15/1/04 12:13 PM Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> iTunes is a lot cheaper than the Warp store, I think - it's 99 cents for a
> track on iTunes, and 99 pence on Warp, so at the current exchange rate it's
> almost twice as expensive. Not sure if iTunes has a "per EP" pricing deal,
> though; what I've seen of it seems to be heavily structured around albums and
> tracks.

Apple can afford it as they have most of the kit anyway... :) And they have
a massive users advantage over Warp...


> 
> The prices of these tracks online is a bit much, I agree - you'd expect more
> discount than that. But then again this is a new way of selling music and
> people like Warp have to bear in mind that sales might be abysmally low.
> They're taking a bit of a risk by launching these services and so I think
> that's a big part of the reason the pricing is quite cautious. I don't doubt
> that if it takes off and becomes a bit of a cash cow then prices will drop -
> Warp say they're going to implement a system later on down the line where the
> cost-per-track will drop based on how many tracks you've got in an individual
> order, which would make more sense to me.

The system to set this up for Warp won't be cheap, so they have some cost to
cover - I think we have to give them some time to see how it all goes. The
GUI by Kleber is pants tho :) No need for the scroll click...

At Dust Science, we a looking a selling MP3's but ours will be sold as EPs
or as the vinyl but with add free extras, at a lower rate.

Martin




> 
> Brendan
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cobert, Gwendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 15 January 2004 12:08
>> To: 313
>> Subject: RE: (313) warprecords
>> 
>> 
>> To me it is a matter of pricing : I don't know how much
>> iTunes charges (how much is it for an Environ EP BTW ?), but
>> on the Warp site tracks are about two times more expensive as
>> I would like them to be. Since you don't have the actual
>> object anymore, it should be normal to have some discount...
>> would it be only because it also costs a lot less to the label.
>> Gwendal
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2004 13:06
>> To: 'Tom Churchill'; 'Alex Bond'; '313'
>> Subject: RE: (313) warprecords
>> 
>> 
>> -> > I was just wondering why anyone would?
>> -> > 
>> -> > I mean it's just as easy to download from a peer to peer
>> -> right, and it's
>> -> > free.
>> -> 
>> -> I wondered the same thing when Apple launched their iTunes
>> -> Music Store - but
>> -> eight months later they've sold 30 million songs. And bear
>> -> in mind the
>> -> service is only available to Mac users (approx 5% of the
>> -> market), and only
>> -> in America. So it looks like the market's definitely there...
>> 
>> there's a itunes for windows now (to access iTMS)....
>> 
>> -> While we're on the subject - would people on the list pay to
>> -> download (for
>> -> example) Headspace and Emoticon tracks as high-quality MP3s?
>> -> Trying to work
>> -> out whether it's worth exploring these alternative forms of
>> -> selling music on
>> -> such a small scale...
>> 
>> i think there will most likely be a market for this when more people
>> have the ability to dj mp3s (either through ableton live....needs mp3
>> support, or finalscratch/traktor)...not sure we're at that stage yet?
>> 
>> then again you might be tapping into a different market. environ think
>> it's there, you can get their stuff through iTunes Music
>> Service now. be
>> interesting to watch their sales, if that data is available.
>> 
>> 
>> robin...
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to