The flaw in your rhetoric, Jaak, is that Winlink PMBOs are QRMing existing
QSOs whether or not an emergency is in progress. No one has a problem with
this during an emergency -- but most of the time (thank goodness!) there is
no emergency, and we're being QRM'd for no rational reason. There is
Technically not a big deal indeed. But we are still talking about a few months
of
spare time :) I will think about it. It might even bring some new life to the
packet
network. Where I live it is a dying sport. Traffic on our local node (PI1EHV)
has gone
down to some 10% of what it was...
I will think about it.
It would be nice to have the pskmail functionality in a re-usable form.
The actual code is not easy to run in windows, i did try and failed.
The actual file-io message transfer system has the advantage to be
universally usable. It's not linked to a specific psk31
The only time you would need specific tones as Demetre mentions below,
is if you have filters that are preset for those tones. This is the way
it used to be in the past with one filter tuned for the mark frequency
and the other for the shift frequency offset. Mostly that was
standardized with
Hi Nick and all,
Happy New Year. I am calling CQ on PACTOR right now and I will
continue until 16.00 UTC.
Anyone from USA interested please reply on PACTOR 1 or 2.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
It would be nice to have the pskmail functionality in a re-usable
form.
The code is complicated enough to need deep involvement to understand.
It's not possible to quick-hack it into C. We need the help of the
author !
There is a C implementation of flARQ. It uses gtk UI toolkit and
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nick and all,
Happy New Year. I am calling CQ on PACTOR right now and I will
continue until 16.00 UTC.
Anyone from USA interested please reply on PACTOR 1 or 2.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Hi Demetre,
Happy New
Hi Demetre,
Listening but nothing heard yet. Numerous signals abound
the frequency but will be monitoring.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
- Original Message -
From: Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:09 AM
Subject:
As we enter our 9th year, I want to thank all of you for for
establishing this group as the world's leading discussion group for
amateur radio digital modes. Here are is the annual re-posting of the
rules...
Digitalradio Message Posting Rules:
Messages that promote commercial products are NOT
Calling CQ PACTOR on 7.038 KHZ (center frequency).
Just finished a 20 minutes QSO in PACTOR II with OZ1PMX. Despite the
QRM and zero signals the link kept going right through the end.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Hi Ned/EI5DS,
Thanks for the PACTOR QSOs today. Even with S0 signals we managed the
QSO thanks to PACTOR! Hope to see you tomorrow sometime. I will post
to Andy's SKED PAGE and here first and hopefully we can have some more
QSOs on 20m.
HAPPY NEW YEAR to you and all.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today the filter is often in the software program you are running on
your computer and it no longer matters what the tones are. You move the
cursor along the waterfall to place your signal or to decode the signal
and the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
And don't forget that really it does not matter if you use USB or LSB
and you can always flick the REVERSE SWITCH. This is true for all
narrow digital modes with the exception of QPSK31.
[snip]
73 de Demetre
And MFSK, Olivia, and Domino EX. They are (or can be) =500Hz.
Leigh/WA5ZNU
and you can always flick the REVERSE SWITCH. This is true for all
narrow digital modes with the exception of QPSK31.
[snip]
73 de Demetre SV1UY
I forgot to mention that the REVERSE SWITCH is only present in
I wonder if anyone here knows who runs this group?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hf_packet_radio/
Seems like its a morgue :-) I applied 10 days ago.nothing.
While I am at ithow many active on HF Packet here?
Have a great New Year!
73s
Jack VK4JRC
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And MFSK, Olivia, and Domino EX. They are (or can be) =500Hz.
Leigh/WA5ZNU
Thanks for letting us know Leigh. Never worked these modes OM.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
That group has had just three posts in 2007 and none since July, I
think it is pushing up daisies.
Andy
On Jan 1, 2008 4:39 PM, vk4jrc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if anyone here knows who runs this group?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hf_packet_radio/
Seems like its a morgue
Hi Jack,
I too am waiting on membership .
Meanwhile running PSK31 and MT63 and Vhf Packet
73 Ken
PacketRadio is Still
Alive...Mississippi...145.010...Simplex...1200 Baud
- Original Message
From: vk4jrc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
I have downloaded pskmail_pup_w-0.5.5.zip
It has installed ok and runs ok on Win.
It has FLDIGI and FLARQ pre-installed. FLDIGI runs ok, but I cannot at
this stage get PTT working I aparently cannot nominate the correct com port.
The com port, in Windows, is com 3 (a PCI Com Card).
I will
Dave! You wrote, that there is nothing wrong with transmitting robots in
ham-bands - only verification of frequency.
IMO there are minimum 2 more general questions.
1. Ethics. Robot ethics. So the primary question is not verificational.
Does the transmitting robot must respect/tolerate
LAWS OF RADIO ROBOTICS
A robot operator may not QRM a human operator or, through
inaction, allow a human operator to be QRMed.
A robot operator must obey orders given it
Since we're excluding emergency conditions, it would be hard to argue that
any of Asimov's laws are applicable unless you have a very broad definition
of come to harm. QRM from a PMBO unquestionably diminishes the enjoyment
of those operators who've been QRMed, but have they truly come to harm?
Howard Brown wrote:
LAWS OF RADIO ROBOTICS
A robot operator may not QRM a human operator or, through inaction,
allow a human operator to be QRMed.
A robot operator must obey orders given it by human operators
especially orders to stop transmitting until the frequency is clear.
A
At 01:20 PM 12/31/2007, you wrote:
I might be wrong but I think that MixW can parse Pactor1 FEC.
de Roger W6VZV
Why even try?
You have stated a number of times pactor is dead !
The NBEMS development team is pleased to announce the availability of a
Windows NBEMS software suite for beta testing.
The NarrowBand Emergency Messaging System (NBEMS) for Windows is a suite of
software programs designed for point-to-point, fast, error-free, emergency
messaging up to or over
Of the 15 or so logs received so far, the comments appear to be.
The bands (40 and 20M) were in very poor conditions
Both Olivia and JT65A contests were considered tough. Activity was
, according to early reports, higher in the JT65A mode .
Several JT65A WSJT users had difficulty handing a
-- Forwarded message from K3UK's HF-APRS Reflector --
From: g0jxn.jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 10, 2007 1:24 AM
Subject: [HF-APRS] HF APRS
Cc: HF-APRS Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Guys
Now QRV 10.147.600/USB (10.147 for AGW) 29.250/FM (1200bd).
73
Jim, G0JXN
from K3UK's HF-APRS YahooGroup.
-- Forwarded message --
From: oe3mzc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 18, 2007 4:22 AM
Subject: [HF-APRS] Frequency accurracy tolerance tnc? main problem for
HF-APRS shortwave ?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
many tncs for 300baud FSk packet radio used
On Jan 1, 2008 9:23 PM, kh6ty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NBEMS development team is pleased to announce the availability of a
Windows NBEMS software suite for beta testing.
The NarrowBand Emergency Messaging System (NBEMS) for Windows is a suite of
software programs designed for
7072 (VFO) PSK63 FLARQ beacon every 60 seconds with VBdigi NBECS
ANdy K3UK
Nice work, Skip! Congrats!!!
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of kh6ty
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 9:24 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] NBEMS available for beta testing
Dave/Skip
When I attempt to minimize the help files, I get a run time error (350)
--
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)
At 08:34 PM 1/1/2008, you wrote:
John, you might ask yourself if your above comment is worthy of your
personal level of maturity.
Roger please, I'm not the one that can't fine a pactor QSO.
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
At 08:34 PM 1/1/2008, you wrote:
John, you might ask yourself if your above comment is worthy of
your personal level of maturity.
Roger please, I'm not the one that can't fine a pactor QSO.
Yes, John, a terrible moral failing, I know... 8-)
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
On Jan 1, 2008 9:23 PM, kh6ty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NBEMS development team is pleased to announce the availability of a
Windows NBEMS software suite for beta testing.
I have downloaded NBEMSsetup and unzipped to a temp folder
Any attempt
At 12:20 PM 1/2/2008, you wrote:
AX.25 Packet is (IMHO) useless as an HF mode..
ICK!!
--
Patricia (Elaine) Gibbons
WA6UBE / AAR9JA
http://www.qrz.com/wa6ubehttp://www.qrz.com/wa6ube
Mmmm, its a good mode :-) HF Packet is my only link to a BBS, over
1300 kilometres away, I can log on fine,
from K3UK's HF-APRS YahooGroup.
-- Forwarded message --
From: oe3mzc mailto:oe3mzc%40oevsv.at[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 18, 2007 4:22 AM
Subject: [HF-APRS] Frequency accurracy tolerance tnc? main problem for
HF-APRS shortwave ?
To: mailto:HF-APRS%40yahoogroups.com[EMAIL
37 matches
Mail list logo
