Laurie wrote: >For consistency, terminate all the fields in the header with ! Line ends >are then logically optional, but omitting them should be deprecated (on the >grounds of readability for humans). > It would have been nice to have something like this from the start, but introducing it now would pose all kinds of compatibility nproblems. One thing I thought of is to introduce a checksum in the header somewhere. If the checksum doesn't match the tune you know that it's been mangled (or even edited by hand). Phil Taylor To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Frank Nordberg
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Wendy Galovich
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Wendy Galovich
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Wendy Galovich
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Laurie Griffiths
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bert Van Vreckem
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Laurie Griffiths
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Simon Wascher
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Anselm Lingnau
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Simon Wascher
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Laurie Griffiths
- Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Richard Robinson