So if as a tenant, I have a toilet professionally installed in the living room, that wouldn't be damage?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Brett A Mansfield < br...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote: > Tell that to Comcast or century link. > > I as a landlord and a WISP owner am conflicted on this. I don't think the > ISP should be held responsible unless they did a shady job. The renter > needs to know the rules of the place. The ISP should always ask if they are > the owner of the place. If the renter says they are the owner, wether they > signed something or not, then the renter is responsible. > > I disagree with you about what is damage. If it's done correctly it's not > damage. Otherwise when they install any piping for the bathrooms or kitchen > would be damage. > > If it's done professionally then everything is sealed and no warranty is > voided...unless you're dealing with a shady builder. > > Thank you, > Brett A Mansfield > > On Mar 17, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Travis Johnson <t...@ida.net> wrote: > > Installing a J-mount (drilling holes in a roof) and cable penetration > (drilling a hole in the side of the house) is DEFINITELY damage to the > property. Any warranty on the roof becomes null and void unless a certified > roofer does the work and certifies the install. Drilling a hole through the > siding and house is also damage. > > Travis > > > On 3/17/2015 11:28 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > I think we differ on what constitutes damage. > > Installing a J-mount and a cable penetration, no. > Not sealing the above properly and water or critters intrude upon the > structure, yes. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Travis Johnson" <t...@ida.net> <t...@ida.net> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:26:21 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna > > Tenants do not have the right to damage my property, regardless of their > rights and due process. > > Travis > > On 3/17/2015 11:19 AM, John Woodfield wrote: > > Many landlords with that attitude end up criminally charged. There is such > a thing as tenant rights and due process. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 17, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > It sounds right to me. He owns the land and property. Owner is king > of his castle. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Mar 17, 2015 1:13 PM, "John Woodfield" <john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz> wrote: > >> I'm calling BS on this. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Mar 17, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Travis Johnson <t...@ida.net> wrote: >> > >> > You still have to work it out with the actual owner, regardless of what >> the tenant told you or even signed. >> > >> > Travis >> > >> >> On 3/17/2015 10:16 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >> >>> On 3/17/15 9:11, Travis Johnson wrote: >> >>> I would talk to the tenant and try and resolve things, but the ISP is >> >>> who did the actual damage to the property, without permission. Yes, >> they >> >>> "assumed" they had permission, but without a signed contract from the >> >>> legal owner of the property, the ISP does not have permission to cause >> >>> damage to the property. >> >> >> >> >> >> What do you do if your tenants misrepresent themselves as the owner >> with authority? >> >> >> >> ~Seth >> > >> > > > >
