Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi, all, On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:27 PM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 28/10/20 14:35 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jonathan Wakely: On 28/10/20 13:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jonathan Wakely: Dropping GCC 11 into rawhide now would mean I can't make certain ABI-breaking changes to the C++20 library in upstream GCC, because it would be landing on real

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/28/20 7:29 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28/10/20 13:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Jonathan Wakely: >> >>> Dropping GCC 11 into rawhide now would mean I can't make certain >>> ABI-breaking changes to the C++20 library in upstream GCC, because it >>> would be landing on real users'

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

* Jonathan Wakely: > On 28/10/20 13:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >>* Jonathan Wakely: >> >>> Dropping GCC 11 into rawhide now would mean I can't make certain >>> ABI-breaking changes to the C++20 library in upstream GCC, because it >>> would be landing on real users' machines. Which means I

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 28/10/20 13:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jonathan Wakely: Dropping GCC 11 into rawhide now would mean I can't make certain ABI-breaking changes to the C++20 library in upstream GCC, because it would be landing on real users' machines. Which means I lose several weeks of GCC's stage 1

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

* Jonathan Wakely: > Dropping GCC 11 into rawhide now would mean I can't make certain > ABI-breaking changes to the C++20 library in upstream GCC, because it > would be landing on real users' machines. Which means I lose several > weeks of GCC's stage 1 development. No thanks. This is for C++20

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 23/10/20 13:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:07 PM Clement Verna wrote: On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early > development_ work in Fedora

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:20 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Saturday, 24 October 2020 at 12:28, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > [...] > > On top of generic sidetag functionality, ELN has additional features > > like automated continuous rebuilds of Rawhide packages, regular > >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Saturday, 24 October 2020 at 12:28, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: [...] > On top of generic sidetag functionality, ELN has additional features > like automated continuous rebuilds of Rawhide packages, regular > composes and container builds[1], and people watching after them. > Note that we have

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

* Jakub Jelinek: > The thing is that GCC is a moving target at that point, while you can fix up > packages to deal with GCC at certain date, in a week or two you might need > to do it again, or there could be ABI changes etc. > Which is why I'm suggesting at least end of GCC stage1, which still

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:43 PM Neal Gompa wrote: ..skipped.. > There's actually nothing wrong with this idea in itself, because at > the crux of it is that there is a desire to have a side-tag to build > gcc11 with a limited compose to regression test and further evaluate > the development of

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 9:58 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 20:36, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 10/23/20 8:01 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 14:45, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > [...] > > And as I've mentioned

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:27 PM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is defined as the

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 22:42, Neal Gompa wrote: [...] > And there is *nothing* that stops the Change process for working in a > rolling context other than people don't think of doing it. > > There's actually nothing wrong with this idea in itself, because at > the crux of it is that there

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 19:06, Clement Verna wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early > > > development_ work in Fedora can happen without your

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 4:05 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 19:55, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:07 PM Clement Verna >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> >> >> On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 19:55, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:07 PM Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >> > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 20:36, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/23/20 8:01 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 14:45, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: [...] > And as I've mentioned before on this thread, we're trying to figure out > how to drop that change in earlier

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/23/20 5:55 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 14:28, Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: > > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/23/20 8:01 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 14:45, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > [...] >> You can blame me for being not clear enough, if you want, but I'd >> rather move on and use the current GCC11 work as an example which >> shows the real power of

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:07 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: >> > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early >> > development_ work in Fedora can happen without your decision

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early > > development_ work in Fedora can happen without your decision on it. > > I except (and accept) that most of the development work

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early development_ work in Fedora can happen without your decision on it. I except (and accept) that most of the development work in Fedora happens without my decision on it. I would like

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 14:45, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: [...] > You can blame me for being not clear enough, if you want, but I'd > rather move on and use the current GCC11 work as an example which > shows the real power of the ELN proposal, and the real benefit for > Fedora which it

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi! On Thursday, 22 October 2020 at 14:27, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. Was this discussed

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

- Original Message - > From: "Aleksandra Fedorova" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 2:45:41 PM > Subject: Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot > ahead of Rawhide > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:40 PM

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:40 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/23/20 11:52 AM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 10/22/20 6:33 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 14:28, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is defined as the

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 11:52, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/22/20 6:33 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: [...] > > > I'll reiterate: > > > > > > We don't want to fork packages from the Fedora Rawhide. We don't > > > want to provide

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/23/20 11:52 AM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/22/20 6:33 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, Vit. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Dne 22. 10. 20 v 18:33 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a): On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, Vit. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there you

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/22/20 6:33 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >>> Hi, Vit. > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/23/20 10:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:37:29AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: But I very much agree that GCC should be moving into rawhide earlier than has been done in the past.  In an ideal world it would have gone in just after F33 branched and updated

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:37:29AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > But I very much agree that GCC should be moving into rawhide earlier > > than has been done in the past.  In an ideal world it would have gone in > > just after F33 branched and updated regularly. > > Big +1 on that. > > Right

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 7:28 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: I do not think the Fedora Change process applies to parts of %{?rhel} conditionals that are inactive in Fedora. Except that they apply in Fedora ELN now. And since this *will* affect Fedora contributors, I belive that it should follow Fedora

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 5:06 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/22/20 6:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, all, this is the informational message, no action required. Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to switch ELN buildroot to

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:28 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Miro Hrončok: > > >> It is also not the only one, which we can handle through ELN. We were > >> considering the update of the baseline of the x86 cpu's to be such a > >> feature, but then it was discarded. The other example would be the

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

* Miro Hrončok: >> It is also not the only one, which we can handle through ELN. We were >> considering the update of the baseline of the x86 cpu's to be such a >> feature, but then it was discarded. The other example would be the >> Default Module Streams setup. > > Should we expect an eln

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 6:33 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, Vit. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there you have

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, Vit. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there > >> you have it [1]. So what is the current

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 9:28 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:20:28AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 10/22/20 8:27 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:10:02AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: I do think we need to make it easier for a Fedora package maintainer to get the

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:20:28AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 10/22/20 8:27 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:10:02AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > >> I do think we need to make it easier for a Fedora package maintainer to > >> get the gcc-11 bits so that if there's a need to

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 8:27 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:10:02AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> I do think we need to make it easier for a Fedora package maintainer to >> get the gcc-11 bits so that if there's a need to debug a bad interaction >> between gcc-11 and a package they can. >> >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > New GCC releases almost always trigger new compile warnings or bugs > in code. So by pushing GCC 11 into ELN, it feels like we're making > it much more likely that ELN builds will fail, and now Fedora > maintainers have to debug ELN specific problems that won't

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:10:02AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > I do think we need to make it easier for a Fedora package maintainer to > get the gcc-11 bits so that if there's a need to debug a bad interaction > between gcc-11 and a package they can. > gcc-11 was built into a side tag. Each build

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi, Jeff, On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:14 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 10/22/20 8:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >> Hi, Daniel, > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > >> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Oct

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:15 AM Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/22/20 8:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > As Fedora maintainer I've been sent details of ELN failures / bugs, and > > asked to deal with fixes for ELN branches, so there's clearly an expectation > > placed on Fedora maintainers to be

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:10 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Expectations for Fedora maintainers does not change. > > ELN is a development playground. Think about sidetag, with slightly > > better automation around it. > > >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 8:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: >> Hi, Daniel, >> >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, all,

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:06 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 9:03 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 22.10.2020 14:53, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > Why are you not just doing this in Rawhide? > > > > Finally they made the right decision. F32 was built by a completely > >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 7:00 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: >> Hi, all, >> >> this is the informational message, no action required. >> >> Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to >> switch ELN buildroot to use

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, Daniel, > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > > Hi, all, > > > > > > this is the informational message, no action

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 6:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: >> Hi, all, >> >> this is the informational message, no action required. >> >> Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to >> switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi, Daniel, On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, all, > > > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 7:02 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:54 PM Neal Gompa > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > mailto:al...@bookwar.info>> wrote: > > > > Hi, all, > > > > this is the informational

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 9:03 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 22.10.2020 14:53, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Why are you not just doing this in Rawhide? > > Finally they made the right decision. F32 was built by a completely > broken version of GCC, full of regressions. > > As a Fedora

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, Vit. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there you have it [1]. So what is the current stance on this topic? You were asking for a branch to overcome the issue

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 22.10.2020 14:53, Neal Gompa wrote: Why are you not just doing this in Rawhide? Finally they made the right decision. F32 was built by a completely broken version of GCC, full of regressions. As a Fedora maintainer, I don't want to be a GCC alpha tester again, even in Rawhide. Release

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:54 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: > > > > Hi, all, > > > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > > switch ELN buildroot

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is defined as the

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi, Vit. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there > you have it [1]. So what is the current stance on this topic? You were asking for a branch to overcome the issue with building a package in ELN. And we have a

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there you have it [1]. So what is the current stance on this topic? Vít [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/commits/eln Dne 22. 10. 20 v 14:27 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a): Hi, all, this is the informational

[ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi, all, this is the informational message, no action required. Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. Though ELN is defined as the buildroot where Fedora Rawhide code is rebuilt into EL-like environment, in