> i was referring to a techno-classical crossover, and not > cross-pollination in general. and that would have been quite > foolish since techno is not a "pure" genre in anycase.
eh? if you recognize cross-pollination is good, then why not a techno-classical crossover? > i'm sorry but i dont get the last paragraph quoted above > though. what do you mean by "dance music/black music vs > classical"? jazz was the result of black dance music crossed with essentially classical instrumentation.
