on 7/6/03 2:55 PM, I. Oppenheim wrote: > If there exists an explicit linebreak command, there is > no reason why a bare newline should continue to imply > a linebreak.
You're getting away from the original intent of abc and one that most of the musicians in this group, I think, still want to retain -- i.e., that the abc transcription be HUMAN-readable. Humans don't require explicit !break! commands if there is a newline. I wouldn't want to see a reversal in such a basic assumption in the standard. To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
