I dread when customers say “I had the roofers put your dish back up”.  I have 
seen them fasten it with roofing nails and no sealant.

I’d love to meet these roofers who “certify” a J-pipe install.


From: Patrick Leary 
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:44 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna

Exactly. This is one of those things where people's opinions don't mean a damn. 
Once holes were made, opinions are moot and the law kicks in because contracts 
are violated, warranties are voided, etc.

 

      Patrick Leary

      M 727.501.3735 


     
           
     

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 1:38 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna

 

Installing a J-mount (drilling holes in a roof) and cable penetration (drilling 
a hole in the side of the house) is DEFINITELY damage to the property. Any 
warranty on the roof becomes null and void unless a certified roofer does the 
work and certifies the install. Drilling a hole through the siding and house is 
also damage.

Travis



On 3/17/2015 11:28 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

  I think we differ on what constitutes damage.

  Installing a J-mount and a cable penetration, no.
  Not sealing the above properly and water or critters intrude upon the 
structure, yes.



  -----
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "Travis Johnson" mailto:t...@ida.net
  To: af@afmug.com
  Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:26:21 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna

  Tenants do not have the right to damage my property, regardless of their 
rights and due process.

  Travis

  On 3/17/2015 11:19 AM, John Woodfield wrote:

    Many landlords with that attitude end up criminally charged. There is such 
a thing as tenant rights and due process. 

    Sent from my iPhone


    On Mar 17, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
wrote:

      It sounds right to me.  He owns the land and property.  Owner is king of 
his castle.

      Josh Luthman
      Office: 937-552-2340
      Direct: 937-552-2343
      1100 Wayne St
      Suite 1337
      Troy, OH 45373

      On Mar 17, 2015 1:13 PM, "John Woodfield" <john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz> wrote:



      I'm calling BS on this.

      Sent from my iPhone

      > On Mar 17, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Travis Johnson <t...@ida.net> wrote:
      >
      > You still have to work it out with the actual owner, regardless of what 
the tenant told you or even signed.
      >
      > Travis
      >
      >> On 3/17/2015 10:16 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
      >>> On 3/17/15 9:11, Travis Johnson wrote:
      >>> I would talk to the tenant and try and resolve things, but the ISP is
      >>> who did the actual damage to the property, without permission. Yes, 
they
      >>> "assumed" they had permission, but without a signed contract from the
      >>> legal owner of the property, the ISP does not have permission to cause
      >>> damage to the property.
      >>
      >>
      >> What do you do if your tenants misrepresent themselves as the owner 
with authority?
      >>
      >> ~Seth
      >

   

   






************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************





************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************

Reply via email to