Most of the discussion (and displeasure) seems to be about techno music transposed for a "classical" orchestra. What about going the other direction? I can't think of specific examples at the moment but I know there are classical pieces that have been interpreted by electronic/techno artists using the tools of their trade.
Is this still perceived an attempt to validate electronic music? MEK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/11/2008 09:48:53 AM: > i don't see it as cross-pollination, but rather classical > dudes playing contemporary music, possibly to get in touch > with the younger masses, to show that you can be hip even > for a classical dude, or something along those lines... > > anyway, i will check this new C2 stuff out and (like george > michael said) will "listen without prejudice" > > have a nice weekend, i'm flying off to frankfurt for party. > ciao > > f. > > ----- Original Message ----- > Da : "JT Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A : "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: 313@hyperreal.org > Oggetto : Re: (313) C2 at Carnegie Hall, well sort of > Data : Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:35:26 -0500 > > > > i was referring to a techno-classical crossover, and not > > > cross-pollination in general. and that would have been > > > quite foolish since techno is not a "pure" genre in > > anycase. > > > > eh? if you recognize cross-pollination is good, then why > > not a techno-classical crossover? > > > > > i'm sorry but i dont get the last paragraph quoted above > > > though. what do you mean by "dance music/black music vs > > > classical"? > > > > jazz was the result of black dance music crossed with > > essentially classical instrumentation.