I wish I could be as critical of UBNT as you are.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 3:25:39 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous I have toned down how vocal I am when it comes to being pissed at UBNT in public . I still do it quite often, it's just behind the scenes most of the time . I f I just beat them down every day it would be good for my image or their image. I think they are a great company with good ideas and a disruptive and interesting business model. When they do good, they do great. When they f@#k up, they f@#k up in spectacular fashion. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 01/15/2015 11:31 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: Oh no, not at all. I once accused Josh of being a UBNT fanboy. It got quite heated. He either changed his tune or I was mistaken. ;-) There are plenty of fanboys, don't put Josh in that category. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 1:37:48 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous Seth be careful stepping on the toes of ubiquiti's No#1 fanboi :) On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Seth Mattinen < se...@rollernet.us > wrote: On 1/15/15 11:02, Josh Reynolds wrote: <blockquote> I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz. Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid operators, say so. If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so. If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so. In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something that has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common courtesy. I agreed with the post I responded to and the points contained therein, with my real life experience extrapolated to it a short response. I not only agree that licensed bands get used up faster, but that it would exacerbate existing instances of interference due to a higher percentage of ignorant operators jumping on a lower entry point or companies like UBNT making it easier for ignorant operators to enter the space and do bad things (i.e. past issues with compliance test mode and TDWR). ~Seth </blockquote>
