Sergio Ramazzina wrote:
Hi to everybody,
I would kindly know how my company can be listed between the companies that
has Struts Knowledge, as a consultancy firm in Italy tah gives consultancy
services and bases its application on this wolderful platform.
Thanks a lot for the information
Adam Hardy wrote:
Hermod,
it totally depends on what logging package you are using. Whichever
you have, you should make sure that the logger class for org.apache is
set to warn or error or similar.
In addition, Tomcat also has a nifty debugging tool that dumps out all
the request and response
-faces (IMHO) is bindings to tie the two frameworks together, plus
a few tags to make the transition easier for existing Struts based apps
-- and one could easily argue that even those should be separated from
the core integration library.
Craig McClanahan
James Holmes wrote:
Craig,
If you're listening, I'm curious why you created a base tag for
struts-faces? Is there any need for it? It is breaking the example
applications because it is rendering an invalid value.
Thanks for any info.
-James
(Getting back to Apache stuff after a long couple of
Ted Husted wrote:
I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to make sure it stays in synch with Tomcat 5.
It is indeed, but that's actually a mistake. It needs to compile
against the 2.3 version, since that's what JSF specifies as a minimum
platform. I'll fix that in
I'll be posting a list of the
actual dependencies I'm using for the Struts nightly build, which should
correspond to what we actually include in 1.2.1.
Craig
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:56:41 -0700, Craig McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Husted wrote:
I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces
Craig McClanahan wrote:
Note: my nightly build scripts use Ant, not Maven ... and I'm in the
process of cleaning that up.
I should clarify what I really meant to say :-).
I'm cleaning up my Ant-based build scripts to be more explicit about
which versions of dependent projects I use
This is probably old news to the other developers, but hey ... just
catching back up :-).
I've got the HEAD of jakarta-struts compiling fine now, but watned to
run the unit tests. For either Tomcat 4.1 or 5.0, the start.tomcat.xx
target seems to hang at the end of the startup, rather than
Craig
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:56:41 -0700, Craig McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Husted wrote:
I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to
make sure
it stays in synch with Tomcat 5.
It is indeed, but that's actually a mistake
use Maven regularly,
so you'll need to ask someone else about that.)
Note that, while easier to set up, the Maven build is still
experimental. The Ant build is the official one.
Craig McClanahan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
In principle, this makes perfect sense. It'll be easy if
you've split
the MyFaces jars into api and impl classes (like the RI
does), because
then it's just a matter of setting up your own
build.properties file and
defining jsf-api.jar and jsf-impl.jar
Joe Germuska wrote:
This is a Chicken and an an Egg situation. Not enough people use
Validator standalone for it to be promoted. Validator 1.1.3 only
works with a nightly build of Struts. So to get the required number
of users Validator will need in a released version of Struts to get
the
Don Brown wrote:
With my extra day off today, I took a look at ways to simplify
Struts. Having been impressed by the simplicity of NanoWeb, I
particularly looked at ways to change the Struts concept of Actions
and ActionForwards to support POJO's and configurations that allow new
actions to
Ted Husted wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:41:13 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
Can whoever is going to be release manager for this confirm the version numbers?
Did you want to go ahead and do it, Craig?
There are other things I really should be doing right now, but no one else
Matthias Weßendorf wrote:
see
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces/
the nightly build is empty again,
so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build
successful?
The 20040706 build was successful.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi, i tried the faces-struts-lib with RI.
It works.
Matthias,
Could you please explain in more detail exactly what appears to you to
be a bug in the struts-faces library that requires this wrapper, and
also what unspecified behavior in the RI is being relied on?
James Holmes wrote:
Just curious if these changes fix the problem with the broken s:base tag?
Basically the tag was outputting and invalid href attribute on the
generated base tag.
This is a problem almost everyone was experiencing. Myself included.
Sorry to be dense, but *what* broken output?
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Craig,
i tried the struts-faces-example with myfaces
and RI (worked out of the box)
this happens with myfaces:
i clicked LINK editRegistration.do?action=Create
and become IllegalArgumentException:
could not find pathMapping for servletPath = /editRegistration.do
it a try?
-James
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:33 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/taglib
AbstractFacesTag.java
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 12:41 AM -0700 7/6/04, Craig McClanahan wrote:
I've updated my nightly build script (effective with the 20040706
build) to use the following dependnet libraries, which I'm assuming
corresponds to what we'll actually use in a Struts 1.2.1 release. Can
whoever is going
James Mitchell wrote:
I have known Bill for a few years and he is definitely committer material.
He has contributed in numerous ways to this community and others. I owe him
a great deal for his help with our local Struts Users group, founded in
Atlanta (ASUG) http://www.struts-atlanta.org. He
In catching up on back email, I noticed a piece of advice about where to
put interim builds that should be made available to the public for
review, but are not official signed releases (which would go to
http://www.apache.org/dist). The suggestion from infrastructure was to use:
My thoughts below.
Joe Germuska wrote:
I'm bringing this thread over to the dev list because it's fairly
technical and boring to the average user.
I went ahead and set up the nightly builds Maven repository with
Struts 1.2.1 -- see http://cvs.apache.org/repository/struts/
I tried to flesh out
Joe Germuska wrote:
Apropos of the earlier discussion about Maven repositories and such,
I'm going to try to spend at least a couple of hours staking out a new
CVS repository for struts-as-TLP. I'm going to try to set up a
local repository on my machine with a copy of /home/cvs/jakarta-struts
Martin Cooper wrote:
3) Given the factoring into sub-projects that we want to do, we'll no
doubt be making extensive use of Maven's multi-project capabilities.
It would be nice to know what that actually means, especially in terms
of constraints. (I'm afraid I don't have much of a clue, so I'm
Michael McGrady wrote:
I am trying to build Struts via CVS in order to get my hands dirty
with a bit of assistance in documentation. I am having one difficulty
(error) with the build. The error is:
[javac] ^
[javac]
Martin Cooper wrote:
In the wake (or perhaps midst?) of the recent spam on the Struts wiki,
and numerous other wikis at Apache, I plan to ask infra@ to restrict
changes to the Struts wiki to registered users only.
+1
Craig
-
To
Folks who are planning to work with struts-chain (both for use inside
Struts and for your own command chains) will enjoy a usability
improvement that I just added to commons-chain. It'll be available in
tonight's nightly commons-chain build, or you can get it now in CVS.
Craig
Here's another crack at trying to get us moving forwards on the
repository reorg. Given the feedback of our most recent discussions,
I'd like to focus on the following motivations for a particular decision
on the organization of the repository, followed by what seems to make
sense based on
[snip]
We might want to start by getting the struts-core and struts-site building first.
Site would have a number of under-construction links at first, which would go away
as each subproject came online. What's in the other subprojects then defined by what
is not in the core. (And for now,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 06:53:04 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:21:52 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
(BTW, that's something I think we should develop a policy on, so
that we're not seen as making arbitrary decisions in this area, but
that's another topic entirely.)
project
http://sourceforge.net/projects/myfaces, which just got accepted in
to the Apache incubator.
Regards,
Jacob
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:13 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: JSF vs Struts
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:34:52 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niallp
Date: 2004-07-22 15:34:51 -0500 (Thu, 22 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 3990
Modified:
trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/FormTag.java
Log:
Modified:
them) -- the people who answer questions (as well as create Struts)
are all volunteers.
Matt Bathje
Craig McClanahan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:49:38 +0100, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see this as a big issue and my intention was more of polite
request rather than reprimand - although it may not have come accross
that way. Seems to me that in a large and (hopefully) expanding community
there
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:31:27 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:14:15 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
I also suspect, given our track record :-), that re-engineering
Struts from scratch based on the latest platform APIs wouldn't take
more time than a gradual
On 1 Sep 2004 11:34:00 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
niallp 2004/09/01 04:34:00
Modified:contrib/struts-faces/web/example logon.jsp mainMenu.jsp
registration.jsp subscription.jsp
contrib/struts-faces/web/example2
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 09:56:41 -0500, David Durham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Mitchell wrote:
That would be a bad mistake. How many products do you know that have a 1.5
minimum requirement?
If we're talking about Struts 2.0, it's not actually a product yet, so
it's purely speculation.
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 18:45:22 -0400, Deadman, Hal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe Craig's point was that you could put two copies of the tld in the jar's
META-INF, one with the old URI and one with the new. The tlds would be otherwise
identical but auto-discovery would work no matter what URI
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:50:30 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:13:21 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:28:42 -0700 (PDT), Martin Cooper wrote:
* CVS freeze/tag date: Friday, September 3rd @ 6pm (Pacific time).
Following
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 19:06:44 -0400, Frank Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ironic as it seems to myself to be saying it, I don't think I like the idea
of Struts moving to newer spec/JDK versions just yet.
Here at work, most of our development is now Struts-based, and much of it is
moving to
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 01:10:43 +0100, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with what Vic said in this thread on the Servlet Spec issue - if we
can take the Servlet version out of the equation so that any version can be
plugged in to the core controller than that would be really good.
On 3 Sep 2004 01:38:30 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31021.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 06:29:59 -0700 (PDT), David Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Either it could be developed with compatibility to existing JDK versions
and
keep everyone happy. or go with JDK 1.5 and my preferernce would be to
go to
JDK 1.5 and use all those favorite-new-features.
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 15:31:04 -0400, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last I heard, Ted setup a test subversion repository and everyone seemed
happy with it. Is there anything stopping plans to go ahead and migrate
our CVS repository?
That's a MME (merely a matter of effort :-) task. I've
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:23:57 -0400, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose we migrate our current CVS repository to Subversion as soon as
the infrastructure team is available to assist, giving at least a week
to ensure all outstanding CVS commits are made. A test Subversion
migration
Thanks for your comments, Michael. If you've been following the dev
list lately, you've seen some beginning discussions on a Struts 2.0
rearchitecting that would indeed leverage everything we've all learned
in the four years since Struts was first created. I have some
specific proposals to make
It is certainly feasible to do either, but I think you're making the
right call on adding explanation about your patches in the bug report.
Assume that committer who reviews a bug report will certainly read
the entire set of comments on that particular report; but it's less
likely that they will
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:37:00 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should realise that no wiki page is owned by any one person more
than any other, regardless of who creates it. Once created, it is
community owned, and any member of the community is free to add their
changes in
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 05:07:32 +, liu ji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you.
I know filter can do this very well.But filter have some drawbacks.I don't
know how to express this,because of my poor English.
Without struts,I can use a single filter to delegate the request to my
access control
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 08:29:20 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 21:06:44 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
... Interestingly, this subproject has four subsubprojects ...
Are you counting the MailReader database as a separate artifact?
I hadn't been
Unfortunately, I had scheduling conflicts so I'm going to miss this one :-(.
Craig
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:20:56 -0700, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any Struts committers planning on attending ApacheCon? If so, how about
the Hackathon? I'll be there and am anxious to have lively
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:23:32 +0200, Anders Steinlein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive my possible ignorance, but what is the policy on new releases?
I've understood that we can release whenever we want, that version numbers
are cheap and that you vote whether to make a release alpha/beta/GA.
The hackathon is typically a conference room at the hotel where
ApacheCon will be held, and offers an opportunity for committers on
the various Apache projects to get together and hack on code face to
face, or otherwise get to know each other better. Historically it's
been held on the Saturday
him a Guiness (or three) at
ApacheCon :)
Ah, Guinness - the ultimate currency. You got yourself a deal.
Don
-Ted.
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:45:58 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:23:32 +0200, Anders Steinlein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Just starting to play with the proposed patch now, but to answer your
question ...
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:17:35 -0700, Ben Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other thing - I finally got example1 working, but I had to add
validator-rules.xml, which was absent. This needs to be there,
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 04:15:02 +0100, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realise that people are keen to get on with a release, but it would be my
preference if we could delay to include the above.
The other way to think about it is to aim these changes and new
features at a 1.2.6
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:40:45 -0700, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there aren't any objections, I will ask infrastructure to perform the
actual conversion of Struts from CVS to Subversion. The test conversion
has been up for over a week, and there haven't been any problems.
Again, if
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:10:38 -0700, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I should have clarified, I'm giving the go-ahead on performing
the actual conversion the exactly same way the test conversion was done
- the full conversion. All branches and tags will be converted. After
the
You cannot *imagine* how many people have asked me to clarify this
relationship :-).
I hope this blog entry helps, but (as I noted) the future of Struts is
decided here, not by anything I, or anyone else, might opine
elsewhere.
Craig
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:15:57 -0400, Thomas L Roche [EMAIL
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:07:06 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are referring to Martin's DownloadAction I believe... Note that he
didn't place it in the action package, he placed it in the actions
package. It's a subtle difference, but an important one. As I
understand
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:08:36 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, I didn't know about the saveErrors method. That completely
invalidates my entire concern. Thank you! I figured I was either on to
something or was about to learn something, and I kinda figured it would
be the
I'm +1 for $Id$.
Craig
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:21:59 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like we'll need to change the keywords, since SVN uses a
different set. ;-( The SVN keywords are documented here:
I've taken advantage of the new capabilities that Subversion provides
for refactoring, to set up struts-faces as a top-level subproject with
the ability to create its own release artifact. Interestingly, this
subproject has four subsubprojects that provide its content as well,
so the top-level
The Maven-based build scripts are still under development. The
official method to build struts is still Ant. You'll need to
configure a build.properties file that points at where you've
downloaded and installed the dependencies -- see
build.properties.sample for a sample of what will be needed.
+1 on the test build then vote to rank approach that Tomcat uses.
As an additional clarification, I presume that we will want the same
release process for any subproject releases? This is becoming timely
as the opportunity for a 1.0.1 release of struts-faces draws nigh. It
might be worth
bug-free beta software? For that matter,
have you ever experienced bug-free software at all? ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:25 PM
Subject
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:39:44 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:28:29 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:47:56 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
When we first started discussing changes to the way we build and
release Struts, the
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:38:15 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(BTW, I'm more than a little surprised at the amount of energy you're
putting into this, Ted, given that you've told us all you're going
Emeritus anyway, so that those of us remaining will be the folks
rolling the
I'd definitely like to see the code.
Craig
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:07:25 -0400, Sean Schofield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[follow-up to a discussion from the user list]
I think I have a potential solution to a problem I've been having
trying to integrate JSF and Tiles. At first I tried
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:57:20 -0500, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola Amigos!
AFAICT this is an issue only in the html:form tag. If we were to introduce
something to trigger XHTML 1.1, couldn't we just lie to validator about the name
by telling it the ID instead of the name? Would
Just time for a couple of notes this morning.
I'm +0 on JDK 5.0 (nee 1.5) depending on how long we really think this
is going to take. The struts core part of this isn't really huge or
complicated, but asking a Struts developer for a timeline is probably
a silly thing to do :-).
Other comments
I think we want to reward people who are helping us test the non-GA
releases as well, by delinieating the dot-dot changes separately.
That still gives people who want the whole picture what they need:
Changes in version 1.2.6:
* ...
* ...
Changes in version 1.2.5:
* ...
* ...
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:48:33 -0700, Michael McGrady
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
OK Craig didn't say it was JSF only - but that was my interpretation of
the likely direction.
He said The interface as currently defined is not dependent on JSF but
then went on to say that
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:20:13 -0400, Thomas L Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering: how does Shale relate to struts-chain? E.g.
* Would Shale subsume struts-chain?
It would likely subsume *struts*-chain, but not *commons*-chain (see below).
* Is struts-chain for 1.x and Shale for
FWIW, the Geronimo repository has a snapshot of Servlet 2.4:
http://svn.apache.org/repository/geronimo-spec/jars/geronimo-spec-servlet-2.4-SNAPSHOT.jar
Craig
On 27 Oct 2004 14:43:03 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: germuska
Date: Wed Oct 27 07:43:03 2004
New
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:07:09 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday, as advertised, the Shale API built without any external dependencies
(whatsoever).
Today, the new implementations require dependencies on Servlet 2.4, JSF, and Commons
Logging.
But, I can't get it to
Apache does indeed have Apache-licensed versions of the servet 2.4
(and JSP 2.0) API classes. The ones that are shipped with Tomcat 5.x
are in cvs repository jakarta-servletapi-5. I would imagine we
could just get the Tomcat folks to post those JARs to ibiblio or
something. Isn't that just a
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:01:39 -0700 (PDT), Scott Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
With this in mind, my proposal for a useful and
demonstrative application would be the result of
porting/supporting NetBeans' web application
development APIs and relevant visual components to a
JSR 168
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:08:40 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:50:05 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
My personal itch is to not have to build everything from scratch --
its to build on the JSF request processing lifecycle, without
committing you to any
Oops ... meant to reply to both Jack and the list.
Craig
-- Forwarded message --
From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:19:48 -0700
Subject: Re: Struts Shale
To: Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 06:51:32 -0700, Dakota Jack [EMAIL
JSF can be plugged in, perhaps with adapters, as an option well as
other alternatives? This too is not a rhetorical question.
Jack
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:16:56 -0700, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:08:40 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:30:33 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:57:15 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
... that we rename the package called impl as faces.
As to the impl package:
I think what really bothers me here is that the classes implemented here are not
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:27:49 -0700, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I admit to a huge amount of ignorance about JSF. I have partly been
stymied by an inability to decide on a text to read. I have always
liked Hans work, and may go that direction. I cannot know, of course,
how that
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:22:09 +0200, Anders Steinlein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3.1 Java2 Standard Edition APIs
I'd be +1 for J2SE 5.0
Although I have no real saying in this, I am +1 on J2SE 5.0 as well. As I
would anticipate 1-2 years in development on Struts 2.x, J2SE 5.0 should
be
Shouldn't commons-collections.jar be removed from all our build.xml
files as well? That's what my nightly build executes.
Craig
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 05:20:11 +0100, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig,
I've updated the docs, can you change the nightly build to include beanutils
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:30:22 -0600, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless Martin is incorrect about the way JSF handles requests, I'm inclined
to believe (despite the fact JSF will be a part of the next specification)
we might want to consider using something else under the covers in our
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:43:41 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a really interesting statement. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I've
always thought the whole point of JSF was visual components. Yet the
statement above clearly indicates that JSF goes well beyond that
charter, and
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:26:45 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a perfect world...
svn.apache.org/asf/struts
/core
/trunk
/branches
/tags
/faces
/trunk
/branches
/tags
/bsf
/trunk
/branches
/tags
/flow
/trunk
I've adjusted the nightly build scripts to account for the
reorganization of our Subversion repository that was recently done,
and caused last night's build (20041114) to break. Tonight's should
be fine. Nightly builds of the core Struts distribution are at:
Struts Core Distribution:
Miscellaneous comments inline.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:48:39 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I read the docs on subversion about Shale.
Well, a very interessting point.
However, I asked myself how it is related
to Struts/Commons - Chain. (The Proposal aka
To help the folks who want to explore the Shale proposal, but haven't
had a chance to get hooked up with the SVN repository source code,
nightly builds of the following artifacts are being generated into
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-shale/:
*
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:44:47 -0700, BaTien Duong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings:
I want to prototype commons-chain in shale. I saw 2 apps: agility and
mailreader. I was able to build commons-chain.jar using ant. I modify
maven project.xml of the 2 apps and run maven default successfully.
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:52:51 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I would be in favor of immediately branching at 1.2.6, regardless, so we can
start on 1.3.x. If there are any straggling issues with the 1.2.x build, I'd
be happy to cross-commit between the 1.2.x and 1.3.x
The page navigation *mechanism* in JSF is pluggable -- you need to
provide an implementation of
javax.faces.application.NavigationHandler, which could then do
things like look at Struts action mappings to figure out where to go
next, instead of (or in addition to) the JSF navigation-rule stuff.
Double check that you've got the latest BeanUtils code (1.7.0) in your
build properties -- this has the lazy stuff plus FashHashMap, which
was added to [beanutils] specifically so we could undo the linkage to
[collections].
Craig
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:11:30 -0800, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Struts nightly build contains whatever the result of running ant
clean dist in the struts/core/trunk directory produces. Until now,
that hasn't included Struts Chain, but that's easy to fix.
In the mean time, there is a nightly build of Struts Chain being
produced separately:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:58:11 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good. I would take it a step further, and, if no init parameter,
look for the chain config as /chain-config.xml, making it possible to
provide an intelligent default. We could then, take your idea in #3,
and
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:26:16 -0600, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would plugins work with the chain configuration?
I've written ActionServlet/RequestProcessor extensions and plugins in
the past. Often, the reason is to inject custom pre-, actual, or
post-processing at specific
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:20:02 -0600, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to have a hook into processValidate() on validation failure.
Currently that can only be done by copy-and-pasting the processValidate()
method from RequestProcessor into a subclass and sticking a hook into the
1 - 100 of 805 matches
Mail list logo
