Hi,
I will have the possibility to handle a *istD at the weekend. If I shall
try soemthing for you, then tell me. I will take some FA-lenses with me,
a SMC-M 10/2.8 and my AF500FTZ.
Cheers, Heiko
See if the eyepiece is coated glass. Just rub it when the saleman looked
elsewhere. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I will have the possibility to handle a *istD at the weekend. If I shall
try soemthing for you, then tell me. I will take some FA-lenses with me,
a SMC-M 10/2.8 and my
Fra: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 09:22:49 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
Is there anyone on the list with Access experience who can answer some
questions?
There's only one question that matters when Access is involved. And
the answer is run fast, run far, run
on 10.09.03 5:54, Doug Franklin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is, avoid it at all costs. Are you using OSX? If so, there are
tons of open source databases out there, and almost any of them will
beat Access in the long term.
And there is always very good FileMaker - for both - Classic
On 9/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
apparently our Cotty is looking for a motor MX.. somehow he's going to
try to boost frame rate on the Frankencamera (Canax?).
Now that would be an interesting exercise ;-)
Sadly nothing like it - just browsing. I had the drive on a couple of
Hi,
Thanks for the replies.
What I was subtly trying to ask was: is Bill OK? I was off list for all
of August and might have missed any announcements.
mike
On 9/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
here it is.
http://www.catskillregionguide.com/
local magazine with a circulation of about 30,000.
Herb
Really nice shot Herb.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Strange opinion. I don't like Microsoft. I've never met anyone who does. But
Nova, a successful Finnish Financial software package, was written with
Access. It's been selling quite well for many years and is up to version 5
or 6 now. I used Access myself to make a billing system some years back
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Cotty wrote:
So really, the following could well be true:
'Noting that a pretty young woman called Siobhan in Ireland is building
G5 Macs,...'
This is just _so_ wrong! EVERYBODY knows that Niamh builds the Macs.
Siobhan is the secretary!
Hope this helps :-)
Chris (wish
Hi,
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 8:52:02 AM, you wrote:
Fra: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 09:22:49 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
Is there anyone on the list with Access experience who can answer some
questions?
There's only one question that matters when Access
Hi,
Cotty wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2950550386category=29982
and
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2950546482category=15240
As an inexperienced Ebayer, my intital response to these two pages is
that I wouldn't go near this (these?) person(s)
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Amita Guha wrote:
I've been looking around online and some people talk about using step-up
rings...could I perhaps use a normal-width filter with a step-up ring
and avoid vignetting that way?
Yes, this was discussed at about the same time (or even in the same
thread) as
Hi,
An interesting selection of gear. Especially the LX titanium(?) plus
winder and battery pack thrown on the top of the pile. I don't look
after my own gear as well as I would like (yes, there is Irish blood in
my background) but I would be embarassed to show this to the world.
Most of it
Hi all,
you may think I'm trying to collect Pentax lenses...
I'm still considering to get a good zoom for parties, weddings, any
situation where switching primes can be tedious and makeing me miss shots.
There's an A28-135/4 on a secondhand site for sale at about 200$. From what
I've read on
OK, I've had a look:
You could start by trying this:
Under tools you choose relations and make a one to many link from the film number
in the film table to the film number in the image table. If you have mistyped some
film number you may get an error.
Next, when making a form for image data
I have never used the zooms you mentioned, but the issue assoicated with the
SMC-A 28-135/4 is weight. Other lenses you might consider included SMC-A
35-105/3.5 Tamron SP 28-75/2.8.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
you may think I'm trying to collect Pentax lenses...
I'm still
Heiko, some image samples with noise reduction off, at 200 and
1600 ASA, also some raw samples...
Servus, Alin
Heiko wrote:
HH I will have the possibility to handle a *istD at the weekend. If I shall
HH try soemthing for you, then tell me. I will take some FA-lenses with me,
HH a
Alan Chan wrote:
I have never used the zooms you mentioned, but the issue
assoicated with the
SMC-A 28-135/4 is weight.
Hi Alan,
Long ago I resolved that I would bear the weight of any lens
that helped me produce the results I wanted. big grin
The SMC-A 28-135/4 did not last long in my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark wrote:
What I'm most interested in is a way of automatically populating fields
in the Individual prints table with information from the film rolls
table after I enter the film roll # in a form.
OK, I've had a look:
You could start by trying this:
Under
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: Enlarger Prices
Were I new in the market for a Beseler enlarger, I would skip the 6x7 and
jump straight into a 23C.
William Robb
William.
Does the 23C take 6x6 or 6x7 carriers.I'm assumming they
Do they do this because the price of land (space) is so precious
and the price of Pentax gear is so cheap? (relatively speaking g )
Bob S.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Damn
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One more link here:
Hi all.
I plan to put an SF-1 and Sigma 100-300af on ebay soon.I now have some time to be able
to
monitor
and reply to any emails.
Some may remember i had a problem with 3-4 rolls of film out of the 20 odd that i
shot.The
odd
on 9/10/03 1:56 AM, Heiko Hamann at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I will have the possibility to handle a *istD at the weekend. If I shall
try soemthing for you, then tell me. I will take some FA-lenses with me,
a SMC-M 10/2.8 and my AF500FTZ.
Cheers, Heiko
I would like to see a photo
Bruce is the official PUGmeister. And how says PUGmeister Bruce?
Alright, that was funny. I've had every single one of those things happen -
and always at deadline. I think it's the curse we suffer for relying on
machines. I've always thought morale would go up if we were allowed to
ritually sacrifice pieces of equipment now and then.
- Original Message
I wondered if Bill's Pow-Wow shot was in the PUG and spent some time
looking through his sizeable portfolio there - so Pugster came to mind.
- MCC
At 03:54 PM 9/9/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
Mark wrote:
Bill Casselberry (a former PUGster)
I usually read PUGster as synonymous with PDMLer.
Congrats, Herb!
At 04:33 PM 9/9/2003 -0400, you wrote:
here it is.
http://www.catskillregionguide.com/
local magazine with a circulation of about 30,000.
Herb
-
Mark Cassino
Kalamazoo, MI
-
Photography:
http://www.markcassino.com
Is this a private collection or does this guy own a store? If this is
just a hobby, I think we can safely say that he's not bothered by the
price of the *istD. Maybe we could write to him and have a PDML meeting
at his house. He certainly justifies the pentax-fan title in the
URL.
Steven
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:15:53 +0100, Bob Walkden wrote:
Despite all its faults, Access is an extremely useful
prototyping tool.
That I'll agree with. Prototype to your heart's content. And it's OK
for small databases with low turnover in the data, if you don't mind
taking customer calls
Chris Stoddart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Cotty wrote:
So really, the following could well be true:
'Noting that a pretty young woman called Siobhan in Ireland is building
G5 Macs,...'
This is just _so_ wrong! EVERYBODY knows that Niamh builds the Macs.
Siobhan is the
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 9:52:02 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] for small firms and home use it's OK. [...]
A critical caveat. I agree. For home use it's probably OK.
The only problem we had was that our based was built in Access
2.0, but when Access 97 arrived it turneed out that M$ had
Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here it is.
http://www.catskillregionguide.com/
local magazine with a circulation of about 30,000.
Congrats, Herb! My first cover shot was an Adirondacks sports magazine
(though not nearly as good a shot as yours) - we're going to have to go
on an upstate
Paul,
I owned an A28-135/4 for a while. The photo quality was good, but it is
indeed a large lens. It has a very large front element (77mm filter
diameter) and only does macro (close focus) at its 28mm setting. Try one if
you can to see if you like the handling.
--Mark
Paul Writes-
Patrick Wunsch wrote:
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag, which ones would you
chose and why. I ask this because I am trying to narrow down my choices
and
assess my needs versus wants while still be able to pay the mortgage!
I have the K1000 and ZX-5n cameras and am most
on 9/10/03 9:56 AM, Patrick Wunsch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag, which ones would you
chose and why. I ask this because I am trying to narrow down my choices and
assess my needs versus wants while still be able to pay the mortgage!
I
I love my
24/2.8
50/1.7
85/1.8
If I would have to add one more, I think it would either be the
Tokina 17/3.5
or my
100/4 macro.
I seldom use my 200/4, though I have the Pentax 2x converter giving me a
400/8.
:-)
Paul Delcour
From: whickersworld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
My pic would be a basic line-up.
M 28mm f3.5
FA 50mm f1.4
A 100mm f4.0
K 200mm f4.0
A messy line-up from K to FA.
Unfortunately I haven't got the Pentax 2x converter for extra tele. It's on
my to get and get it quick list.
I would put these friends on MX and MZ-5 (ZX-5)
Hans B.
The fact that there are freebees out there that work better (at least for
programmers) doesn't make Access seem all that good either. When Access came
out I played with it. I simply could not do what I needed to do with it.
Upgraded to 2.0, and found the same limitations. I have not even bothered
on 10.09.03 17:32, Boris Liberman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax SMC-FA 3,5-5.6/28-90mm, (130 Euros)
28/50/90mm: 68/75/65 pts, averag 69 pts.
Pentax SMC-FA 3,2-4,5/28-105mm, (300 Euros)
28/70/105mm: 66/66/65 pts, average 66 pts.
Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems like the first
Right. We need another distinction for the reigning submitter. How
about GrandPUGster ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/10/03 09:39AM
- Original Message -
From: Steve Desjardins
Subject: Re: Top five PUG submitters
Bruce is the official PUGmeister. And how says PUGmeister Bruce?
Actually,
Am I correct in assuming that Manual Diaphragm Lenses, like the old 400
f5.6, will work fine on the *istD with stop down metering?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 23C handles film sizes from Minox to 2-1/2x3-1/2 (slightly larger than
6x9) and there was a carrier for just about everything inbetween. As far as
I know all versions 23C no matter when made use the same accessories so they
are easier to find than accessories for Omega enlargers which changed
Beauty. I really like these blurred stream pictures, and this is a good
one.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/09/03 04:33PM
here it is.
http://www.catskillregionguide.com/
local magazine with a circulation of about 30,000.
Herb
See how many pictures you can take in continous mode. There's a
controversy on its real number, there are quotes from as low as five to
as high as 8. Also try to get a feel for shutter lag.
Thanks,
rg
Heiko Hamann wrote:
Hi,
I will have the possibility to handle a *istD at the weekend. If
Grats on the cover shot, Herb. Feels good, doesn't it?
--graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/03
Just 3 would I use in that scenario:
A generally affordable set
--
24mm
50mm
100mm
But if one must have 4 ...
A nice set
--
31mm
43mm
77mm
150mm
I don't go as far as recommending 200mm because of size.
The set of 3 is lighter easier to carry.
--
--
Collin Brendemuehl
KC8TKA
Primes?
20mm
28mm
50mm
135mm
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
-Original Message-
From:
What they don't say is that in every case individual examples of each model
lens can very +-10 points or so. In other words, just like all such tests
the only value to the test is they help sell magazines. The final and
absolute test of any lens is do YOU like the photos YOU get with it.
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax SMC-FA 3,5-5.6/28-90mm, (130 Euros)
28/50/90mm: 68/75/65 pts, averag 69 pts.
Pentax SMC-FA 3,2-4,5/28-105mm, (300 Euros)
28/70/105mm: 66/66/65 pts, average 66 pts.
Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems like the first of the two is a
kit zoom
But I gues the PDML is right, right?
:-)
Paul Delcour
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:25:35 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lens test in German Color Foto
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003
Hi!
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:24:21 -0400
T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What they don't say is that in every case individual examples of each
model
lens can very +-10 points or so. In other words, just like all such
tests
the only value to the test is they help sell magazines. The final
... I've found a 43/1.9 in Germany,
but is there one in NA that's available?
--
--
Collin Brendemuehl
KC8TKA
The problems are so over-rated.
-- Petula Clark
--
Cotty wrote:
On 10/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Cotty wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d
ll?ViewItemitem=2950550386category=29982
and
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d
ll?ViewItemitem=2950546482category=15240
As an inexperienced Ebayer, my intital response
This is an interesting question to me because I normally carry 4 lenses in
my camera bag.
24mm/2.0 Vivitar
50mm/1.7 Pentax-M
100mm/2.8 Pentax-M
80/200mm/2.8 Tokina
+ a 2x teleconverter to make the Tokina a 160-400/5.6
The reason I use the Vivitar and the 1.7 is because the M24/2.8 and M50/1.4
Not so, Mark. Lens testing is a good way to find out if a particular lens is
defective. I try to do a test (brick wall) of every lens I buy before the
return period is up. Said test also gives one an idea just what are the
strong and weak points of that particular lens. Hum... Notice what I keep
The reason for slow kit lenses scoring better in Color Foto than
their faster and more expensive counterparts is quite simple: they
test lenses wide open and two stops down. So a slow zoom is tested
at let's say f5.6 and f11, while a fast expensive 2.8 lens is tested
at f2.8 and 5.6. They
Scott D wrote:
Pretty funny link, mac users with bandwidth to spare will especially
enjoy it. bg
http://www.waveworks.net/mac.html
This one wouldn't even complete loading unless I downloaded Macromedial
Flash 6 player.
That sort of coercion I can do without! So I passed...
Great set indeed. I mostly use 24/2 and 77/1.8 as well. The third in
the bag is 50/1.7. If there is a place for a fourth lens in the bag,
then I take 80-320 zoom which I would change in a split second for a
high quality AF 70-200/4 or similiar, if pentax would make it.
Matjaz
I love my
To all interested parties,
We are going to have a NorCal outing on September 20th. Planning on a
day shooting at Point Reyes. Here is a link to some photos of the
area:
http://www.pointreyesvisions.com/NewFiles/R%20Folios/RB%20PR%20Color%20Folio.html
Should be great photo opportunities, a
And, then again, maybe it is a set up studio shot.
--graywolf (playing devils advocate)
http://graywolfphoto.com
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 4:52 AM
Subject: Re: some more *ist D samples (Pentax
Unfortenatly I'm in the Netherlands that day (like most of my days).
Otherwise you could count me in :-)
Hans B.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2003 19:27
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: NorCal PDML Get together
To
Small bag in the car right now...
A20mm/2.8
K24mm/2.8
FA43mm/1.9
FA77mm/1.9
and LX body
Sometimes the 24-43-77 are replaced by
M50mm/1.4 and
A100/2.8 Macro
...still a small kit, but not cheap!
Regards, Bob S.
Patrick Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could only have four lenses in your
Patrick Wunsch wrote:
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag,
which ones would you
chose and why. I ask this because I am trying to narrow
down my choices and
assess my needs versus wants while still be able to pay
the mortgage!
I have the K1000 and ZX-5n cameras and am most
På onsdag, 10. september 2003, kl. 15:23, skrev Mark Roberts:
This little project of mine is only for my personal use and will stay
on
Access 97 forever. It's just kind of nice to have a database that
works
exactly the way I want it and doesn't do anything more or less than I
need.
Just
Hi. I am new to this group, but not new to Pentax. I have been happily using Pentax
equipment for 15 years. The four lenses that I would not be without are:
1. 20mm f2.8
2. 31mm limited
3. 77mm limited
4. Tamron 24-135mm SP zoom
The quality of the Limited lenses speak for themselves, the 20mm
On 10/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Right. We need another distinction for the reigning submitter. How
about GrandPUGster ?
Pugzilla?
Pugeroy?
Pugenon?
Pugicist?
PUG*ist???
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Hi,
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 2:30:15 PM, you wrote:
Anyone any experience with MySQL?
http://www.pgro.uk7.net/qu071401.htm
and
http://www.pgro.uk7.net/brand1.htm
should tell you all you need to know about MySQL.
I worked for a dot.com a few years ago who had their warehousing
database
Hi,
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 2:30:15 PM, you wrote:
Anyone any experience with MySQL?
http://www.pgro.uk7.net/qu071401.htm
and
http://www.pgro.uk7.net/brand1.htm
should tell you all you need to know about MySQL.
Yep. It isn't a suitable tool for database wonks.
It's
or the Finger Lakes. i've been meaning to head up that way sometime in the
near future. not many backcountry landscape photographers on this mailing
list though.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003
Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was in BH today and they are accepting orders for
it now. i have to wait a little, but by next week, i
plan to place my order.
I checked with the generally-best retail camera dealer in Cambridge, UK
today, and they expect to have stock by the end of
How about the Grand PUG-bah?
Bruce
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 1:04:43 PM, you wrote:
C On 10/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Right. We need another distinction for the reigning submitter. How
about GrandPUGster ?
C Pugzilla?
C Pugeroy?
C Pugenon?
C Pugicist?
C PUG*ist???
it's more complicated than that. i have been developing a relationship with
the magazine and just submitted my third article with photos to them for
publication. the three articles were prearranged and written to a topic we
agreed on and a photo count. i also entered their photo contest and this
i don't own the 15mm f3.5 so i would substitute my Sigma 15-30mm f3.5-4.5.
if i had one, i would keep it in my kit too. i would also subsitute the FA
50mm f2.8m Macro for the 43mm. my personal preferences. my other two lenses
are the same as Mark's choices.
Herb
- Original Message -
Just how larger are files from each of the quality settings?
CW
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
Patrick Wunsch wrote:
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag,
which ones would you chose and why. I ask this because I am trying to narrow
down my choices and assess my needs versus wants while still be able to pay
the mortgage!
I have the K1000 and ZX-5n cameras and am most
On 10/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
They appear to me as two different sellers. The first one looks fine -
good feedback. The second one I wouldn't personally buy from, but then I
demand pretty good feedback levels. 98.6% positive ain't high enough for
me, especially on only 134
On 10/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Let me know if
you have interest in attending.
Believe me Bruce, I have an interest in attending.
Northern California, huh? I went there once as a kid. Very grey skies if
I remember correctly, with the occasional whale bone monument next to
beach-side
Excellent advice all around, Patrick!
If an item has a reserve on it, I usually don't bid. Why bother? I'm looking
for a bargain, not something with a reserve set at around the KEH price!
That's doubly true if it has a BIN and a reserve, since the reserve is
inevitably set at the same price
The Pug-a-tollah?
Pug-sley?
Bruce Dayton wrote:
How about the Grand PUG-bah?
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
frank theriault wrote:
Excellent advice all around, Patrick!
If an item has a reserve on it, I usually don't bid. Why bother? I'm looking
for a bargain, not something with a reserve set at around the KEH price!
That's doubly true if it has a BIN and a reserve, since the reserve is
Keith Whaley wrote:
prices for everything, but to offer my pretty little camera part, babied
and tended as such for years, is hardly worth lowering to the junk table
at the Good Will Store prices.
Bingo! Hand that man a cigar!!!
--
Later,
Gary
--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked
Massive Masochist
Cotty wrote:
On 10/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Right. We need another distinction for the reigning submitter. How
about GrandPUGster ?
Pugzilla?
Pugeroy?
Pugenon?
Pugicist?
PUG*ist???
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
I think the discussion of Reserves and BIN's needs to distinguish between
dealers and hobbyists. Dealers will set a Reserve at wholesale + x%, and
then make a bit more by overcharging shipping. I (and other hobbyists I have
observed) will:
a. forego a reserve on lower value items;
b. protect their
on 9/10/03 3:41 PM, Herb Chong at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or the Finger Lakes. i've been meaning to head up that way sometime in the
near future. not many backcountry landscape photographers on this mailing
list though.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL
Well, don't see why they can't put up a minimum bid so anyone can see
what they will take for the item, and can not waste time bidding on
something that won't sell for what they want to pay. All a reserve is is
a hidden minimum. Of course if all you want is to get an idea what your
item is
Humm.Some good advice from those who responded,thanks folks.
My main concern is that i am not 100% sure this camera will not cause problems in the
very
near future
and i dont want to be labeled a bad seller right of the bat,i plan on selling it below
average resale
price.I'll probably put a low
Money weight no object:
FA* 24
FA* 28-70
FA* 80-200
FA* 250 -600
Less range, all primes, and FAR less money weight
L 31
L 43
L 77
FA 100 Macro
Less Range and Money:
FA 24-90
FA 100 Macro
F 70-210
F* 300
And to the venerable Bill C. from the beautiful Oregon Coast, we all
hope you are out
Hi, Keith,
I don't want a steal, but I know what I want to pay for something, and I don't want
to pay more. Is that a bad thing?
A seller has the right to start an auction at whatever price he/she wants. They have
the right to put whatever reserve they want on it. I don't begrudge them that.
At 11:55 AM 9/9/2003 +, Paul Delcour wrote:
Anyone have any experience with this Pentax fish-eye zoom? I'd like a
fish-eye and am doubting between the prime and the zoom. I already have a
Tokina 17mm/3.5 super wide angle and need more width.
It's not my most used lens, but I do use this from
Many congrats, Herb! That's a beautiful shot.
Amita
Dag, we've used Access too for various applications over the years,
including an Access 2 program that currently runs in 38 hospitals in our
state, and an Access 95 (became 97) program that manages the maintenance of
our city council's mobile phones and radios assets (over 3000 units). In
all,
Money weight no object:
FA* 24
FA* 28-70
FA* 80-200
FA* 250 -600
I'd consider substituting the 17-35 Fisheye at the wide end.
That's actually a lens that's high on my 'want' list. Not that
I'll get a chance to buy one all that soon - buying a *ist-D has
more than used up my
Herb Chong wrote:
here it is.
http://www.catskillregionguide.com/
local magazine with a circulation of about 30,000.
Herb
HErb - terrific!
The repro on the site is less than terrific tho - I
tried
to get it up to screen size and no go...
Was Imissing something?
Do you have a link
499 Euro is more than 550 dollars. Too much.
Paul Delcour wrote:
Hi all,
for those interested, there's one on ebay.de
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2949438406category=12877
499 euro!
:-)
Paul Delcour
the image size is pretty small and they don't have a link to anything
larger. here is where it is on my web site:
http://users.bestweb.net/~hchong/Random/Selected_Images3.htm. it's most of
the way down the page. click on it to get a larger view. they cropped the
edges to get a vertical shot.
Apple has never produced chips. Even the Apple // used chips from other
suppliers. Of course PC makers don't manufacture their processors. Same
thing. Different name.
Chris Murray wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Noting that IBM is building the G5 Macs, it looks like
Evenin' Frank,
frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Keith,
I don't want a steal, but I know what I want to pay for something, and I don't want
to pay more. Is that a bad thing?
Nope. Not at all.
A seller has the right to start an auction at whatever price he/she wants. They have
the right to
The SMC-A 28-135/4 did not last long in my outfit, because I had
to draw the line at holding a heavy lens that had such severe
rectilinear distortion. heavy frown
[and I replied] It is true that the A 28-135/4's strongest point
is certainly not its distortion (it does have a fair amount of
I have an old model camera, Pentax SF10 w/Sunpak auto 266 D thyristor flash.
Now whether that means anything to anyone is my guess (but I'm hoping it
does) :)
The flash syncing with the shutter is very unpredictable and I'm not sure
what to do about it. I have the Pentax manual but it's
99 matches
Mail list logo
