Wait...What is this? ;)  Mike?

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

> I tried to bite my tongue on this one (even though I meant it mostly
> jokingly), but here it is.
>
> Deserve it.
>
> I think the AF24 is an amazing product and that platform has a lot of
> potential. It just hasn't been further realized.
>
> The non-Titanium AirMax series has worked out very well.
>
> I hear the UniFi Cameras have worked out very well. I'm still rocking a
> bunch of airCams.
>
> Other than needing open fast handoff (and something else that I forget at
> the moment), I can't think of anything really wrong with UniFi. (Though I
> always have ideas for better devices.)
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Ben Moore" <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Thursday, January 15, 2015 3:40:52 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous
>
> ????  ;)  Let me rephrase that for you:
>
> I wish I could be as PRAISING of UBNT as you are.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>
>> I wish I could be as critical of UBNT as you are.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com>
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 15, 2015 3:25:39 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous
>>
>> I have toned down how vocal I am when it comes to being pissed at UBNT
>> in public. I still do it quite often, it's just behind the scenes most
>> of the time. If I just beat them down every day it would be good for my
>> image or their image. I think they are a great company with good ideas
>> and a disruptive and interesting business model. When they do good, they do
>> great. When they f@#k up, they f@#k up in spectacular fashion.
>>
>> josh reynolds :: chief information officer
>> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
>>
>> On 01/15/2015 11:31 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>
>> Oh no, not at all. I once accused Josh of being a UBNT fanboy. It got quite 
>> heated. He either changed his tune or I was mistaken. ;-)
>>
>> There are plenty of fanboys, don't put Josh in that category.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> <t...@voltbb.com>
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 1:37:48 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous
>>
>>
>> Seth be careful stepping on the toes of ubiquiti's No#1 fanboi :)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Seth Mattinen < se...@rollernet.us > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/15/15 11:02, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>
>> <blockquote>
>> I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti
>> here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz.
>>
>> Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid
>> operators, say so.
>> If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so.
>> If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis
>> studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so.
>>
>> In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something that
>> has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less
>> whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common
>> courtesy.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I agreed with the post I responded to and the points contained therein, with 
>> my real life experience extrapolated to it a short response. I not only 
>> agree that licensed bands get used up faster, but that it would exacerbate 
>> existing instances of interference due to a higher percentage of ignorant 
>> operators jumping on a lower entry point or companies like UBNT making it 
>> easier for ignorant operators to enter the space and do bad things (i.e. 
>> past issues with compliance test mode and TDWR).
>>
>> ~Seth
>>
>> </blockquote>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to