or the power company or...
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brett A Mansfield" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:49:34 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna Tell that to Comcast or century link. I as a landlord and a WISP owner am conflicted on this. I don't think the ISP should be held responsible unless they did a shady job. The renter needs to know the rules of the place. The ISP should always ask if they are the owner of the place. If the renter says they are the owner, wether they signed something or not, then the renter is responsible. I disagree with you about what is damage. If it's done correctly it's not damage. Otherwise when they install any piping for the bathrooms or kitchen would be damage. If it's done professionally then everything is sealed and no warranty is voided...unless you're dealing with a shady builder. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On Mar 17, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Travis Johnson < [email protected] > wrote: Installing a J-mount (drilling holes in a roof) and cable penetration (drilling a hole in the side of the house) is DEFINITELY damage to the property. Any warranty on the roof becomes null and void unless a certified roofer does the work and certifies the install. Drilling a hole through the siding and house is also damage. Travis On 3/17/2015 11:28 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: <blockquote> I think we differ on what constitutes damage. Installing a J-mount and a cable penetration, no. Not sealing the above properly and water or critters intrude upon the structure, yes. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Travis Johnson" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:26:21 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna Tenants do not have the right to damage my property, regardless of their rights and due process. Travis On 3/17/2015 11:19 AM, John Woodfield wrote: <blockquote> Many landlords with that attitude end up criminally charged. There is such a thing as tenant rights and due process. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 17, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> It sounds right to me. He owns the land and property. Owner is king of his castle. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 17, 2015 1:13 PM, "John Woodfield" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I'm calling BS on this. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 17, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Travis Johnson < [email protected] > wrote: > > You still have to work it out with the actual owner, regardless of what the > tenant told you or even signed. > > Travis > >> On 3/17/2015 10:16 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >>> On 3/17/15 9:11, Travis Johnson wrote: >>> I would talk to the tenant and try and resolve things, but the ISP is >>> who did the actual damage to the property, without permission. Yes, they >>> "assumed" they had permission, but without a signed contract from the >>> legal owner of the property, the ISP does not have permission to cause >>> damage to the property. >> >> >> What do you do if your tenants misrepresent themselves as the owner with >> authority? >> >> ~Seth > </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
