* Andrew Dunbar hippytr...@gmail.com [Sat, 12 Feb 2011 03:58:49
+1100]:
On 11 February 2011 22:18, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Andrew Dunbar
hippytr...@gmail.com
wrote:
It doesn't work for me )-:
Your input can't be opened:
VLC is unable to
Greetings,
As you may know, the Wikimedia teach team has started to upgrade
MediaWiki on some wikis. MediaWiki is the software that runs all
Wikimedia wikis.
The most visible change for Wikimedia users will be the deployment of
ResourceLoader [1].
ResourceLoader optimizes the use of JavaScript
What kind of issues are expected concretely?
Is there any kinds of checklist or todo?
Original Message
Subject: [Wikitech-l] [ResourceLoader] JavaScript may break on your wiki: Fix
it before that happens
From: Guillaume Paumier gpaum...@wikimedia.org
To: Wikimedia Foundation
2011/2/12 青子守歌 (aokomoriuta) maill...@enmps.net:
What kind of issues are expected concretely?
Is there any kinds of checklist or todo?
Trevor probably knows more about this, but what I can tell you at
least is that some wikis load their own version of jQuery in their
site JS, which can break
On 11/02/11 00:24, Platonides wrote:
snip
And many don't even perform one edit. As I don't believe so many people
create them just to change their preferences, it is a mistery for me why
do they do so.
My brother is always logged in but barely edit anything. The top reasons
are:
- he uses
These have been circulating in the open source Twitterspere today.
They struck me as apposite to discussions on these topics around
MediaWiki.
How to write a roadmap:
http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2011/02/07/drawing-up-a-roadmap/
How to grow your contributor community (and how to decimate it):
On Samstag, 12. Februar 2011 at 17:55, David Gerard wrote:
How to grow your contributor community (and how to decimate it):
http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/open-source-community-simplified/
and imo, wikimedia fails at a lot of these points:
*Quote: Respond to contributions immediately.
For the last months I have been going through Bugzilla and what strikes me
is that we are not using it as efficiently as other communities do. In
particular, there is little follow up to reported problems (as Leo mentioned
as well). On the short term, I think we can have a bugathon to clean up
Have a bugathon where we label a lot of bugs as appropriate bugathon bugs
that need either:
a) test patch / update patch to recent svn version
a) confirmation / replication of new / unconfirmed bugs
We can provide a simple ready to go Wiki installation for people to use for
bug triaging and
Thank you for your advice.
You mean we should be careful about upgrading jQuery's version if the script
uses jQuery,
i.e. the problem you refer to is not caused if we dont' use jQuery, right?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] [ResourceLoader] JavaScript may break on
Another thing:
The html might have changed at a few places (for example galleries), so scripts
which do some dom manipulation could be affected as well
Leo
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 at 10:53 PM, 青子守歌 (aokomoriuta) wrote:
Thank you for your advice.
You mean we should be careful about
I think one way that non technical people can help is by trying to replicate
bugs, if they follow the steps as described in the bugreport Do you get the
same malfunction or not. That would be a great help as it weeds out invalid
bugreports
Sent from my iPhone
On 2011-02-12, at 17:26, phoebe
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
Have a bugathon where we label a lot of bugs as appropriate bugathon bugs
that need either:
a) test patch / update patch to recent svn version
a) confirmation / replication of new / unconfirmed bugs
We can provide a simple
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Leo diebu...@gmail.com wrote:
*Quote: Respond to contributions immediately.
This is what I think bugs me the most. There are heaps of bugs which have had
patches attached for month or years. For newcomers, who maybe spent a lot of
time on these, it's just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article AANLkTi=nq2tookvgmhrxbegvr6fzxe1wzv9dbzde4...@mail.gmail.com,
Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
Have a bugathon where we label a lot of bugs as appropriate bugathon bugs
that need either:
a) test patch / update patch to recent svn
I believe the next hack-a-ton is in Berlin, soon.
Perhaps requiring people to travel to another country to participate in
this is part of the problem. I don't doubt that real-life meetings are
useful for Wikimedia Foundation employees and existing MW contributors,
but it doesn't do much to
Leo diebu...@gmail.com writes:
*Quote: Respond to contributions immediately.
This is what I think bugs me the most. There are heaps of bugs which
have had patches attached for month or years. For newcomers, who maybe
spent a lot of time on these, it's just rude to neither commit them
nor
Someone posted a link to
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/Category:Hogtie_bondage
Delving further, we find
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/Main_Page says
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, when in fact the real site is
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
I don't understand the email also... The secure site has been arround
for years...
2011/2/13, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com:
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Someone posted a link to
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/Category:Hogtie_bondage
Delving further, we find
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:02 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Someone posted a link to
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/Category:Hogtie_bondage
M.
Delving further, we find
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/Main_Page says
Welcome to Wikimedia
Guillaume Paumier wrote:
The installation of ResourceLoader may cause compatibility issues with
existing JavaScript code.
It'd be nice to have a list of things that will definitely be problematic
(must be fixed), things that might be problematic (should be fixed), and
things that are generally
Fine.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Someone posted a link to
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/Category:Hogtie_bondage
Delving further, we find
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/Main_Page says
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, when in fact the real site is
He's complaining, in effect, that there are more than one URL for identical
content, which is in fact generally a bad idea, but in this case, of course,
he's wrong: different *access protocols* are being used, so it's not possible
to conform the two...
Whether it is in fact still a Best Practice
- Original Message -
From: Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com
In fact on any page on either site, one cannot find any link to the
corresponding page on the other site.
Yeah, secure.wikimedia.org's URL scheme isn't really friendly
to outsiders. Historically, this is because SSL
25 matches
Mail list logo
