True say.

On the one hand we could take the chance to decry the futility and at times 
laughable nature of genres and their names (usually a good thing to do). We 
could also be magnanimous and reiterate how 'scene's change,' 'everything 
evolves', etc. But on the other hand there is a worthwhile point to be made 
about the way widely accepted meanings can evolve (and more sinisterly, be 
hi-jacked so that they're *made* to evolve!) in such a way that important 
social underpinnings of a genre at its outset could be potentially downplayed 
and perhaps in future, start to be forgotten.

What do we want electro to mean? 

Kraftwerk+Parliament? 

Or

Fischerspooner+Tiga?


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 03 December 2007 15:40
To: Benoît Pueyo
Cc: 313 Mailing List
Subject: Re: (313) Electro vs Electro


Fck that - just because a huge majority of people call anything with a "dance 
beat" and synths "techno" doesn't mean that we should start calling Paul 
Oakenfold sound "techno music".

Electro = Electronic Funk as in Egyptian Lover, Aux 88, Whodini, UTFO  - it's 
the in early roots of hip-hop, it's Funkadelic, it's Miami Bass, it's the 808,  
it's electrified funk/R&B/soul to the bone

Daft Punk make pop music

"Electroclash" did a great deal of harm in confusing the matter imo.

MEK




Benoît Pueyo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/02/2007 06:51:00 AM:

> I think Daft Punk cannot be qualified as Electro, simply house or 
> dance music to me.
>
> But I see what u wanted to mean : most people call that new kindof 
> dance music filled with medium distorted synths 'Electro'. A good 
> example : John Dahlback 'Blink'.
>
> To me, we have to accept to call that music 'Electro' simply becasue a 
> huge majority of people do that, and even if thus we qualify Aux88 music
>   with the same word.
>
> Words' meaning evolve, thats just about that. Before that 'Electro' 
> phenomenon came, Ive alreay thought that all this commercial wave of 
> 'house' music had probably left some bitter taste in Chicago house 
> godfatehrs' mouth... And that didnt change anything.
>
> Actually we should feel lucky that Fedde Le Grand track did not make 
> people start calling this kindof music 'Detroit Techno' ;o)
>
> Benoît.
>
> Frank Glazer a écrit :
> > daft punk has never been electro. the aux 88 i've heard is
> definitely electro.
> >
> > On Dec 1, 2007 8:40 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Are Daft Punk and Aux 88 both Electro?  Either?  Neither?
> >>
> >> m50
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to