Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.21.0-rc1

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers did not compile from source On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I

Re: [VOTE] Have Amoro join the Incubator

+1 binding On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 3:56 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 2024/03/03 07:08:53 Imba Jin wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Good luck~ > > > > On 2024/03/03 01:44:24 Justin Mclean wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Following on from the discussion of the Amoro proposal [1][2],

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gluten Into the ASF Incubator

+1 binding On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 10:26 PM vin jake wrote: > +1(non-binding). > > Good luck. > > Best, > kabikabi. > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 10:48 AM ShaoFeng Shi > wrote: > > > Hi Incubator, > > > > Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal[1], > > I am starting this official vote

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

Very interesting. Let me know if I can help as mentor On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 7:30 AM tison wrote: > Thanks for driving this proposal Shaofeng :D > > +1 to support this project entering the Incuabtor. It's in good shape > to develop an OSS project with a diverse group. Hopefully, the >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.19.0-rc3

.1.cjs. It is a generated binary file > and includes multiple third-party codes, each under its respective license. > [image: image.png] > > Felix Cheung 于2023年12月11日周一 05:46写道： > >> Is it possible to list files? >> > point to the relative file path >> >> >> On Fr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.19.0-rc3

e/incubator-devlake/pull/6483 or > https://github.com/apache/incubator-devlake/blob/v0.19.0-rc3/LICENSE > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-devlake/blob/v0.19.0-rc3/LICENSE)> > It's just that it's aggregated instead of listing each one individually. > > Best, > Zikuan An >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fury Into the ASF Incubator

+1 binding On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 11:05 PM Ayush Saxena wrote: > +1(Binding) > > -Ayush > > > On 10-Dec-2023, at 12:10 PM, zhongyi tan wrote: > > > > +1 （binding） > > > >> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 7:05 PM tison wrote: > >> > >> Hi Incubator > >> > >> Following the discussion [DISCUSS]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Uniffle (Incubating) V0.8.0 RC3

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 6:36 AM Xianjing Feng wrote: > Hello Incubator Community, > > This is a call for a vote to release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.19.0-rc3

I see the main comments from rc2 have been addressed. To add though, if possible please add text in LICENSE to point to the relative file path to files under these licenses (remaining comment from the last vote) - You still need to, as required by the license, include the full text of the MIT

Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

Interesting. Let me know if I can be of help as mentor On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 1:35 PM Austin Bennett wrote: > Awesome -- OneTable has a great purpose/mission, and can be really > useful! I look forward to helping where I am able. > > > On 2023/12/04 21:23:17 Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.19.0-rc2

+1 binding - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers what is this file config-ui/.yarn/releases/yarn-3.4.1.cjs - seems to have code in it (and it does not have a license

Re: [VOTE] Accept Answer into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:24 AM Craig Russell wrote: > +1 binding. > > Good luck! > Craig > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 17:17, Willem Jiang wrote: > > > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Answer [1] I would like to call a > > VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator. > > > > Answer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave (incubating) v0.5.1-rc.2

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash are fine it looks like there is a conflict between KEYS (file) and keys (directory): $ tar xzf apache-teaclave-0.5.1-rc.2-incubating.tar.gz apache-teaclave-0.5.1-rc.2-incubating/KEYS: Can't replace existing directory with non-directory tar: Error exit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Uniffle(Incubating) 0.7.0

+1 binding - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:24 PM Liu Xun wrote: > +1 (binding) from me, > > I have checked the following items: > -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.15.0-rc4

As I understand you can release under the WIP disclaimer On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:31 AM Zikuan An wrote: > Thanks for your valuable suggestion. > > I will revisit the whole process and re-open the vote after fixing the > issues you mentioned. > > > Best, > > Zikuan An > > Justin Mclean

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.15.0-rc2

- incubating in name - signature and hash fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER 1) is tap-pagerduty required to operate/run? it is in requirements.txt and it has a GPL-v3 license

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.3.1-incubating-rc1

+1 binding On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 1:00 AM Jia Yu wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona 1.3.1-incubating-rc1. Due to two > critical bugs [1] and [2] , the users who use 1.3.0 have trouble running > Sedona on Java 8 or Scala 2.12. We have to make this new release in a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Uniffle (Incubating) 0.6.1-rc3

What is the plan? Seem strange to require a patched Apache project to work. On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:22 PM Kaijie Chen wrote: > > What are the reason for these? btw, if this is from the Apache Spark > > project you might need to attribute it in LICENSE. > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Uniffle (Incubating) 0.6.1-rc3

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers What are the reason for these? btw, if this is from the Apache Spark project you might need to attribute it in LICENSE.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Sedona as an Apache Top Level Project

the office of "Vice President, Apache Sedona" be and > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Sedona > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the > projects withi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.3.0-incubating-rc2

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - compile from source On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 8:36 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for vote on Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:26 AM Ashish wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:49 PM Yu Li wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would like to > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.14.0-rc1

t; votes, no +0 or -1 votes. > > Binding: > > - Jean-Baptiste Onofré > - Madhawa Gunasekara > - David Zollo > - Willem Jiang > > > Non-binding: > - Felix Cheung > - Li Gang > > The voting thread is: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lgfrsv0ymfk1c19ngnkkn46c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.14.0-rc1

+1 - LICENSE and NOTICE No binary distribution on https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/devlake/0.14.0-incubating-rc1/ (note: some binary dependency has NOTICE). - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.13.0-rc1

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files these file should have ASF header: ./plugins/azure/impl/impl.go ./plugins/azure/models/build.go ./plugins/azure/models/migrationscripts/archived/build.go

Re: Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.13.0-rc1

Remember to put [VOTE] at the beginning of the email subject. On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:47 AM Liang Zhang wrote: > Hello all, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.13.0-rc1 > > The Apache DevLake community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release >

Re: [VOTE] Retire Hivemall from Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 7:06 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 27, 2022, at 11:57 PM, Calvin Kirs wrote: > > > > Hi IPMC, > > > > Hivemall has been incubating since 2016-09-13. > > > > From last year, activity has been low and the chances

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.2.1-incubating-rc1

Source code and binaries: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sedona/1.2.1-incubating-rc1/ On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 9:22 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > Can you please include the link to dist source package ? That's the > most important thing to check. > > Thanks, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.2.1-incubating-rc1

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine Note: is the community ready for the full DISCLAIMER (not -DISCLAIMER-WIP) in the next release? - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers Note: /binder/*.ipynb should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.12.0-rc2

t; > > > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/devlake/KEYS > > Thanks > > Klesh Wong > > > On 22/08/07 11:26PM, Felix Cheung wrote: > > Is the signing key in the KEYS file? It seems I’m getting an error. > > > > - incubating in name > > - si

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.12.0-rc2

Is the signing key in the KEYS file? It seems I’m getting an error. - incubating in name - signature and hash fine gpg: Can't check signature: No public key - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE is fine NOTICE should say Apache DevLake (incubating) - No unexpected binary files - All source files have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.11.0-rc1

I’d recommend it for the very first release. It might work without, or it might take quite a bit of effort. On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 12:27 PM Hezheng Yin wrote: > Hi Felix, thanks for the suggestion. If we were able to resolve the > licensing issues Justin raised, would you still recommend us

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.11.0-rc1

I would strongly suggest having the WIP DISCLAIMER also On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 8:08 AM Hezheng Yin wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you all for your guidance. This is extremely helpful as DevLake works > towards its first ASF release. We'll address all the feedback and re-start > the voting process. >

Re: [VOTE] Retire Crail

+1 (As mentor) On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:48 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > After years of declining activity[1][2], and following discussions on > dev@ [3][4] the Crail podling has voted to retire from incubation > [5][6]. Per policy [7] I am proposing an IPMC vote to retire Crail. > > The vote is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Uniffle into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:47 AM Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 at 9:50 AM, Young Seung Andrew Ko < > youngseung.and...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Thank you :) > > > > 2022년 6월 1일 (수) 오후 12:25, Sammi Chen 님이 작성: > > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache InLong(Incubating) as a TLP

+1 binding On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 6:14 PM li gang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Charles Zhang 于2022年5月25日周三 14:34写道： > > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > > > > > The InLong community has a discussion thread [1], passed the community > vote > > [2], and the vote result is published [3].

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Same here, would love to see if I can help, Jerry. On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:31 PM Saisai Shao wrote: > Thanks Weiwei, let me add you to the mentor list. > > Best regards, > Jerry > > Weiwei Yang 于2022年5月17日周二 12:18写道： > > > +1 > > This is an interesting project, I'd be happy to help the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache AGE (Incubating) as a TLP

pache AGE Project be and hereby is responsible for > > > > the creation and maintenance of software related to a multi-model > > > > database that enables graph and relational models built on PostgreSQL; > > > > and be it further > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:04 AM Xiaorui Wang wrote: > +1 > > Best regards, > > Xiaorui Wang 王小瑞 > Apache RocketMQ PMC chair > > > Kevin Ratnasekera 于2022年4月23日周六 00:24写道： > > > +1 ( binding ) > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 6:14 PM Madhawa Gunasekara > > wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kvrocks into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 7:28 PM Sheng Wu wrote: > +1 binding > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > Liang Chen 于2022年4月22日周五 09:19写道： > > > > +1(binding) > > > > Regards > > Liang > > > > 在 2022年4月20日星期三，Furkan KAMACI 写道： > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Kind Regards,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) v0.2.0-rc.2

+1 Note: the KEYS file does not need to be packaged into the release. - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER-WIP is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:24 AM Mingshen Sun wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 1.0.0-rc1 Release

+1 -incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 5:22 PM Nicholas Sorrell wrote: > Dear Apache Community, > > This is an official vote for the Apache AGE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.2.0-incubating-rc2

+1 On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 9:42 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Dear all, > > We still need one more vote. Can someone help us? > > Thanks, > Jia > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 5:47 PM vongosling wrote: > > > +1, binding, > > I checked: > > - incubating is in the name > > - changes since the last vote > > -

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of DevLake

added you into the mentor list > of the proposal. > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 2:45 AM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > > Interesting and unique project for incubator. > > > > Would love to help

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of DevLake

Interesting and unique project for incubator. Would love to help as mentor. On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 1:22 AM Willem Jiang wrote: > We want to propose DevLake[1] as a new Apache Incubator project. > > DevLake helps developer teams integrate and analyze software > development data throughout

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.2.0-incubating-rc1

If there is a change to NOTICE file, that should be included, the community should roll a new RC On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 12:45 AM Jia Yu wrote: > Dear incubator PPMC, > > Since we have fixed the signature issue, do you think we should restart the > voting process again, or can the PPMC who

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE Viewer 1.0.0 (rc2) Release

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - All source files have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine* checked /frontend/src/lib/cytoscape-cxtmenu - there have been major modifications to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache YuniKorn" be and > > > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the > > > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache YuniKorn > > > Project, and to have primary respon

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache AGE (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

I am definitely in private@ and in a bunch of dev@ discussion. Not sure if that was mis reported. On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:15 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > * Dehowe Feng > > * Eya Badal > > * Felix Cheung > > * Jasper Blue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.12.1 (RC1)

+1 (Sorry my +1 was cut off) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE fine - No unexpected binary files - Source files have ASF header > On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:37 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> I checked: >> - incubating

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.12.1 (RC1)

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE fine - No unexpected binary files - Source files have ASF header On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:37 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - DISCLAIMER exists > -

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

What are the concerning security vulnerabilities in log4j 1 and the severity level? I saw one mentioned in the thread which apparently redhat had fixed (with socket stream deserialization) On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 3:56 PM Martin Gainty wrote: > i would ping the original author ceki gulcu >

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

The community should definitely fix/address these. As for Committer bar, the community should review the contributors to look for sustained contributors that should be voted in. PPMC should discuss this. I couldn’t find anything about @agedb.io - can Andrew explain the connection? At least, this

Re: [VOTE] Accept SeaTunnel into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 9:52 PM Xun Liu wrote: > +1 (binding) from me > > Best Regards, > Xun Liu > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 11:43 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) > wrote: > > > +1, binding > > > > Lidong Dai 于2021年12月4日 周六10:40写道： > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.1.1-incubating-rc1

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers Note, these script should probably have the ASF header - .github/workflows/scripts/install_r_deps.sh

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE (Incubating) 0.6.0 Release

I see Bitnine is the company that donated the project AGE to Apache, so the header change seems to make sense? On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 5:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) as there is no download page and the download > links on the home page do not have hashes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.1.0-incubating-rc1

+1 Because of WIP DISCLAIMER On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 12:02 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > - incubating in name > - signature and hash fine > - DISCLAIMER is fine > - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine > - No unexpected binary files > > - source files for ASF headers > > is there

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.1.0-incubating-rc1

- incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - source files for ASF headers is there a reason this file doesn't have a header? ./sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sedona_sql/io/ImageOptions.scala On Sun,

Re: [MENTORS] Report timeline for August

al queries at low > latency. > > Olivier Lamy > > Kishore Gopalakrishna > Jim Jagielski > Olivier Lamy > Felix Cheung > > > > Regards, > Dave > > > On Jul 31, 2021, at 9:22 PM, Justin Mcle

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.11.0 (RC2)

+1 I checked that issues from RC1 are fixed On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 6:43 AM Julia Kinga Marton wrote: > Hello IPMC > > The Apache YuniKorn community has voted and approved the release of Apache > YuniKorn (incubating) 0.11.0 (RC2). We now kindly request the IPMC members > review > and vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) 0.5.0

Agreed, these were called out in our dev@ vote https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0f291fd923bd0217da1935811b4276699aac28715c1936d713e99002%40%3Cdev.age.apache.org%3E On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 4:03 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) but only because of WIP disclaimer. Normally I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.11.0

Similar questions from me - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - No unexpected binary files - LICENSE and NOTICE the ./web component is in the release but I don't see its dependencies (even as MIT licensed) listed? Is anything bundled in there? - these source

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pinot as TLP

+1 On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 6:55 PM Sheng Wu wrote: > +1 binding, good luck > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > Justin Mclean 于2021年6月24日周四 上午9:46写道： > > > +1 all the best with the rest of your journey > > > > - > > To

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

To add, the thirdeye code directory was excluded from past releases and so was _not_ part of the Pinot project release. (A topic discussed several times on list) On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 4:54 PM Mayank Shrivastava wrote: > Hi Justin, > Thank you for bringing up the discussion aspect. It seems

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Adding trademarks@ > > See https://prestodb.io/docs/current/connector.html > This is a great point but to be clear, that https://prestodb.io/ is the Presto project in the Presto Foundation,

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

it further > >> > > >> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pinot Project be and hereby is responsible > >> for the creation and maintenance of software related to distributed OLAP > >> data store to provide Real-time Analytics to power wide variety of > >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1

+1 (binding) carry over from dev@ On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 1:17 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to start a vote for Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1 > > Sedona community vote thread: > >

Re: [MENTORS] Incubator report submitted

I can sign off Sedona. Will check to update whimsy now On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 11:57 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > The report has been submitted. > > The Sedona and Spot reports do not have sign-off by mentors, so please > sign off here [1] before the board meets. > > Thanks, > Justin > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.1 RC0

Carry over my vote +1 binding On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:04 PM Fu Xiang wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot (incubating) version > 0.7.1. > > Apache Pinot (incubating) is a distributed columnar storage engine that can > ingest data in realtime and serve

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.10.0

+1 binding - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine you should include year 2021 in NOTICE - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:37 AM Kris Calvin wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

my +1 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 11:03 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> I propose that we run the vote anyway, thus ensuring IPMC oversight and > >> (post)approval, and then update the release runbook to make sure this > &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

m IPMC was > missed before making the release. > > What is the right thing to do at this point? Should we cut another release > or can we go ahead with this and ensure that this does not happen again. > > thanks, > Kishore G > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:59 AM Felix Cheung > w

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

Unfortunately this isn’t the right process for a podling release. As the mentor, I am sorry to see the release is not up to the standard upheld by previous releases. On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:02 AM kezhenxu94@apache wrote: > I think this release violates the Apache release policy because it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.0-incubating rc1

; >> >> >> >> On 02/4/2021 11:47，Jia Yu wrote： >> Dear all, >> >> We need to collect more votes in order to get this approved. Please take a >> look at our release when you have time. >> >> Thank you very much! >> Jia >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.0-incubating rc1

che APISIX PMC Chair > Twitter: _WenMing > > > Jia Yu 于2021年2月4日周四 上午11:47写道： > > > Dear all, > > > > We need to collect more votes in order to get this approved. Please take > a > > look at our release when you have time. > > > > Thank yo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.0-incubating rc1

+1 (binding) Carry from dev@ On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:02 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to start a vote for the first release of Apache Sedona > 1.0.0-incubating rc1 > > Sedona community vote thread: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.6.0 RC1

gt; that the next POC will pick it up. > > Thanks, > Jack > > On 2020/11/11 04:05:49, Felix Cheung wrote: > > +1 but > > > > it was discussed before, but thirdeye is not included in the source > release > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.6.0 RC1

+1 but it was discussed before, but thirdeye is not included in the source release https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/blob/master/pinot-distribution/pinot-source-assembly.xml#L39 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

+1 binding On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:21 AM Timothy Chen wrote: > +1 binding as well > > Tim > > Sent via Superhuman iOS > > > On Wed, Oct 21 2020 at 08:18, Sebastian Schelter wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > On 2020/10/19 17:29:23, Tianqi Chen wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a Top Level Project

+1 ;) On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 2:31 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for addressing everything I brought up here and on your private > list. There's still a little more to do, but it’s being dealt with, so I’m > all good with you graduating. Do keep an eye on how you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.2

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - did not compile On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:31 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > > > +1 (binding, carrying over my

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.1

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:37 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > The Apache Superset (incubating) community has voted on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC2

+1 Thanks for the update. - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files find (some test .gz are there) - Source files have ASF headers (except tests & config) - Did not try compile from source On Fri, Sep 4, 2020

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC1 (Please ignore the earlier email sent under non apache Email)

It’s a bit strange under node_modules. - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - Unexpected binary files Several strange files are in the source tarball

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

+1 (binding) On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Tianqi Chen wrote: > Dear Incubator: > > > > Following a heated discussion with great support from our mentors, > > committers and community members. > > The Apache(incubating) TVM community has formally voted for graduation and > > bring the case

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.9.0 (release candidate 1)

+1 binding - incubating in name - signature and hash are fine - tarball (see note) the file unpacks into the current and not a subdirectory, is a bit strange - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - build from source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.9.0

I see jlowe is a binding IPMC vote that can carry forward from dev@ vote. We just need 1 more binding vote. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:06 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - incubating in name > - signature and hash fine > - DISCLAIMER is fine > - LICENSE a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.9.0

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - didn't try - compile from source On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:12 PM Wilfred Spiegelenburg wrote: > Hello IPMC > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

Moon is now on IPMC. On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:26 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Thanks Dave, > > > > That's great news! I look forward to releasing in 5 hours then! > > > > Ville > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 16:49 Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > Moon’s vote will become binding in 5 hours when 72

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

One more vote please! On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:59 AM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > We need one more vote please, we're anxious to publish this release! > > > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 11:17 AM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > > > F

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

Furkan, can you help? On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:54 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Justin and Felix, > > > > warm thanks for taking the time to vote! The minimum 72h voting time is > now complete, and it would be great to get that last missing vote from the > IPMC to be able to release this highly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

(Carry my vote, as stated already) +1 On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:20 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > The Apache Superset (incubating) community has voted on and approved a > proposal to > release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0. > The voting thread can be found here: >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

Hi, With 6 binding +1 votes, and no -1, to vote to accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator CLOSED and the vote has PASSED. [6] +1 Binding votes: - Jean-Baptiste Onofre - Dave Fisher - Kevin Ratnasekera - Furkan KAMACI - Willem Jiang - Felix Cheung [ 0 ] +0 Binding votes [ 0 ] -1 Binding votes

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 6:19 AM Willem Jiang wrote: > +1 （binding) > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:49 AM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > As we discussed the S

[VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

Hi, As we discussed the Sedona proposal [1], I would like to call for a vote to accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator. Sedona is a big geospatial data processing engine. The system provides an easy to use Scala, SQL, and Python APIs for spatial data scientists to manage, wrangle, and process

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

ard to it! > > > > Jia Yu > > Ph.D. in Computer Science > > Arizona State University <http://www.asu.edu/> > > Reach me via: Homepage <http://jiayuasu.github.io/> | GitHub > <https://github.com/jiayuasu> > &

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

u are > interested. > > Best Regards, > Von Gosling > > > On Jul 9, 2020, at 9:12 PM, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We would like to propose Apache Sedona, currently known in its community > as > > GeoSpark, as a new project under the Apa

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

Noted below. I will leave others to add anything I’ve missed. On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:15 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Currently PiPy is not an ASF supported platform and you may have some > difficulty in complying with ASF policies. Are you aware of the trademark, > branding and other

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

com/jiayuasu> > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:46 PM Dave Fisher >> wrote: >> >>> Hi - >>> >>> You note over 30 contributors to GeoSpark, but there are only 8 initial >>> committers. Has the move to the Apache Incubator been thoroughly discussed >&

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

Any questions or concerns? If not, I can kick off the VOTE thread shortly. On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:12 AM Felix Cheung wrote: > Hi, > > We would like to propose Apache Sedona, currently known in its community > as GeoSpark, as a new project under the Apache Incubator. > &g

  1   2   >