But IPv6 is faster! lol

https://www.retevia.net/fast/ <https://www.retevia.net/fast/>




-- 
----
Cassidy B. Larson
CTO - InfoWest, Inc.
Voice: 435-773-6073
c...@infowest.com
----


> On Oct 23, 2019, at 11:42 AM, Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> 
> wrote:
> 
> Agreed. But just because 2/3 of the traffic goes that way doesn’t mean I gain 
> anything from it. 
> 
> And as long as the fax machine is downloading images as quickly as the mobile 
> phone. Does it matter?
> 
>> On Oct 23, 2019, at 12:19 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Matt, that's a strawman.  Nobody in this thread has argued that IPv4 isn't 
>> alive or in demand.
>> 
>> However, if you did implement dual stack I think you'd find that 2/3's of 
>> your traffic (by volume) will run on IPv6.  IPv6 was created 20 years ago.  
>> It's not new or "beta".  Adoption has been slow for all the reasons you 
>> stated about costs vs benefits, but IPv4 depletion is pushing this issue 
>> over the hump.
>> 
>> If you're able to get what you need and you're happy with the prices then 
>> nobody's going to make you change, but eventually you're going to get odd 
>> looks like the old guy who won't give up his fax machine.
>> 
>> 
>>> On 10/23/2019 11:58 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>> Prices for IPv4 on the secondary market continue to rise... that doesn't 
>>> sound like a commodity that's on its way out.. that sounds like something 
>>> that's very much alive and in demand.
>>> 
>>>> On 10/23/19 11:54 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>>> Not a penny wise, but definitely a pound foolish.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>  
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>  
>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>
>>>> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com>
>>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, October 23, 2019 8:01:22 AM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Buying new IP space
>>>> 
>>>> FUD ALERT!  FUD ALERT!   IPv4 is not going away any time soon, it's not
>>>> practical.     There are too many things that rely on IPv4.  And until
>>>> I can run only one stack I'm not planning to mass deploy IPv6. We have
>>>> an IPv6 deployment plan, but there is minimal benefit in dual stacking
>>>> and no financial gain until we need to.
>>>> 
>>>> Right now there is a negative benefit for deploying IPv6 (overhead,
>>>> management, no ROI, can't bill customers for static IPs).
>>>> 
>>>> We have a plan, but until it's needed we don't plan to roll  it out.
>>>> IPv4 will be here for many years to come.
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/23/19 8:54 AM, dave via AF wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yeah.. No..
>>>>> They are more up to date than you think just not ahead
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/21/19 2:20 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
>>>>>> yeah, no.
>>>>>> .gov agencies still run dos
>>>>>> 10 years at best til the ones that matter will be organized enough to
>>>>>> shut down ip4 access
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 2:12 PM Dennis Burgess via AF <af@af.afmug.com
>>>>>> <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Keep in mind that IPv6 will be necessary within 2-4 years, if the
>>>>>>    .govs shutdown access via v4 for security reasons.  No more FCC/
>>>>>>    IRS or any .GOV unless over v6.  Note that the current plan is 2-3
>>>>>>    years, I have given it an extra year for measure!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    V6 should be deployed NOW.   Not later, when you HAVE TO.  Then
>>>>>>    you will be making mistakes etc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    *LTI-Full_175px*
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
>>>>>>    MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE, MTCSE, HE IPv6 Sage, Cambium
>>>>>>    ePMP Certified *
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    *Link Technologies, Inc*-- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    *Office*: 314-735-0270  Website: http://www.linktechs.net
>>>>>>    <http://www.linktechs.net/>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
>>>>>>    <http://www.towercoverage.com>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>    <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of * Steve Jones
>>>>>>    *Sent:* Monday, October 21, 2019 2:07 PM
>>>>>>    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>    <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
>>>>>>    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Buying new IP space
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    NAT problems with BGP are why we are looking for more IP space
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    IP6 is still years out for us
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:43 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com
>>>>>>    <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>        If you're not doing it already, start thinking about dual
>>>>>>        stack with IPv4 CGN and IPv6 public IPs. There's a learning
>>>>>>        curve, but it's not that bad.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>        -Adam
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>        On 10/21/2019 12:51 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>            Where is the best place to get these? How do we verify
>>>>>>            space has a decent reputation so we dont go through months
>>>>>>            of cleanup and all that stuff?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>        --
>>>>>>        AF mailing list
>>>>>>        AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    --
>>>>>>    AF mailing list
>>>>>>    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to