Fan Zhang wrote: > > Thanks a lot! "?" is the

[sage-devel] Re: building documentation with python3.6 and topcom installed

2019-04-04 Thread John H Palmieri
What happens when you run this version of Sage and do sage: PointConfiguration.set_engine('internal') # to make doctests independent of TOPCOM sage: p = PointConfiguration([[-1,-1],[1,1],[1,0],[0,1],[0,0]]) and then if that succeeds, plot p? What if you omit the first line and just

[sage-devel] "@experimental" decorator, doctests, and py2 vs. py3

2019-04-04 Thread John H Palmieri
I am confused about how Sage's doctests work with a deprecation warning, for example as coming from the @experimental decorator. Here is a snippet from the top of rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py: sage: R = ZpLC(2) doctest:...: FutureWarning: This class/method/function is marked as

[sage-devel] Re: load() function doesn't pop up a PNG viewer

2019-04-03 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 4:20:43 PM UTC-7, Yagamy Light wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 4 April 2019 01:58:09 UTC+3, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 3:13:43 PM UTC-7, Yagamy Light wrote: >>> >>> >

[sage-devel] Re: load() function doesn't pop up a PNG viewer

2019-04-03 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 3:13:43 PM UTC-7, Yagamy Light wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, 3 April 2019 22:42:15 UTC+3, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 17:43:51 UTC+2, Yagamy Light a écrit : >>> >>> # Steps to reproduce (in terms of terminal comands: >>> >>> $ cat

Re: [sage-support] Print statement vs function in Sage-py3

2019-04-03 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 10:11:19 AM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 6:03:23 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:47 PM > >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, Sage community. >> > With the upcoming migration of Sage from Python2 to Python3,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.8.beta0 released

2019-03-31 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, March 30, 2019 at 3:42:10 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > PS: this should now build without manually installing additional headers > on OSX 10.14, so if you have a Mojave machine that previously gave troubles > compiling Sage please try this version and report back! > It works

[sage-support] Re: Sage options not recognized.

2019-03-29 Thread John H Palmieri
What does "sage --version" say? On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 12:47:44 PM UTC-7, Jose Garcia wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm trying to install a package to sage math, and I can't get sage to > recognize specific options. > > Ex > > $ sage --package fix-checksum conjecturing > sage-run received

[RBW] Brake Boss Prep? (new frame)

2019-03-29 Thread John H.
Hey Gang -- I'm building up my first Rivendell (a Canti-Sam) and I hope to mount of set of Tektro CR720 cantilever brakes this spring. This is a brand new frame and the bosses (at least to me) seem quite smooth and free of debris and paint. My question to the group: Is it recommended to take

[Evolution] The reported error was “Error fetching message info: expecting a string”. solution found

2019-03-27 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
The reported error was “Error fetching message info: expecting a string”. Subject error occurs with 3.30.1-1build1 (Ubuntu 18.10). The workaround, at least on my backup PC, is to install Evolution 3.32.0 (flatpak.git). Two e- mail provider that gave the string error with 3.30.1-1build1 do

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7 released

2019-03-27 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 2:54:48 PM UTC-7, Simon King wrote: > > Hi John, hi Samuel, > > On 2019-03-27, John H Palmieri > wrote: > >> Regarding the failures in src/sage/tests/modular_group_cohomology.py > >> related to the optional package p_group_cohom

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7 released

2019-03-27 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 5:02:23 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > Sun 2019-03-24 00:41 UTC, Volker Braun: > > > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.7. > > On Debian 9.8 ("stretch"), from a fresh git clone, building > python2-based SageMath with as many optional

[sage-devel] Re: How docstrings generate html

2019-03-24 Thread John H Palmieri
On Sunday, March 24, 2019 at 12:21:43 PM UTC-7, Chaman Agrawal wrote: > > I was trying to contribute through a ticket related to documentation but I > am not sure how docstrings are generating HTML and have doubts. > 1) It is ignoring all the function of with names like __function_name__ >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: how does the res/mod in "geng" work?

2019-03-21 Thread John H Palmieri
It's part of nauty. > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:58 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, March 21, 2019 at 9:38:03 PM UTC-7, Ai Bo wrote: >>> >>> Saw this in the document: >>> res/mod : only generate subset res out of subsets 0..mod-1

[sage-devel] Re: how does the res/mod in "geng" work?

2019-03-21 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, March 21, 2019 at 9:38:03 PM UTC-7, Ai Bo wrote: > > Saw this in the document: > res/mod : only generate subset res out of subsets 0..mod-1 > It would help if you gave some context for this. I'm guessing that most Sage users won't know what "geng" is. I certainly didn't. I found

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7.rc0 released

2019-03-20 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 9:17:37 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > so you need to rebuild sagelib with new libvpx. > In general after a major system update it's best to "make distclean" > and rebuild from scratch. > > Or you can touch pyx files which depend upon libvpx and run make,

Re: SCSI2SD: Is it worth a try?

2019-03-18 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
Compaq AlphaServer DS10 with a Qlogic ISP1020 SCSI card and OpenVMS V8.4 Others have had success with MicroVAXen and V7.3 and earlier so I think it's my system, but I haven't had time to work it out yet. -- John H. Reinhardt PRRT #8909 C HS #11530 N-Trak #7566

Re: [sage-support] yasm can not be installed/compiled

2019-03-18 Thread John H Palmieri
What are the modification dates and times for the files in the directory /apps/srv01/pmt/pmtfh/sage/sage-8.6/local/var/tmp/sage/build/yasm-1.3.0.p0 Maybe you should run 'make' again, which will regenerate this directory, and then check the times on the files. Are any of them in the future?

Re: [sage-devel] Re: internet tests failing

2019-03-15 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, March 15, 2019 at 3:31:33 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:51 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > I'm seeing the same failure on a Mac running the most recent OS X. I > have openssl 1.1.1a installed on this machine, and

[sage-devel] Re: pretty print latex doctest error

2019-03-14 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 1:46:38 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote: > > I just ran the following command, and amazingly got only one timeout and > one error. The rest is fine. > > ./sage -tp 3 -T 600 --optional=sage,python2,latex src/sage > >

[sage-devel] Re: internet tests failing

2019-03-14 Thread John H Palmieri
I'm seeing the same failure on a Mac running the most recent OS X. I have openssl 1.1.1a installed on this machine, and I see the error in Sage. Then I did './sage -i openssl' and './sage -f python2', and I still see the error. The Python 2 log file does not list ssl among the modules which

Re: VAX 4000-100 Free to a good home

2019-03-12 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
: they say Yee haw a lot down here). BTW, If this VAX can't find a home and is destined for a dumpster, I'll hold it as long as necessary.  I'm very close to Fort Worth, TX (Okay, I gave it away...) -- John H. Reinhardt

[sage-devel] Recommendation for Mac OS X users on Sage's cutting edge

2019-03-11 Thread John H Palmieri
For those of you who use OS X and also like to do incremental upgrades to Sage's most recent beta release, I would suggest running 'make distclean' and then 'make'. Why? Previous versions of Sage have broken file manifests for its packages – not broken on linux, only OS X – so package

Re: [Evolution] Evolution problem connecting

2019-03-11 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 11:27 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 05:41 -0400, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > Evolution is more sensitive to upsets on the major e-mail services than is > > Outlook 365, for example. Within the past day, Evolution

Re: [Evolution] Evolution problem connecting

2019-03-11 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 10:25 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 16:45 -0400, Roger Burgess wrote: > > Evolution returns error: "cannot send message: service not > > connected". > > > > I have tried everything. I can receive remote mail but not send any > > using

Re: [sage-devel] error while building sage

2019-03-05 Thread John H Palmieri
In case others have this problem before the next beta is released: not just sphinx is missing as a dependency, but also ppl. You should do ./sage -i sphinx ppl followed by make On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 2:56:00 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Thanks, you found a bug in Sage -

[sage-devel] Build docs (even more) in parallel?

2019-03-03 Thread John H Palmieri
Would it be possible to generate all of the plots in the reference manual in parallel? For example, the plots in local/share/doc/sage/inventory/en/reference/plotting/sage/graphs seem to be generated serially, and this is a bottleneck in building the reference manual. Maybe instead of

Re: [sage-devel] What to do with the sys.path security patch?

2019-02-28 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, February 28, 2019 at 9:16:19 AM UTC-8, E. Madison Bray wrote: > > > I suggest a middle ground: I don't believe this behavior should be > tested in Sage's test suite, because this is a question about the > Python interpreter's behavior, not Sage. The possibility of running > Sage

[sage-devel] Re: Inequalities in Z/nZ

2019-02-27 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 3:14:53 PM UTC-8, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 2:17:06 PM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> Why does Sage allow inequalities in Z/nZ? >> > > I'm pretty sure that it's a historical artifact from

[sage-devel] Inequalities in Z/nZ

2019-02-27 Thread John H Palmieri
Why does Sage allow inequalities in Z/nZ? sage: Z3 = Integers(3) sage: a = Z3(4) sage: b = Z3(2) sage: a < b True sage: a < 3 False While < may make sense in the set {0, 1, 2, ..., n-1}, it doesn't make sense in the ring Z/nZ: sage: Z3(1) < Z3(2) True sage: 1+Z3(1) < 1+Z3(2) False sage:

[sage-devel] Re: Error building Sage

2019-02-27 Thread John H Palmieri
Please try this: ./sage -f zlib ./sage -f python2 python3 make and see if that fixes the problem. (Apologies for not responding in French.) On Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 1:52:02 PM UTC-8, Quentin Hillebrand wrote: > > En compilant avec make j'obtiens j'obtiens une erreure lors de la >

[sage-support] Re: How to find coordinate vector

2019-02-22 Thread John H Palmieri
I would define the span over the integers differently, using "span_of_basis" to make sure it uses the basis you specify: sage: V = ZZ^2 sage: W = V.span_of_basis(R) sage: W Free module of degree 2 and rank 2 over Integer Ring User basis matrix: [1 3] [1 0] sage: W.coordinates([0,3]) [1, -1]

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.beta3 released

2019-02-21 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, February 9, 2019 at 7:08:36 PM UTC-8, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > > > > On Feb 8, 2019, at 11:27 , Volker Braun > wrote: > > > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >

[sage-support] Re: solution of a 4th degree equation is real despite containing I but causes trouble

2019-02-20 Thread John H Palmieri
Or range(abs(t))? Then if there is some numerical noise leading to a tiny imaginary part (your t might be evaluated to 2.573037896825689 - 4.365411232224172e-17*I for example), abs(t) won't care. On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 10:42:32 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > How about

[sage-support] Re: solution of a 4th degree equation is real despite containing I but causes trouble

2019-02-20 Thread John H Palmieri
How about range(0, RR(t))? On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 10:11:14 AM UTC-8, Michael Beeson wrote: > > Oh, and range(0,n(t)) also crashes. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sage-support] Re: solve() behavior

2019-02-19 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 8:56:50 AM UTC-8, Michael Beeson wrote: > > When I try to reproduce Eric's post, I get an error message about an > unexpected keyword argument > (maybe my version of Sage is too old.) But look at this: > > sage:

[sage-devel] Re: Unable to compile sage 8.7.beta3 on mojave...

2019-02-18 Thread John H Palmieri
On one of my machines running OS X Mojave, when I run 'make', the pip installation fails, saying ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'zlib' That's when the solution is ./sage -f zlib python2 python3 make On Monday, February 18, 2019 at 12:58:19 PM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote

[sage-devel] Re: Unable to compile sage 8.7.beta3 on mojave...

2019-02-18 Thread John H Palmieri
At this point you should probably do 'make distclean' and start again. There should be no need to do 'sage --sh' and easy_install, and that could easily mess things up. On Monday, February 18, 2019 at 12:29:20 PM UTC-8, Andrew wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 19 February 2019 03:44:02

[sage-devel] Re: Unable to compile sage 8.7.beta3 on mojave...

2019-02-18 Thread John H Palmieri
On Monday, 18 February 2019 17:46:24 UTC+11, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> Please try: >> >> ./sage -f zlib >> ./sage -f python2 >> ./sage -f python3 >> >> and if those work, try 'make' again. >> >> John >> >> >> >>

[sage-devel] Re: Unable to compile sage 8.7.beta3 on mojave...

2019-02-17 Thread John H Palmieri
Sorry, that's wrong. Try: ./sage -f zlip <-- This is the correction ./sage -f python2 ./sage -f python3 make See also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26899. John On Sunday, February 17, 2019 at 10:40:59 PM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > Please try: > > ./sage -f zip >

[sage-devel] Re: Unable to compile sage 8.7.beta3 on mojave...

2019-02-17 Thread John H Palmieri
Please try: ./sage -f zlib ./sage -f python2 ./sage -f python3 and if those work, try 'make' again. John On Sunday, February 17, 2019 at 6:11:51 PM UTC-8, Andrew wrote: > > I have been unable to compile sage for a while on both an imac and a > macbook pro that are running mojave (clearly

[sage-devel] Re: Unable to compile sage 8.7.beta3 on mojave...

2019-02-17 Thread John H Palmieri
Please try: ./sage -f zip ./sage -f python2 ./sage -f python3 and if those work, try 'make' again. John On Sunday, February 17, 2019 at 6:11:51 PM UTC-8, Andrew wrote: > > I have been unable to compile sage for a while on both an imac and a > macbook pro that are running mojave (clearly my

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.beta1 released

2019-02-05 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 4:53:02 PM UTC-8, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > > > > On Jan 26, 2019, at 16:18 , Volker Braun > wrote: > > > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >

Re: [sage-devel] sage install slow or hanging on bleach?

2019-02-04 Thread John H Palmieri
ch-3.0.2.tar.gz > > Is this what you wanted to see? > > (Also, would it not say 'invalid checksum' because I hit ctrl+c to abort > whatever download it was doing?) > > > On Monday, February 4, 2019 at 12:39:10 PM UTC-6, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> Actually, don't do th

Re: [sage-devel] sage install slow or hanging on bleach?

2019-02-04 Thread John H Palmieri
Actually, don't do that yet. What do you get with $ ls -l upstream/bleach-3.0.2.tar.gz It shouldn't say "Invalid checksum": that is a standard package and a valid tarball should be included with the Sage distribution. On Monday, February 4, 2019 at 10:36:57 AM UTC-8, John H Palm

Re: [sage-devel] sage install slow or hanging on bleach?

2019-02-04 Thread John H Palmieri
Try downloading bleach-3.0.2.tar.gz separately and put it in the "upstream" directory in Sage. Then run "./sage -i bleach". (If I try the link http://mirrors.mit.edu/sage/spkg/upstream/bleach/bleach-3.0.2.tar.gz

[sphinx-users] Re: hard to identify offending line in source file

2019-01-29 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 1:01:32 PM UTC-8, Phillip Feldman wrote: > > I'm new to Sphinx, so perhaps this is a stupid question. > > When I see an error message like the following from Sphinx, it is unclear > to me which line of the source file is triggering the error: > > docstring of

[sage-devel] Re: spkgs dependencies graph

2019-01-29 Thread John H Palmieri
Cool, and then you can call Poset(digraph_spkg()). On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 12:56:07 PM UTC-8, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > Quick tentative, not smooth: > > from sage.misc.package import * > > > > > def digraph_spkg(): > """ > digraph > """ > opts = {} > > > local =

Re: [Evolution] An impax account that works on MS Outlook for Office 365 but not evolution

2019-01-28 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 15:30 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 08:37 -0500, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > The log file says "[impapx:M] Removed connection 0x55a1212a54c0 > > (server:0x55a1212a54c0) due to error: Error fetching message

Re: [Evolution] An impax account that works on MS Outlook for Office 365 but not evolution

2019-01-28 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 10:55 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Sat, 2019-01-26 at 08:32 -0500, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > If one starts evolution with $ CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx:io > > evolution , there are numerous error messages as evolution tries to > >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7.beta1 released

2019-01-26 Thread John H Palmieri
And now the documentation builds with Python 3! (This is due to #26949 plus a lot of prep work organized by Frédéric.) On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 4:18:24 PM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the

[Evolution] An impax account that works on MS Outlook for Office 365 but not evolution

2019-01-26 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
RE: EVOLUTION 3.30.1-1build1 , OS=Ubuntu 18.10 Subject problem started back in November 2018, but it only became important when I wanted to use a particular account to forward an e-mail account I had received on another account. All my important e-mail accounts are impax, and I have my spare

Re: Orphan HP Alphaservers looking for a new home

2019-01-24 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
... -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: [sage-devel] How is package installation/uninstallation supposed to work?

2019-01-23 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 9:58:19 AM UTC-8, E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 6:26 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 9:11:17 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri > wrote: > >> > &g

Re: [Evolution] Signatures are not saved

2019-01-23 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 12:14 -0500, Paulo Cesar G. Costa wrote: > Hi, > > > I cannot make signatures to work. They do not get saved at all. > > > Edit > Preferences > Signature Tab > Add > > - Opens the Edit Signature window and let me create a signature > - I wrote "test" as "Signature Name"

Re: [sage-devel] How is package installation/uninstallation supposed to work?

2019-01-23 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 9:11:17 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 9:06:45 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 8:57:24 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: >>> &g

Re: [sage-devel] How is package installation/uninstallation supposed to work?

2019-01-23 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 9:06:45 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 8:57:24 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 3:59:41 AM UTC-8, E. Madison Bray wrote: >>&g

Re: [sage-devel] How is package installation/uninstallation supposed to work?

2019-01-23 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 8:57:24 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 3:59:41 AM UTC-8, E. Madison Bray wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:30 PM John H Palmieri >> wrote: >> > >> > Here is

Re: [sage-devel] How is package installation/uninstallation supposed to work?

2019-01-23 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 3:59:41 AM UTC-8, E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:30 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > Here is the situation: I've been playing around with new versions of > Sphinx. If I've installed a new version and then g

[sage-devel] How is package installation/uninstallation supposed to work?

2019-01-22 Thread John H Palmieri
Here is the situation: I've been playing around with new versions of Sphinx. If I've installed a new version and then go back to an old version, the directory local/lib/python2.7/site-libraries/sphinx/ is not removed and then recreated, but instead the changed files are reinstalled, leaving

[sage-devel] Re: Startup time improvement in 8.6

2019-01-17 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 12:11:03 PM UTC-8, Timo Kaufmann wrote: > > When packaging sage 8.6, I noticed that startup felt unusually fast. So I > averaged the startup time over 100 runs: > > ``` > for i in {1..100}; do > Are the file names interchanged here? > "sage-8.5/bin/sage"

Re: [Evolution] Mail sent from IMAPX account disappeared after message sent

2019-01-03 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 14:38 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 09:08 -0500, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > > > This is with Plain Text and Quote reply set. > > And yet it's still wrong. Your actual text in the reply posted to the > list

Re: [Evolution] Mail sent from IMAPX account disappeared after message sent

2019-01-03 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 13:01 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 20:35 -0500, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 23:15 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 13:03 -0500, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > > > On

Re: [Evolution] Mail sent from IMAPX account disappeared after message sent

2019-01-02 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 23:15 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 13:03 -0500, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 18:12 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 10:19 -0500, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > > &g

Re: [Evolution] Mail sent from IMAPX account disappeared after message sent

2019-01-02 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 18:12 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 10:19 -0500, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 15:06 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 09:31 -0500, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > > > RE: 3.

Re: [Evolution] Mail sent from IMAPX account disappeared after message sent

2019-01-02 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 15:06 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 09:31 -0500, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > > RE: 3.30.1-1build1 OS: Ubuntu 18.10 > > Within the past hour, I sent out an e-mail using one of the IMAPXaccounts on > > my PC. I went to find the

[Evolution] Mail sent from IMAPX account disappeared after message sent

2019-01-02 Thread Dr. John H. Lauterbach
RE: 3.30.1-1build1 OS: Ubuntu 18.10 Within the past hour, I sent out an e-mail using one of the IMAPX accounts on my PC. I went to find the sent mail in the Sent folder for the e-mail account I used and the sent message was not there. I then logged on the webmail for the account, and it was

[sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

2018-12-20 Thread John H Palmieri
UTC-8, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > Even considering the pivotal rôle of polynomials and fraction fields > thereof ? > > Le jeudi 20 décembre 2018 20:47:03 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit : >> >> Critical but it's not a blocker, in my opinion. >> >> >>

[sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

2018-12-20 Thread John H Palmieri
Critical but it's not a blocker, in my opinion. On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 11:36:15 AM UTC-8, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > This seems > seems to be a showstopper, enough to trump the best laid out plans of mice, > men

[sage-devel] Re: Changes in polynomial quotient ring are intended?

2018-12-20 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 9:49:38 AM UTC-8, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 11:11:25 AM UTC-8, Jörg-Volker wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> in version 8.4 this example doesn't work anymore as it did at least until >> version 8.2: >> varl = ['x0', 'x1', 'x2', 'x3'] >> B =

Re: Any VCF Forum Mods or Admin here?

2018-12-18 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
On 12/18/2018 11:24 PM, Evan Koblentz via cctalk wrote: I'll take care of it. On 12/19/18 12:10 AM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk wrote: Does anyone here have any pull or contacts with the owner or moderator at the Vintage Computer Federation forums?  I've been a member there since January 2014

Any VCF Forum Mods or Admin here?

2018-12-18 Thread John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
ouncement.php?f=23=2>. No response. So I am asking here because I figure there must be some overlap and maybe someone know someone that can help Thanks. -- John H. Reinhardt

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.5.rc1 released

2018-12-17 Thread John H Palmieri
With the workaround, when you set OBJC_DISABLE_INITIALIZE_FORK_SAFETY, it must be set to YES, not yes. Which way did you try it? John On Monday, December 17, 2018 at 1:56:38 PM UTC-8, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > > > > On Dec 16, 2018, at 14:35 , Volker Braun > wrote: > > > > As always,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.rc0 released

2018-12-14 Thread John H Palmieri
Fails to build from scratch on some OS X Mojave machines. I think the issue is that on the affected machine, there is no directory /usr/include. What happens is that due to a configure check (from #26286), zlib is not built, but then Python cannot find zlib and so builds without zlib support.

Re: [RBW] Cool bike shops in Boston?

2018-12-11 Thread John H.
* Harris over in West Newton (as noted above) is a must. There’s a great BBQ restaurant around the corner (Blue Ribbon BBQ) if you’re into that sort of thing. * Cambridge Bicycle is just over the bridge in Kendall Square. They have a ton of cool Swift, Nitto and Fairweather stuff. -- You

[sage-support] Obtaining the factors in a tensor product

2018-12-09 Thread John H Palmieri
1. Suppose I have a tensor product X = V tensor W of appropriate objects (instances of CombinatorialFreeModule, for example). How can I retrieve V and W from X? 2. Suppose I have a basic tensor x = v tenor w in V tensor W. How can retrieve v and w from x? For example, if A is your favorite

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta6 released

2018-12-03 Thread John H Palmieri
This problem is being tracked at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26522, but I have no idea how to fix it. (The problem with facade_sets is that certain parts of the documentation are completely omitted during a Python 3 build, one symptom of which is missing cross-references.) Please look at

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >