[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Laura Conrad said - > >What we need is a developer who is going to: > > Use open source, so that anyone can fix bugs. > > > > Roll contributions from other people into the source. > > > > Implement the standard as written. > > > > Clearly label any extensions to the standard used by the > > program. > > > > Write code that can be worked on by multiple people. The fact > > that abc2ps isn't written this way is probably one of the > > major reasons for the situation described above. > > Excellent except for the first and the last. Do you intend to outlaw > independant implementations such as BarFly, abc2win, Muse or my own > humble abc2nwc?
I don't see how an open source abclib can have any influence on, let alone be a threat for these projects. What exactly do you mean? > I don't see abc as being defined by any software implementation but to > be a standard (or, perhaps, a protocol would be better) for the exchange > of musical information regardless of the use to which that information > is put. I heartily agree. -- bert van vreckem If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed... Oh wait! He does! To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
