Yes, one did ;) On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> Damned radomes blow off in the wind... > > (at least one of them did) > > *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:46 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous > > If only you could read some of Josh's emails to us and you would see > that he isn't always showing us the love ;) He will dish it when it is > due...I have seen it publicly as well ;) > > Healthy discussion on backhauls and backhaul pricing...I will say that > since the AF24 launch, I have not seen an email/post related to AF24 > causing issues due to being installed by ignorant operators... > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:37 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: > >> Seth be careful stepping on the toes of ubiquiti's No#1 fanboi :) >> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/15/15 11:02, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>> >>>> I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti >>>> here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz. >>>> >>>> Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid >>>> operators, say so. >>>> If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so. >>>> If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis >>>> studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so. >>>> >>>> In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something that >>>> has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less >>>> whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common >>>> courtesy. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> I agreed with the post I responded to and the points contained therein, >>> with my real life experience extrapolated to it a short response. I not >>> only agree that licensed bands get used up faster, but that it would >>> exacerbate existing instances of interference due to a higher percentage of >>> ignorant operators jumping on a lower entry point or companies like UBNT >>> making it easier for ignorant operators to enter the space and do bad >>> things (i.e. past issues with compliance test mode and TDWR). >>> >>> ~Seth >>> >> >> > >
