Or, Scott, try Google with airmail agwpe there are many links to
answer your question several ways.
73,
Chuck AA5J
Gary wrote:
Scott,
Take a look here. Question #3015
http://www.winlink.org/faq http://www.winlink.org/faq
73,
Gary N7XOO
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
So, is this discussion off topic or what? This must be the 50th time
that I have had to delete this same discussion. What say you give it a
rest?
Please?
Chuck AA5J
Rick W wrote:
Hi Stelios,
The reason you may not have heard from others with their difficulties
with Linux, is that they
Kim
My guess is that 20-30 watts out is all you will be able to get and have
your signal remain linear. Make sure you have zero ALC.
73,
Chuck AA5J
Kim wrote:
I am using my new old Ten Tec 540 in digital mode. What I am finding
is I am only able to get 20-30 watts out due to my sound card
I only wish Yahoo would find another sponser for the group.
What happened to all the good information in the files section?
What happened to all the good information in the posts?
Who actually owns the posts by group members?
Are we all to be punished?
John, Exactly how does one actually contact
Aha! I get the point. I was thinking 'casual' and you were thinking
'competitive'. Sorry for the QRM. :-[
Michael Keane K1MK wrote:
On 9/28/2008 9:04 PM, Chuck Mayfield wrote:
Are you picking Nits? You actually want all the software developers
except three to make modifications for 85
Rick,
Are you picking Nits? You actually want all the software developers
except three to make modifications for 85 Hz?
Oh, say, does everyone know which is the Mark and which is the Space?
On twenty meters you are talking about the 5th and 6th decimal places.
14.08 vs 14.080085 MHz.
Give me
Mark Thompson wrote:
http://www.popular-communications.com/PC%20Highlights%20Sept%2008.html
TECH SHOWCASE
The SignaLink USB Interface—A Plug-And-Play Solution For Digital
Communications Modes
by John Kasupski, KC2HMZ
Anyone who has experimented with receiving digital format signals by
Tom Tcimpidis wrote:
As an engineer who designed RF systems in a place far away and long ago,
the cost of switching 100 watts of RF electronically as opposed to a
fast relay device is MUCH higher.
Most Amateurs simply would not want to pay the price of fast
all-electronic switching when
experimenting with such proposals?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Chuck Mayfield - AA5J wrote:
Bill Vodall WA7NWP wrote:
Phil's paper is from many years ago but the reality is that there
was no
further movement away from the legacy AX.25 equipment toward a new
layer, much less toward a completely new
Bill Vodall WA7NWP wrote:
Phil's paper is from many years ago but the reality is that there was no
further movement away from the legacy AX.25 equipment toward a new
layer, much less toward a completely new protocol.
There is some movement...
Check out:
FX.25 - Forward Error
Rud Merriam wrote:
I suggest anyone interested in this topic start by reading
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/2504/http:zSzzSzpeople.qualcomm.
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/2504/http:zSzzSzpeople.qualcomm.
comzSzkarnzSzpaperszSznewlinkpaper.pdf/karn94toward.pdf by
Rud Merriam wrote:
You mention protocol layers. Which model do you want to use for
discussion,
OSI or the Internet model? Perhaps not a big question since layers 1
2 are
the same but once we start moving up the stack they differ.
I have a problem with the formatting on this
Do not laugh. It could come to pass that we (mankind) will need to
reinvent spark gap.Who knows what evil lurks in the minds
Chuck AA5J
At 02:39 PM 6/1/2008, Jack Hamilton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:07:17 -0400, Paul L Schmidt, K9PS
mailto:k9ps%40arrl.net[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
At 12:48 PM 4/12/2008, expeditionradio wrote:
New 10MHz Ham Digi Band Research Survey Chart
10140kHz to 10150kHz Digital/Auto Sub-Band
Click here:
http://hflink.com/bandplans/10mhz/http://hflink.com/bandplans/10mhz/
73 Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA
What was the question that was answered to make the chart?
Speaking of page 35, Is anyone using Outpost with soundcard?
Chuck AA5J
Is your display LCD or CRT?
In my experience, CRT displays are sometimes a major source.
dmitry_d2d wrote:
1. A few words about OFDM and serial tone modem.
Let's find out how the fight between ISI and Doppler shift
takes place in these systems. OFDM uses the great number of low
speed channels so the symbol duration increases. While the
duration of ISI is much smaller than symbol
Harry Wiliford wrote:
[edit] Etymology
The word data is the plural of Latin datum, neuter past participle of
dare, to give, hence something given. The past participle of to
give has been used for millennia, in the sense of a statement accepted
at face value; one of the works of Euclid, circa
This is getting ridiculous! It takes me nearly 10 seconds to say
This is AA5J Is the frequency in use?
At 09:57 AM 1/13/2008, Rick wrote:
My preference would have been for those who want to operate these kinds
of modes to request an interpretation and if the finding was not to
their satisfaction, to petition the FCC for a rule change. They did not
do this and now some of us have had to take action
I certainly agree. Now, given the FCC's position, why do we amateurs need all
the activist lawyers and lawyer-wannabes from our ranks sending
queries to the FCC concerning
practices by other control operators? We are all responsible for our
own operations. Right?
Chuck AA5J
At 10:14 AM
At 10:14 AM 1/13/2008, kh6ty wrote:
PropNet station, and that station *consistently*, and repetitively,
interferes with activity on that frequency, the presumption has to be that
the PropNet operator is either willfully transmitting on top of existing
activity, or lying about being at the control
understanding of why this is done in this manner?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Chuck Mayfield wrote:
At 09:57 AM 1/13/2008, Rick wrote:
My preference would have been for those who want to operate these kinds
of modes to request an interpretation and if the finding was not to
their satisfaction, to petition
At 01:54 PM 1/13/2008, kh6ty wrote:
You obviously do not understand reproprocity principle and how it applies to
radio, Chuck, and in most cases the PropNet station is running less power
than others, or what is the point of using it to determining propagation?
Beacon stations also tend to run
--- In
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
Chuck Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I certainly agree. Now, given the FCC's position, why do we
amateurs need all the activist lawyers and lawyer-wannabes from our
ranks sending queries to the FCC concerning practices by other
--- In
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
Chuck Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 09:57 AM 1/13/2008, Rick wrote:
My preference would have been for those who want to operate these kinds
of modes to request an interpretation and if the finding
At 04:36 PM 1/13/2008, Rick wrote:
Chuck,
Enough of your nonsense! Those of us who want integrity in the amateur
bands are doing our best. You clearly have guilt in what you are doing
and you fear that it will be an illegal activity. Your activities may be
interpreted as perfectly legal ... but
.
Chuck Mayfield wrote:
Yes. Thank you for your very welcome explanation. I guess someone
has to stir the pot, but I was having fun in my ignorance and bliss.
I don't really want anyone to clarify that I can not do something
that I have been doing, just because someone else did not understand
Howard,
Howdy, neighbor.
I have
* an ft857D that I have yet to use except 80m cw.
* computer-ft857 interface that I bought over the internet from BuxComm.
* a 25'-55' teletower.
* an 11 element 2 m antenna somewhere in the back yard
* the windoze version of NBEMS, and
* a
Hi Michael,
I used one of those many years ago with first a Commodore Pet and then
an Osborne One. My recollection is that the unit operates with any
RS-232 terminal program and interfaces through the serial port. Don't
think it takes any special software.
Hope this helps.
73, Chuck - AA5J
Try: http://www.w1khj.com/NBEMS
CHUCK AA5J
At 01:02 PM 1/6/2008, Nick wrote:
Hello Haward,
Happy New Year!
Sorry, http://www.w1khj/NBEMShttp://www.w1khj/NBEMS is not a working link.
Server not found
Firefox can't find the server at www.w1khj.com
73!
Sunday, January 06, 2008, 19:50:52,
Yes, Skip. My bad. You are correct except for the . at the end of
the link vbg
Sorry for the qrm... that is little QRM, like psk31 is
73 Chuck AA5J
At 01:02 PM 1/6/2008, Nick wrote:
Hello Haward,
Happy New Year!
Sorry,
Did you verify the MD5SUM on the .iso file? I would expect a bad download.
It may be a pain, but I would suggest you download again if the
MD5SUM does not compare.
Best regards,
Chuck Mayfield
Success is the ability to go from failure to failure without losing
your enthusiasm.
~ Sir Winston
If it were my station, I would wrap it around a 3 to 4 inch form and
lay it behind the operating table. That would further limit RF noise
and would do no harm to SWR.
Best regards,
Chuck Mayfield
Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both
together go to the making
be nice enoough to
respond, since you took the time to answer my post.
Tnx!
Dave KB3MOW
Chuck Mayfield wrote:
If it were my station, I would wrap it around a 3 to 4 inch form and
lay it behind the operating table. That would further limit RF noise
and would do no harm to SWR.
Best regards
I don't think 10% of each HF ham band is at all
reasonable. Perhaps 10% of each data b
and segment would be more reasonable. Your suggestion for automatic
sub bands would take an unreasonably large part of most data sub bands.
see my notes below in [brackets]]
73,
Chuck Mayfield - AA5J
At 02:13 PM 10/11/2007, n6vl wrote:
I was successful after calling Kantronics. The tech support guy
referred me to the mods.dk web site. I was able to get scanned PDFs
for a small donation.
73,
Steve N6VL
Steve,
I also have a KAM Plus with no manual. I would be eternally grateful
if you
Folks,
[mounting soapbox] when I was young, say 45 years ago, my brothers
and I would be arguing.
One would say Dad, so and so is doing [whatever].
Dad would reply, Do you guys REALLY want me to come in there?
Look. Government toleration of ham radio is good.
Government regulation of ham radio
At 02:04 PM 9/23/2007, WD8ARZ Comcast wrote:
Ham radio today is no doubt 'different' today than it was in the past.
But the past is our history.
Wasn't to many years ago that the purpose of ham radio had a listing in the
FCC rules.
Hobby wasn't the top one listed ..
73 from Bill - WD8ARZ
Bruce,
You might want to post your rant to THE LEAGUE. You are preaching
mostly to the choir here. HI HI
Chuck AA5J
At 11:16 PM 4/27/2007, bruce mallon wrote:
OK
RM-11306 is on the back burner for now what will the
ARRL do next ?
Here is what they SHOULD do ...
ASK with a list of
Try http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/Documentation.htm
73, Chuck, AA5J
At 03:41 PM 4/6/2007, Jose A. Amador wrote:
* TUTORIAL. Study the new tutorial at
http://pulsar.princeton.edu/~joe/K1JT/Tutorial_590.txthttp://pulsar.princeton.edu/~joe/K1JT/Tutorial_590.txt
Got a 404 error on
OK! I have come up with a way to ignore all this spam about politics,
including; ARRL and FCC.
Rule: if header contains [digitalradio] And body contains (ARRL OR
FCC) then delete_message.
Hopefully, I will not miss those messages that actually pertain to
digitalradio.
73, Chuck AA5J
OK this is starting to look like character assassination. Please
excuse me while I still have my character
73, Chuck AA5J
At 01:12 PM 3/18/2007, kv9u wrote:
Bruce,
You have to understand that John and his group have (had?), very
different agendas than most hams, and that includes digitally
for the clock to have
known to change.
My clock does have time zone settings incorporated into the software.
I had to set that up initially.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
Chuck Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wait! WWV and WWVB transmit UTC time
Wait! WWV and WWVB transmit UTC time codes. There is absolutely no
way for either station to 'know' in which time zone your atomic clock
is located. So How could they correct time for DST???
Enlighten me please
73, Chuck/AA5J
At 09:00 PM 3/11/2007, Les Warriner wrote:
Whoops. Yes,
Suggestion: Don't wait for an OO. Look up his call at QRZ.com, get
his phone number, give him a call and talk to him about the
problem. The op probably does not know that he is over-driving his audio.
Chuck AA5J
At 08:00 AM 3/10/2007, Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I was watching a bad PSK31 signal
I don't know that you have seen this link, so
just in case you might be able to get an idea
http://www.winlink.org/Presentations/SCAMPspec.pdf
I KNOW that I could not develop anything based on
it, but perhaps you or someone else on this reflector can.
Chuck AA5J
At 02:43 PM 3/9/2007,
I agree with Joe on this point. Amateur radio has always been self
policing. How can we self police the Pactor operators, automatic or
manually controlled, when even if we spend the big bucks to acquire a
pactor modem, we can not monitor their transmissions? We can not
even know whether the
A list moderator graciously corrected me. Therefore, I retract the
following erroneous statement:
It appears that SCS modems can copy WL2k ARQ transmissions even
though the listener is not an addressee..
I stand corrected.
73,
Chuck AA5J
At 04:49 PM 3/8/2007, Chuck Mayfield wrote:
Amateur
Doc,
Try Google.
*HOKA* Electronic - The Netherlands - HF Data Decoder and Analyzer
http://www.hoka.com/
*HOKA* Electronic, HF Data Communications Consultant, Data Analyzer and
Decoder.
www.*hoka*.com/ - 8kCached
At 03:27 AM 1/30/2007, Rein Couperus wrote:
Everybody with an HF trx and a laptop that has a CD drive and a
soundcard can set up a server and connect it to the internet,
provided the trx has reasonable fequency stability
.
We are planning to include HF forwarding capability in both client and
At 01:25 PM 1/30/2007, Rein Couperus wrote:
M$ gives you windows, Linux gives you as many desktops as you like :))
Rein
Rein,
I am certainly not a fan of M$ or Windows, but M$ Windows is used by
a VERY large percentage of ham radio operators who use computers.
FNPsk runs directly under windows.
Champa wrote:
Chuck,
Guess I am no longer fully qualified as a Ham (HI).
What is a 10-36?
Tnx,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Chuck Mayfield mailto:clmayfield%40verizon.net[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com
At 01:47 PM 1/20/2007, larry allen wrote:
Hi Danny..
The problem we are having is that most of our new hams don't seem to get
on the air...
We have more hams now than ever before yet our bands are quieter than they
have ever been, since the 60's at least
Larry ve3fxq
Look at the competition.
At 11:28 AM 1/19/2007, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote:
You can subscribe to the LinLink E-Mail list at:
http://www.wetnet.net/mailman/listinfo/linlink/http://www.wetnet.net/mailman/listinfo/linlink/
That's good Walt. I thought I was subscribed to that linkink list,
but the last message
At 12:13 PM 1/12/2007, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote:
For some reason I can't get the latest information on PSKMail...actually
I think the pskmail.org URL and some others are being blocked. The last
I info I have is from Rein is dated Aug 2005.
Am I correct in that PSKMail is now using
Did I get bounced or something?
I received my last [digitalradio] message at 6:12pm 1/4 .
Chuck AA5J
mulveyraa2 wrote: -- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield - AA5J
You're not reading the error message it gave you. It says that
Call sign, DXCC Entity and QSO date range don't match up. Note the
and. Your submission indicates that you've held
Adrian,
I googled optoisolators Ireland and Radionics Ireland has them in stock.
73, Chuck, AA5J
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I'm surprised that of all the Olivia QSOs I have logged there are only
5 verified via LOTW
I think I can understand why. Why does it have to be so complicated to
get a cert with lotw?
Chuck, aa5j
PS I am debating whether or not it is more trouble than it is worth,
Doc,
I don't agree with your last.
CW DATA AND RTTY are allowed by Extra Class licensees 7000-7125 and by
General
and Advanced Class licensees 7025-7125.
Chuck, AA5J
/group/DXandTalk
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Mayfield - AA5J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:clmayfield%40verizon.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] LOTW Olivia, not a lot !
Andrew
Robert Chudek - KØRC wrote:
Chuck,
I will venture a guess you are using a trial version of the software
because that is what I am hearing the voice say in the file you posted.
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
- Original Message -
*From:* Chuck Mayfield - AA5J mailto:[EMAIL
Robert Chudek - KØRC wrote:
Chuck,
Well even with the new email header, the voice is still saying
Trial... Trial... ;-)
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
- Original Message -
*From:* Chuck Mayfield - AA5J mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Brett Owen Rees VK2TMG wrote:
Hi Chuck,
The attachment worked ok here for me. The sound seems to be saying
'trial' in a female voice. It sounds like a piece of applications
software or your driver is doing this. Have you tried killing off
processes using task manager to see if you can
What is the signal that occupies 3990 to 4000?
Robert McGwier wrote:
Is it heard at night? Then I am going to guess that it is digital
radio mondial broadcast.
Bob
N4HY
Chuck Mayfield - AA5J wrote:
What is the signal that occupies 3990 to 4000?
--
AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,
TAPR, Packrats
It seems to me that the IARU Region 2 bandplan should at least be
consulted as part of the subject process..
See http://www.iaru-regionii.org/Region_2_HF_Band_Plan.html.
73 de AA5J
Danny Douglas wrote:
As to the 160 meter band, I was taken aback by your comment about
operating
digital
At 06:41 AM 9/21/2006, you wrote:
Rick,
Please explain group delays. I am unfamilar with that term in
reference to transmitting equipment.
Walt/K5YFW
I am not Rick, but you can find the definition here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_delay
Regards,
Chuck AA5J
Need a Digital mode
So what is techincal about this thread at this point. Dave, you are
wasting bandwidth here.
Can we get back on topic, please?
Chuck, AA5J
At 11:22 PM 8/25/2006, you wrote:
Amateur radio began with the randomness of chance QSOs -- you
remember CQ, don't you? Its not exactly honest to claim
and misrepresentations unchallenged would be
irresponsible.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
Chuck Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So what is techincal about this thread at this point. Dave, you
are
wasting bandwidth here.
Can we get back on topic
At 08:59 AM 7/25/2006, you wrote:
Anyway where did that word [robustness] come from and when was it frist to
used?
Robust
Insensitivity of a process output to the variation of the process inputs.
Robust Process
A robust process is one that is operating at 6 sigma and is therefore
resistant to
At 07:07 AM 3/4/2006, Rein wrote:
The only thing you have to do to allow PSKmail access is to open WINLINK
for POP3. By the way, PSKmail works also with your own ISP, so it
actually does not need WINLINK. You could use any Gmail account for
that, provided it is properly spam filtered.
I am not
At 12:47 PM 3/3/2006, Tim wrote:
N6CRR,
I agree with you.
tim ab0wr
On Thursday 02 March 2006 23:15, N6CRR wrote:
//snip//
Actually, I think is is a rather good development.
//snip//
I agree with you and Tim. I also think WINLINK and WINLINK 2000 are
good for amateur radio. Maybe not for
He who tries to inflict political statements on amateur radio is a DAMN FOOL.
73,
Chuck, AA5J
At 02:26 PM 2/26/2006, you wrote:
Its because the ARRL has gone nuts, like Bush.
73 de WB4M
Buddy
Regards,
ChuckM mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/~clmayfield
Greetings,
As one who has been inactive in amateur radio emergency
communications for several years, I heartily endorse the use of the
Winlink system for EMCOMM. The reasons are as follows:
Winlink 2000 tries to have 24/7 availability. And mostly succeeds,
through the use of Automatic /
As a former user of a BUD (big ugly dish) of 10' diameter and analog
TV signals, I can say for sure that there is absolutely no comparison
with respect to video quality between the broadcast quality (eg., 34
dB SNR) video signal as received by the BUD and those transmitted by
typical digital
Could not open connection to the host on port 23: Connect failed
Chuck - AA5J
At 07:30 PM 1/14/2006, you wrote:
If you have a chance to try connecting to
Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
I would appreciate it. I am not sure I fixed the problem but I have
at least got outgoing things such as
It works now.
Chuck AA5J
At 08:40 PM 1/14/2006, you wrote:
Just changed settings again...fire away
Andy K3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could not open connection to the host on port 23: Connect failed
Chuck - AA5J
At 07:30 PM 1/14
I have been reading the mail here for some time. Can a station using
equipment that is not computer
controlled (e.g., Ten Tec Omni) use PCALE in any way? I have been
inactive in ham radio since the early 90's and have fallen way behind the
power curve.
73,
Chuck AA5J
--
No virus found
/30/05, you wrote:
Can it scan channels in memory ?
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PCALE, Use of, With ca 1980 transceivers
I have been reading the mail
Regards,
Chuck Mayfield
-- http://wc.rootsweb.com/~clmayfield
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/149 - Release Date: 10/25/2005
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast
Database: 266.9.16 - Release Date: 4/18/2005
Regards,
Chuck Mayfield
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.16 - Release Date: 4/18/2005
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Groups
.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.8 - Release Date: 4/13/2005
Regards,
Chuck Mayfield
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.8 - Release Date: 4/13/2005
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING
CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.7 - Release Date: 4/12/2005
Regards,
Chuck Mayfield
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti
At 12:25 PM 2/21/2005, you wrote:
anyone have a link for download of the Knoppix live cd with the ham
programs built in that is in English ?
have the German version, but no fun to play with.
david/wd4kpd
Try starting it with knoppix lang=en
Regards,
Chuck - AA5J
--
No virus found in
86 matches
Mail list logo
