i suppose if you are using final scratch to DJ its good to have reliable high quality rips, also some sites let you just download each track from am album so you don't end up with fillers kicking around, for 1$ its not much to pay if you only need 1 track.
On that matter i never understand why people press albums like this anyway or 12vs. Why not put 100% good tracks on each release then people wouldn't question about buying releases or your labels. Quality controls are bad on a lot of labels although things are changing with stuff like downlow and pigna etc. Its good that now the market will change and now people will have to release good stuff as fillers just wont sell. I'm hoping more underground stuff goes the way of digital distribution. For us her in australia its getting to $$ to ship, wait and hope compared with having almost instantly. I would be buying if stuff if it is available. Someone mentioned it is too early for mp3 dj's, i disagree totally the djing is totally split now with FS and not FS dj's. There is just no way to compete with a dj with 10 days of selection and custom remixes, especially when you need to lug a huge box around and risk stuff being stolen. Things have changed already and there is no way to stop it,i think its a case of join in or loose out. Oh and another note- all those rare records you own that only got 100 releases well 2000 people have these now and can dj them, its easy to angry about this but i think there is now way to win the fight. Quest Pond -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 15 January 2004 11:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: (313) warprecords Right, nice one Brendan - now I see. Was just wondering as I don't really have any mp3's or anything, or use the peer to peer (only because work won't let me I guess). _________________________________________________________________ --------------------- End of message text -------------------- This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring
