Laurie Griffiths wrote: > For consistency, terminate all the fields in the header with ! Line ends > are then logically optional, but omitting them should be deprecated (on the > grounds of readability for humans). <snip> > X:23! > T:Bang! > K:C#! > "C#dim"[^CEG_B^c]!! What about U:s=!D.S.! U:O=!coda! (from John Atchley's 101best.abc, included in jaabc2ps) or !something!s within a tune? -- bert van vreckem If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed... Oh wait! He does! To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Frank Nordberg
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Wendy Galovich
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Wendy Galovich
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Wendy Galovich
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Laurie Griffiths
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bert Van Vreckem
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Laurie Griffiths
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Simon Wascher
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Anselm Lingnau
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Simon Wascher
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Laurie Griffiths
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Richard Robinson