Hi Andy,
That's just nonsense.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 09:03 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
Yes, I received a private email from the individual that is preparing
the IED's. With reference to ALE soundings, he cites ..
) 1 illegal 1-way transmissions;
2) illegal automatic beaconing below 28.200
Rick,
You obviously don't understand NVIS, the bulk of all my ALE activity
is NVIS based, this is true of Amateur Radio as well, which is 30m
and lower ( 5Mhz thru 11Mhz is excellent during the day, that is our
premiere MARS range, 5-7Mhz can be counted on 24/7 by the way, its
too bad that
Hi Andy,
All true, I could not agree more!
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 10:20 AM 1/12/2008, you wrote:
I'll say again... the only thing wrong with the concept of ALE is the
lack of active users. Everything else about ALE makes perfect sense
to me. Here are the basics.
Hi Alan,
I agree to a point, it depends on ones focus, if you recall I have
always run my GAP DX Voyager antenna when looking for world wide
activity such as in HFlink events, that antenna at 100 watts and an
ATU works all Amateur bands 100%. However using a Skywave antenna
heavily takes
John,
Your message below is easy to summarize succinctly, thanks.
At 09:48 PM 1/10/2008, you wrote:
Chris , ZL1BOE
you will be told by others that ALE is widely
used to set up QSOs and QSYs using the one
line message ability . You will also be told
that it is used widely for keyboard to
John,
Sorry but I know the relative level of activity
at times. There is far less ALE than various
other modes and more ALE than various other modes
as well. It all depends on your point of
reference, just as there is Hellscriber than GTOR
and more CW than PSK31, regardless your statement
Hi Rick,
From reading your comments I see you still fail to fully understand
the potential value of ALE to Amateur Radio, especially to ECOM.
ALE is the great facilitator to follow on communications, nothing
aside from MIL-STD AQC-ALE and the host of copy cat systems such by
the likes of
Rick,
RM-11392 is a most excellent example of a bad petition in my opinion.
As Andrew stated, The proposal has no chance of being adopted.
Also, I don't see any relevance to your CW vs. SSB comments and
RM-11392. I don't know where the heck you operate CW, even with my
oldest hybrid
Hi Rick,
You really need to view RM-11392 for what it is, the entire thrust of
RM-11392 in my opinion is an effort at protectionism ( its an old
story that dates back ages ) of obsolete technology and practices by
an attempt to limit the advancement of new technologies and
practices, this is
Hi Bruce,
From your reply I can see that my statement really it home, sorry if
the the hurts!
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 07:07 PM 12/26/2007, you wrote:
You really need to view RM-11392 for what it is, the
entire thrust of RM-11392 in my opinion is an effort
at protectionism ( its an old story that
Hi Rick,
At 08:26 PM 12/26/2007, you wrote:
Hi Steve,
I agree that it is a type of protectionism.
Which in my opinion is a worst case issue for the Amateur Radio
Service (ARS) than the technical challenges being presented.
I did not view it that way
as much until we really started seeing
Hi Peter,
I have been very busy lately and just now reading
the items on FDMDV, however its the Mixed
Excitation Linear Prediction (MELP) for digital
speech that was developed as U.S. and STANAG
standards over the last 10 years or so then I don't see any issues.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 10:34
Hi John,
If you are using PC-ALE 1.062H ( the latest build being #5) I can not
imagine why you are having any issues with your TS-480SAT if the CAT
control of radio works otherwise with any other software.
All you need to do is select either KENWOOD or if using CTS/RTS
handshaking,
Hi Kevin,
I squeezed out support for com ports 1 through 16, older version were
com 1 through 9. The limitation is imposed by the Microsoft
supplied comm driver for the C++ compiler.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 06:25 PM 12/11/2007, you wrote:
pcale 1.062H will only allow CAT control via COM1 and
Hi Brian,
At 08:29 AM 11/2/2007, you wrote:
I'm not trying to be a pain in the butt, honest.
Neither is my reply meant to be anything other than pointing out the obvious.
We need narrower bandwidths not wider bandwidths for real progress
with the real life crowded bands. I think that is
Hi Rick,
You obviously do not use MT-63 to pass book traffic on a daily basis
on NVIS paths, fore if you did your opinion would be completely
different and if you don't believe me, just ask any MARS member that
is using a Sound Card based system these days and they will tell you
just how
Hi Tony,
Too bad you did not also run MT-63 at all three
modes for comparison. I can tell you that next to
the various 75bps Robust mode on the
MIL-STD-188-110/STANAG modem, its very robust.
However under such conditions nothing but an ARQ protocol will really suffice.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At
Rick,
I don't share your dream Rick, sorry that you did not like that
description, but I was trying to be polite about it. I am not here to
stop you or anyone from pursuing your dreams, go learn C++ or Ada and
start coding it up into your dream communications software. However I
am a realist
, no surprises there.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 12:22 AM 10/18/2007, you wrote:
AA6YQ comments below
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Hajducek
snip
2. With respect to Remote User to Automatic Station communications,
the human operator initiates
Rick,
At 03:21 PM 10/18/2007, you wrote:
Steve,
This is not a dream of mine. This is what eventually will have to be if
automatic operation is to continue to be permitted on amateur
frequencies.
Its just a dream on your part and other until such time rules ever
require it Rick.
This
Dave,
As simple as I can put it for you, it is my opinion that the better
solution is separation into sub bands is the only logical solution to
your perceived issues with automated stations triggered by remote
users as technology as we know it now (and likely for a very long
time to come)
Hi Dave,
Basically your intent is to de-couple that antenna from the feed line
for consistent performance, as such for a resonant dipole feed you
can use a 1:1 balun, you internal antenna tuner will work much better.
A 4:1 balun for a resonant dipole will yield a higher VSWR at the
point of
, will they ever get a chance to send that health
and welfare traffic in a timely manor or at all? Hopefully some of
this has assisted you in seeing more of the complexity and down sides
of this busy frequency detection dream Rick.
Sincerely,
/s/ Steve Hajducek, N2CKH
At 09:56 AM 10/17/2007, you
Hi Kevin,
If you select by model number from Radio Type you want your radio
to be using the factory address and 19200 baud.
If you use GENERIC ICOM, which I don't recommend, then you want to
use the baud radio your is set to 8N1, the radio address your radio
is set. Don't both checking SPLIT
Hi Peter,
You need to join the HFlink forum or the FlexRadio forum as not
having a system here I can only tell you that what I coded into
PC-ALE works when all else involved in the radio configuration is
solid and that's about it on my end, I just don't have any feel for
it beyond the PC-ALE
Hi Kevin,
You are using OLD software, you want the latest PC-ALE v1.062H
Interim Build #5 which is found at the HFlink Yahoo forum.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 11:02 AM 10/14/2007, you wrote:
Steve Hajducek wrote:
Hi Kevin,
If you select by model number from Radio Type you want your radio
Hi Guys,
You need to either use an ASCII editor like NOTEPAD and use find and
replace on NOCALL to change to your callsign and reload the .QRG file
OR
Select an unused SCAN GROUP where no OWN is being used and starting
at the top menu selection Address Modify Own and select NOCALL
from
Hi Peter,
A number of fellows tested the new radio control
in PC-ALE v1.062H in the latest builds ( #5 being
the most recent) with the SDR-1000 and all works
just fine I am told, although I wrote it, I don't
have one here to test with. If you are using DIG
instead of USB, you need to
Hi David,
I know of no *nux based native application that has been offered to
the world yet as ready for use. There is a package for developers
that Charles Brain and another fellow placed on SourceForge under GNU
called LinuxALE that dates back over 5 years now, which I have not
seen anyone
Hi John,
For ARRL members, that piece was on page 9 of the Oct 2007 QST.
More and more ALE will become integrated into the Amateur Radio
Service (ARS) do to its significant advantages, it is just such an
obvious path to take with respect to the role that the ARS plays in
ECOM support for one
Hi Jim,
It sounds almost like you are making case to abolish all forms of
Amateur Radio Contesting with this argument of yours, no where in the
FCC rules are contesting ( which by the way I enjoy ) mentioned as
such, actually many of the FCC rules could be used to make an
argument against
Hi Andy,
The FCC rules don't actually require changing WRT ALE other than to
satisfy those that want to see things spelled out in black and white
specifically approving or disapproving each and everyone little
thing. This is not the intent of the FCC to constantly be updating
the rules to
Hi Rick,
That reference is to Government/Military HF e-mail topology which has
evolved to the STANAG 5066 standard pretty much across the board,
however not everyone is there yet due to costs and time to update
their network infrastructures. STANAG 5066 can basically be thought
of as what
Hi Rud,
In my opinion there is already a better ALE, it is Alternate Quick
Call (AQC) ALE which improves upon ALE in a number of ways as
detailed in MILl-STD-188-141B where a number new features have been
added ( such as shorter linking cycles, 6 character maximum SELCALs,
PSK burst mode
Hi John,
I sent you a direct e-mail with screen caps that should get you going.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 04:32 PM 9/24/2007, you wrote:
well I d'loaded the not quite latest version as Steve suggested, and , as
before, I can copy stations but cannot transmit anything, except using VOX.
The comms
Hi Joe,
You must be using PC-ALE v1.062H ( build #2 should be used) for the
support of the IC746PRO data port, when you use ADD or MODIFY
channels you need to select USB-D and not USB.
When using the Radio Type selection of 746PRO you need to use the
factory address and 19,200 baud, if you
Hi John,
Using PC-ALE v1.062H Interim build 2 from the HFlink forum files
section ( forget build 3, it has an issue), just select radio type
KENWOOD or if you want to use RTS/CTS handshaking, KENWOOD_HS and if
your radio supports more than 4800 baud, click on Radio Port and
provide the Baud
Hi Rud,
Sorry that I could not be of help in getting you squared away with
your understanding of ALE.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 07:14 PM 9/23/2007, you wrote:
See my main comment inline below...
This is likely my last response to these messages. I have better things to
do than argue with a group
Hi Rick,
Patricks FAE ARQ is an excellent protocol, it is the best example to
date in my opinion of a PCSMD based ARQ protocol developed for Amateur Radio.
The ALE 8FSK is not being replace by serial tone modem use for its
Sounding/LQA/Calling/Linking, believe me that is not going to happen.
Hi Andy,
Frequencies are are required on all the Amateur Radio band assets to
deal with the changes in propagation 24/7. As a matter of fact, the
Amateur Radio Service does not have enough allocations to actually
deal with 24/7 propagation changes, a key reason for the WARC bands
in '79 and
Hi Rud,
Yes, the Military and Government HF users can and do at times operate
with more RF EIRP that we Radio Amateurs have licensed limits for operating.
However, WRT ALE at least, its not needed and the bulk of HF Military
activity is usually within NVIS ranges as its tactical, and with
Hi Jim,
You really must be making a tongue in check joking reply here, that
is the only way that I can take such a reply as the Amateur Radio
bands have been broken down into specific use for decades and ever
changing. I can NOT go down to 14.004Mhz and make a SSB contact as it
is dedicated
Hi Jim,
You really must be making a tongue in check joking reply here, that
is the only way that I can take such a reply as the Amateur Radio
bands have been broken down into specific use for decades and ever
changing. I can NOT go down to 14.004Mhz and make a SSB contact as it
is dedicated
Hi Jim,
A good analogy of sharing spectrum between peer-to-peer and
remote-to-automated is like a car or any size sharing a single road
lane with a tractor trailer, where both are competing to have the
lane, the outcome is clear in the long run, however what would be
better, especially for
Hello Rud,
How often does a remote users sending traffic through an automated
station have to wait due to an exasberated number of ARQ retries due
to stations purposely transmitting CQ's or whatever just because they
don't care that its not a two-way QSO that is inhabiting the channel.
It's
Hi Andy,
Yes you are missing the key item with this support, its called Voice
Detect, not Busy Detect! As such its looking for channel acty that
is Voice or Voice like ( which is what I hate about this item) to
hold off transmitting.
In Amateur Radio as in most applications of ALE, you have
Hi Rick,
Take any non-GUI or even a GUI OS that has been tailored down for the
embedded application at hand that is running sufficient CPU/RAM and
you could implement a PI through PIII solution if SCS would allow it.
PII and PIII if fully documented could be done using a PC Sound
Device Modem
Hi Jon, Simon:
Well MS-Windows being an event driven, multi-tasking environment is
the not the best environment when it comes to dealing with signaling
and data comm ports, however it can be managed for PTT needs
reasonable well depending on how strict such PTT timing requirements
are. For
Hi Rick,
At 09:59 AM 8/6/2007, you wrote:
In terms of CAT PTT, aren't you using some of the same interfacing with
RS-232 serial connection for rig control? It seems a step backwards to
set up two RS-232 serial ports considering that we also need to convert
from USB. I admit that the ICOM CI-V
Hi Andy,
In the U.S. ( correct me if I am wrong) which you are located, 300bps
for MIL-STD-188-110 is not legal for data on HF, nothing is due to
the symbol rate.
Anyhow, what ever, who ever, where ever does using MIL-STD-188-110
within the ARS, the standard 1800hz PSK carrier and 2400bps
Hi Rick,
At 02:38 PM 8/5/2007, you wrote:
Steve and those interested in the ICOM rigs for ALE:
I had asked Steve:
I am using the default hex address 64 with CAT PTT selected.
And he responded with information on the new Alpha version:
For the new ALPHA version of PC-ALE you still need to
GM Andy,
In PC-ALE the AQC-ALE operation differs from MARS-ALE for some time
now, however with both tools selecting AQC-ALE means that all
Soundings and Calls originated by your station will be in AQC-ALE
mode, which differs from NORMAL ALE and which can only be decoded by
an ALE modem that
Hello Ali,
The current version of PC-ALE is really RTS/DTR PTT based, the reason
being that it has long proven to be much more reliable whereas CAT
PTT has not, RF into the radio can lock a rig into TX using CAT PTT
and other issues come into play, if you notice most rigs do not
support CAT
Hi Rick,
I have replied to your comments many times on these matters:
1. PC-ALE as released does not specifically support the PRO2, the
next release will. For now if you are not interested in ALPHA testing
the next release, its the use of the GENERIC ICOM interface and
DTR/RTS for PTT. It
Hi Andy,
It is the same 8FSK modem, however it uses shorter bursts for calling
and sounding and there is a PSK burst mode as well which uses the
MIL-STD-188-110 modem for generation.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 09:26 AM 8/4/2007, you wrote:
Thanks Steve. Is the AQC-ALE a different digital mode,
GM Rick,
Alternate Link Call (AQC) ALE is basically 2G Plus ALE in that its an
advanced 8FSK form of ALE where most all of the un-necessary overhead
of ALE has been removed and new capabilities have been added, to
include a PSK burst mode. The linking time to setup is must faster
with
Hi Rick,
Plus it retains the bi-directional (duplex) support ( and most
things) of DBM ARQ and thus both stations can type at the same time
and as soon as it sync's the resends will only be predicated on propo.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 10:05 AM 2/27/2007, you wrote:
Had a late night connection
Hi Rick,
RTTY is dead in MARS in my opinion as to being useful, but still
allowed in all three MARS programs as far as I know, CW was
vanquished some years ago now, prior to my return to MARS. There are
3 MARS as you know and to date, there are different approaches in all
three and many
Hi Guys,
For optimal ALE reception you want your RX passband set to 1625hz
when using less than 2.8 or 3.0Khz IF filtering, anyone running a ham
rig with the typical 2.1 to 2.7 filtering will need to enable IF
shift and move it up in frequency else you are starving the modem
from seeing all
Hello All,
Patrick is to be commended on his efforts to date with regard to
adding ALE capabilities to MultiPSK in support of Amateur Radio
application single channel.
I have been using his new a bit for the past two days and I find his
new ARQ FAE protocol which is based on the DTM ARQ
Hi Jonathan,
Can you accept a 26MB email?
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 12:56 AM 2/13/2007, you wrote:
Howdy folks,
I need this manual if you have it on PDF. No longer on their site.
Thanks,
Jonathan KC7FYS
Hi Paul,
Considering that neither the ARRL or the FCC did the right thing,
which would have been to make the Technician Class license the entry
class license that it really could have been by maintaining the
Novice Subbands and keeping the Novice RF input power for all classes
of licensees
GM Andy,
There are some issues with DBM ARQ in PC-ALE which will be going
away, thus the use of RESET MODEM may often be required at times
during poor conditions.
Also remember to NEVER, NEVER use any of the TRACING functions when
you want to use the tool in two-way communications and you
Hi Andy,
A system that implemented the ALE Data Block Message (DBM) ARQ
protocol using the PC Sound Device Modem (PCSDM) which at a raw 125
baud with its deep interleaving providing a full 3x throughput on a
good circuit where no ACK/NAK failures occurred would be much better.
GTOR which
Hi Rick,
The U.S. Declaration of Independence of late has become a popular
MARS EXERCISE test message in testing MARS-ALE and with ALE DBM ARQ,
that as the body of the message along with the standard MARS message
header and tail takes just over 6 minutes if there are no ACK/NAK
failures
At 05:14 PM 9/21/2006, you wrote:
Prior to the wide deployment of MIL-STD-188-110 equipment, most U.S.
military HF data communications used RTTY/ASCII modes through
encryption devices. These were large and not really field portable.
Hi Walt,
The MIL-STD-188-110 parrale16 tone modem with or
that we would have a sea
change in sound card modes.
Just to clarify, does the 8PSK have each of the 8 running at 125 baud,
or is that the total baud speed and the tones are really 15.625 x 8
which would give you the 125 baud speed?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Steve Hajducek wrote:
GA
Hi Mark,
The Mil-Std-188-110B serial (single-tone) mode use M-ary Phase-Shift
Keying (PSK) on a single carrier frequency (1800hz standard) as the
modulation technique for data transmission. The serial binary
information is converted into a single 8-ary PSK-modulated output
carrier where
Hi Mark,
I just seen this after sending you a reply...
You go the idea, you actually put it forth simpler than I did as gave
you too much detail, but yet just touched the tip of it ! I may have
to save your explanation below for a more simple reply in the future,
but I can never seem find
developed as a bus card and
the computer mostly being used as a dumb terminal, but it will never be
as tight a frequency tolerance as 10 e -6 or so:)
73,
Rick, KV9U
Steve Hajducek wrote:
Hi Rick,
ALE itself is 8FSK, 125 baud, all protocols on that modem.
After an ALE link, any protocol
Hi Dave,
I really could not say for sure based on your criteria, depending on
what you mean as asked.
However using ALE and an appropriate Global Allcall or Anycall is
very powerful. If the propo is there for the given frequency at the
given time of the call, if there were 1,000 stations
Hi Dave,
Regarding the Sounding aspect of life, not all stations need to be
Sounding and not all stations need to be Sounding once per hour.
Sounding can be adjusted to accommodate the loading of a network. The
more stations that are ALE active on the same channel less frequent
you sound and
Hi Dave,
Speaking of Ada, I developed the MS-Windows AMDS (
https://peoiewswebinfo.monmouth.army.mil/portal_sites/IEWS_Public/rus//AMDS.htm
) for the I-REMBASS Battlefield Sensor System in Ada for the U.S.
Army due to requirements (Ada is a very good large embedded systems
language, it is
Hi Dave,
That aspect of PC-ALE in being updated. For a number of years the
core users of PC-ALE mostly used a common set of HF SSB transceivers
that were well to ALE Scanning use where the PA BPF relays were not
an issue or could be bypassed via command and external PTT was mostly
used and a
Hi Rick,
At 01:53 PM 8/31/2006, you wrote:
The PC-ALE program gave my some difficult times at first with crashing.
I think I figured that out. At this time I don't see to be able to get
the program to interface with my ICOM 756 Pro 2 rig through the CI-V.
For that model with the current PC-ALE
speed?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Steve Hajducek wrote:
GA Rick, Patrick:
The stuff from MIL-STD-188-141B that relates the MIL-STD-118-110x
modem and Data Link Protocols (DLP) via other standards (e.g.
FS-1052 DLP, S5066 DLP etc.) is all high speed serial tone and as
specified, not legal under FCC
Hi Walt,
PC-ALE and MARS-ALE are long ago there and its operational in the
MARS program daily in messaging.
Many MARS members with enough CPU/RAM are running MARS-ALE under
Windows emulation such as WHINE or CrossOver, however my Linux boxes
are rather old PC's ( 4 Red Hat box's - 2x 6.2 for
Hi Dave,
I put in a number of years of DoD IVV and I agree 100% that Ada was
a huge benefit over all the languages, many of them unique to a
particular CPU or embedded platform. I can't begin to tell you how
many languages that I was forced to use in DoD related projects
before Ada came
difficult would this be to implement the MIL-STD-188-141-B DLP in
software such as Patrick's Multipsk Program?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Steve Hajducek wrote:
Hi Rick,
Just time for a quick comment.
Don't confuse STANAG 5066 Data Link Protocol (DLP) as covered
in
software such as Patrick's Multipsk Program?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Steve Hajducek wrote:
Hi Rick,
Just time for a quick comment.
Don't confuse STANAG 5066 Data Link Protocol (DLP) as covered in
MIL-STD-188-141B which is a Data Link Protocol at the Physical Layer
with STANAG
GM Dave,
Yes, a technical item up for discussion.
I must assume that you have never done any Near Real Time Systems
development such as ATE or Industrial Control applications under MS-Windows?
I on the other hand have and the WIN32 API beginning all the way back
with Windows NT implemented a
Hi Dave,
At 10:53 PM 8/27/2006, you wrote:
Does ALE provide some means of reducing contention?
I recommend that to answer all of your technical questions on subject
ALE that you refer the actual Federal, Military and STANAG Standards
which you can find on the Internet quite easily. You can
Hi Dave,
At 10:46 AM 8/28/2006, you wrote:
I have reviewed enough of the military documentation to understand
that they employ dedicated ALE transceivers capable of much faster
scanning rates.
Really? Please enlighten me, I was under the impression that the ALE
scan rates of 1, 2 and 5
Hi Dave,
I mentioned AMTOR as its timing is more robust that PACTOR I.
As I have stated to the MARS-ALE users, the future version of that
tool when PACTOR I support is added ont he PCSDM will pretty much own
the OS, not a problem for our purposes as that one program running is
our only
to look like another one of those the emperor has no clothes
findings.
Thanks and 73,
Rick, KV9U
Steve Hajducek wrote:
I recommend that to answer all of your technical questions on subject
ALE that you refer the actual Federal, Military and STANAG Standards
which you can find
At 11:41 AM 8/28/2006, you wrote:
I'm willing to believe that the timing tolerances in -tor modes
are so tight that ordinary PC operating systems cannot cope with
them the way a dedicated processor can. What I don't understand
is why the tolerances need to be so tight. The transmitter sends
a
Hi Chris,
Take a look at DBM ARQ in
http://www.n2ckh.com/MARS_ALE_FORUM/MIL-STD-188-141B.pdf starting on
page 178, it really lends itself to the PCSDM and its works
fantastic, I love GTOR, more so than PACTOR I since the day I bought
my first KAM Plus (I like my KAM XL a bit better though)
Hi Bill,
I just want to make one observation regarding the
Amateur Radio Service (ARS) from a strictly U.S.
Amateur perspective as you to are U.S. based.
That observation is with respect to FCC Part 97.1
below, in the order of priority listed, I pretty
much think it sums it all up pretty
, the following U.S. Military
Joint Services document is a good read on all this:
http://www.navymars.org/national/ale/FM%206-02.74_1.PDF
/s/ Steve, N2CKH/AAR2EY
73,
Rick, KV9U
Steve Hajducek wrote:
Hi Rick,
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas
Hi Rick,
I wanted to make this a separate message for some reading regarding
ALE and Katrina, I do not know all the details of ALE use by all the
agencies involved, many just take it for granted actually, below is
an item to read related to the subject of ALE and Katrina that I have
made
claim that one activity is more important
than another solely because its applicable principle has a lower
ordinal.
This is not a matter of interpretation. Regulations are explicit when
they convey an order of priority.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hajducek
Hi Mark,
Welcome to the world of ALE acty.
DBM is the killer 8FSK protocol from the standard. Its raw speed is
125 baud but deeply interleaved which has it neck and neck with its
kissing cousin GTOR for throughput. The BRD (FEC) selection is very
robust and the ARQ is just great. It supports
Hi Rick,
I just had to take a break from the .NET C++ compiler to reply to
this one, day job work and other demands have slow my responses the
past few days, although I will try to reply some of the other
messages flying about if I can make the time
At 12:40 PM 8/26/2006, you
At 11:26 AM 8/26/2006, you wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hajducek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The ALE antenna issue is a major one for either portable or fixed
though.
How's that?
I have a NVIS antenna that above that range starts to look like a
random wire with gain
Hello All,
Argue it as you may, the Internet is unreliable on many levels to due
normal loading at those levels and vulnerable to targeted attacks, it
is well documented, for the latest visit: http://www.cert.org/ It is
targeted daily and will be the target in any major conflicts, its
just
Hi Dave,
At 01:59 PM 8/23/2006, you wrote:
Re: The technical world, and especially amateur radio should rise
above that in concerted efforts to accomplish desired common goals.
Amend to that !
A prerequisite for concerted action is to clearly state the goal, and
to have that goal make sense.
Hi Dave,
You go it.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 01:17 PM 8/23/2006, you wrote:
Oh, I see, Steve. You believe that the internet is insufficiently
reliable
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector :
in use.
Otherwise, its entirely incompatible with amateur radio.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hajducek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Dave,
As fine a product as DXLab, HRD or anything else may be for casual
Amateur Radio CAT Rig control, nothing
that the PC-ALE application crashes seems like reasonable
feedback. Labeling this feedback as a complaint is not the way to
encourage more feedback and the improvements it can drive.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hajducek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
and welcomed assistance?
Putting a logic analyzer on his PC's microprocessor and sending you a
an execution trace?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hajducek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Dave,
I did not get from Rick at that point that he was looking for any
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
