As I said, I think we differ.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Travis Johnson" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:37:38 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna Installing a J-mount (drilling holes in a roof) and cable penetration (drilling a hole in the side of the house) is DEFINITELY damage to the property. Any warranty on the roof becomes null and void unless a certified roofer does the work and certifies the install. Drilling a hole through the siding and house is also damage. Travis On 3/17/2015 11:28 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: I think we differ on what constitutes damage. Installing a J-mount and a cable penetration, no. Not sealing the above properly and water or critters intrude upon the structure, yes. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Travis Johnson" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:26:21 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna Tenants do not have the right to damage my property, regardless of their rights and due process. Travis On 3/17/2015 11:19 AM, John Woodfield wrote: <blockquote> Many landlords with that attitude end up criminally charged. There is such a thing as tenant rights and due process. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 17, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> It sounds right to me. He owns the land and property. Owner is king of his castle. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 17, 2015 1:13 PM, "John Woodfield" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I'm calling BS on this. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 17, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Travis Johnson < [email protected] > wrote: > > You still have to work it out with the actual owner, regardless of what the > tenant told you or even signed. > > Travis > >> On 3/17/2015 10:16 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >>> On 3/17/15 9:11, Travis Johnson wrote: >>> I would talk to the tenant and try and resolve things, but the ISP is >>> who did the actual damage to the property, without permission. Yes, they >>> "assumed" they had permission, but without a signed contract from the >>> legal owner of the property, the ISP does not have permission to cause >>> damage to the property. >> >> >> What do you do if your tenants misrepresent themselves as the owner with >> authority? >> >> ~Seth > </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
