???? ;) Let me rephrase that for you: I wish I could be as PRAISING of UBNT as you are.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > I wish I could be as critical of UBNT as you are. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Thursday, January 15, 2015 3:25:39 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous > > I have toned down how vocal I am when it comes to being pissed at UBNT in > public. I still do it quite often, it's just behind the scenes most of > the time. If I just beat them down every day it would be good for my > image or their image. I think they are a great company with good ideas > and a disruptive and interesting business model. When they do good, they do > great. When they f@#k up, they f@#k up in spectacular fashion. > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com > > On 01/15/2015 11:31 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Oh no, not at all. I once accused Josh of being a UBNT fanboy. It got quite > heated. He either changed his tune or I was mistaken. ;-) > > There are plenty of fanboys, don't put Josh in that category. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> <t...@voltbb.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 1:37:48 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous > > > Seth be careful stepping on the toes of ubiquiti's No#1 fanboi :) > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Seth Mattinen < se...@rollernet.us > wrote: > > > > > On 1/15/15 11:02, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > <blockquote> > I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti > here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz. > > Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid > operators, say so. > If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so. > If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis > studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so. > > In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something that > has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less > whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common > courtesy. > > > > > > > I agreed with the post I responded to and the points contained therein, with > my real life experience extrapolated to it a short response. I not only agree > that licensed bands get used up faster, but that it would exacerbate existing > instances of interference due to a higher percentage of ignorant operators > jumping on a lower entry point or companies like UBNT making it easier for > ignorant operators to enter the space and do bad things (i.e. past issues > with compliance test mode and TDWR). > > ~Seth > > </blockquote> > > > > > > >
